Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$308k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$785kArts & Culture$600kHealth$366kHuman Services$296kHousing & Shelter$253kFood & Nutrition$107kPhilanthropy$51kCivil Rights$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $265k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$35,500
WV SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$30,000
Individual grant recipient$22,500
CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA$20,000
YWCA$20,000
CLAY CENTER$17,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$15,200
WV HEALTH RIGHT$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ARTS AMPLIFIED INC$15,000
CHILDRENS THEATRE OF CHARLESTON$10,000
FAIRMONT STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
TAMARACK FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%POLLEN 8: $10k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $29k → 18%DAYMARK: $23k → 18%DAYMARK: $19k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $14k → 18%DAYMARK: $11k → 18%GOOD NEWS MOUNTAINEER GARAGE: $10k → 18%DAYMARK INC: $9k → 18%KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE: $10k → 18%KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE: $5k → 18%KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE: $5k → 18%KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 36 repeat orgs$381k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
19

Total granted

$2.2M
$341k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+61%

Still filing today

47%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +0%
  • DI
    DAYMARK INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +60%
  • CT
    CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $77k
  • WH
    WV HEALTHY KIDS
    one grant, 2017 · $46k
  • SA
    ST ALBANS BRANCH LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

—
2
West Virginia Community Voices Inc

To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.

—
3
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
4
Capitol Market Inc

Capitol market is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that serves as a retail, community, and economic hub for the kanawha valley and beyond. housed in a turn-of-the-century rail depot, capitol market is tasked with supporting small businesses and west…

Community Improvement
5
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
6
West Virginia Public Theatre Inc

The organization seeks to raise conciousness and compassion through groundbreaking, high quality theatrical performances and life-changing educational programs.

—
7
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
8
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
9
West Virginia Independent Colleges and Universities Inc

The mission of wvicu is to advance collectively the interests of west virginia's independent colleges and universities and their students.

Education
10
West Virginia Health Improvement Institute Inc

The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.

Health
11
Generation West Virginia Inc

Generation wv is the statewide organization dedicated to attracting, retaining, and advancing young talent in the mountain state. generation west virginia equips young west virginians with key skills and career opportunities, ensuring…

Youth Development
12
Mountain State Justice Inc

Mountain state justice provides free legal services to low income people in west virginia and assures that low income people have access to the court system.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Health Right Inc; the most unlike its peers is Coda Mountain Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA: $151,200 · OtherYWCACLAY CENTER: $142,000 · OtherCLAY CENTERCHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA: $139,000 · OtherCHARLESTON LIGHT OPERAIndividual grant recipient: $132,604 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $111,000 · OtherMARSHALL UNIVERSITYMARY C SNOW WEST SIDE ELEMENTARY: $108,948 · OtherMARY C SNOW WEST SIDE ELEMENTARYIndividual grant recipient: $106,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $76,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $75,186 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $71,000 · OtherWV CODING CLUB: $68,278 · Other+29 more: $569,625 · Other+29 moreWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $220,000 · Arts & CultureWEST VIRGINIA S…CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $54,400 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S THEA…CHARLESTON BALLET INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLESTON BALL…TAMARACK FOUNDATION INC: $17,800 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $16,100 · Arts & CultureCHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC: $80,000 · HealthCHILDHOOD…CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC: $80,000 · HealthCHILDRENS…CAMC FOUNDATION INC: $69,000 · HealthCAMC FOUN…DAYMARK INC: $104,596 · Human ServicesKANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesGOOD NEWS MOUNTAINEER GARAGE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPollen 8 Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $65,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $7,000 · EducationCoda Mountain Academy Inc: $4,450 · EducationTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $45,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,752,041Arts & Culture$348,300Health$229,000Human Services$147,096Education$76,450Philanthropy$51,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $220,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetDAYMARK INC: $104,596 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC: $80,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetCHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC: $80,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $71,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCAMC FOUNDATION INC: $69,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON: $54,400 over 4y, 11% of budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLESTON BALLET INC: $40,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetRELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COMMUNITY RENEWAL INC: $36,250 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC: $27,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTAMARACK FOUNDATION INC: $17,800 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetMANNA MEAL INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD NEWS MOUNTAINEER GARAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPollen 8 Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CHILDREN'S CHORUS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetROARK SULLIVAN LIFEWAY CENTER: $7,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCoda Mountain Academy Inc: $4,450 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA MUSIC HALL OF FAME INC: $3,600 over 1y, 2.9% of budget10 IN 10 INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds DAYMARK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S THEATRE OF CHARLESTON ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR COMMUNITY RENEWAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KANAWHA VALLEY COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds TAMARACK FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV50.9× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Herscher Foundation Inc · Tgkvf Inc · Bernard H and Blanche E Jacobson Foundation · The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · The Daywood Foundationinc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Maier Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty’s filings →

    More from the funding graph