Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles and Phyllis M Frias Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Youth Development$15MHousing & Shelter$4.6MEducation$4.3MHuman Services$350kEmployment$34kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $380k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.3M
$150,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$2,211,000
NEVADA RURAL HOUSING INC$1,528,298
MESQUITE WORKS$874,059
CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$648,140
BISHOP GORMAN HIGH SCHOOL$150,000
COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION$130,477
PROJECT 150 INC$100,000
FRIAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$48,653
CRISTO REY ST VIATOR LAS VEGAS WORK STUDY INC$34,000
LVMPD FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE OF NEVADA: $200k → 13%PROJECT 150 INC: $250k → 13%PROJECT 150 INC: $100k → 13%MESQUITE WORKS: $2.2M → 13%MESQUITE WORKS: $874k → 13%MESQUITE WORKS: $120k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 7 repeat orgs$413k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$24M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+4%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $213k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $12M · revenue -3% · 35% of their budget
  • NR
    NEVADA RURAL HOUSING INC
    4× · 2019–2024 · $4.6M · revenue -5%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.7M · revenue -8%

Funded once

  • LI
    LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE OF NV
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada State High School

To support students in a college environment with personal, academic, and social skills

Education
2
Crsvlv College Preparatory Inc

To serve as a real property holding company for Cristo Rey Las Vegas College Preparatory, Inc.

Education
3
Nevada Succeeds

Our membership is united in pursuit of immediate and continuous improvements to the state's education system. we support an ambitious, agressive and comprehensive reform agenda to dramatically increase the college and workforce readiness…

4
Community Services of Nevada

CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and

Housing & Shelter
5
Nevada State College Foundation

The mission of the nevada state college foundation board of trustees is to serve as ambassadors for nevada state college, to serve as fiduciary stewards of funds received by the foundation, and to raise funds in support of the educational,…

Education
6
Southern Nevada Trades High School Co Brett Willis

Southern Nevada Trades High School will promote excellence in academic and career and technical education, preparing students for post-secondary education and careers in construction-related professions.

Education
7
Western Nevada College Foundation

Capital and expense fundraising for western nevada college to support the strategic and tactical planning.

8
Nevada Virtual Charter School

At nevada virtual charter school, we will make a difference by meeting the unique needs of our diverse students, preparing them for college and carerr in the 21st century through high quality instruction in our virtual platform.

Education
9
Nevada Land Trust

To preserve and protect the special places and open spaces of nevada for future generations.

10
Coral Academy of Science Las Vegas

The mission of caslv is to inspire and empower all students to achieve their highest potential through a rigourous, college-preparatory, and culturally responsive stem education that fosters innovation, critical thinking, and a lifelong…

Education
11
Fair Government Nevada

To promote fair government practices and for all other legal purposes

12
Nevada State Parks Foundation

The nevada state parks foundation is dedicated to enhancing and preserving the natural beauty, cultural heritage and recreational opportunities within the nevada division of state parks. the foundation is committed to supporting the…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Institute of Nv and the most unlike its peers is Cristo Rey St Viator Las Vegas Work Study. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC — $12,125,145 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INCNEVADA RURAL HOUSING INC — $4,550,024 · Housing & ShelterNEVADA RURAL HOUSING…CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $3,655,207 · OtherCLARK COUNTY PUBLI…BISHOP GORMAN HIGH SCHOOL — $225,000 · OtherBISHOP GORMAN HIGH…+2 more — $121,592 · OtherMESQUITE WORKS INC — $3,173,795 · Human ServicesMESQUITE WORKS IN…PROJECT 150 — $350,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 150LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE OF NV — $200,000 · Human ServicesLEADERSHIP INSTIT…COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC — $130,477 · PhilanthropyCristo Rey St Viator Las Vegas Work Study — $34,000 · EducationLas Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation — $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Youth Development$12,125,145Housing & Shelter$4,550,024Other$4,001,799Human Services$3,723,795Philanthropy$130,477Education$34,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC — $12,125,145 over 7y, 35% of budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $3,655,207 over 6y, 17% of budgetMESQUITE WORKS INC — $3,173,795 over 3y, 86% of budgetPROJECT 150 — $350,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC — $130,477 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetCristo Rey St Viator Las Vegas Work Study — $34,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLas Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NV Energy Charitable FoundationNV15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles and Phyllis M Frias Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles and Phyllis M Frias Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Charles and Phyllis M Frias Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph