How much did CHARLES & MARY FAYNE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of CHARLES & MARY FAYNE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

youth

2019

—

2020

childrenchildhealth

2021

library

2022

—

2023

—

2024

higher educationjusticehealth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $43k
$10k–50k16 grants · $265k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$35,500
WV SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$30,000
WVU MOUNTAINEER HUB$22,500
CHARLESTON LIGHT OPERA$20,000
YWCA$20,000
CLAY CENTER$17,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$15,200
ARTS AMPLIFIED INC$15,000
WV HEALTH RIGHT$15,000
REA OF HOPE$15,000
FESTIVALL CHARLESTON$10,000
LEGAL AID OF WV$10,000
TAMARACK FOUNDATION$10,000
CHILDRENS THEATRE OF CHARLESTON$10,000
FAIRMONT STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 36 repeat orgs$410k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+70%

Still filing today

42%

18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DI
DAYMARK INC
6× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +71%
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
4× · 2018–2021 · $65k · revenue +20%
CT
CHILDRENS THEATRE OF CHARLESTON
4× · 2020–2024 · $54k · revenue +66%

Funded once

WC
WV CONFERENCE UMC
one grant, 2017 · $77k
WH
WV HEALTHY KIDS
one grant, 2017 · $46k
SA
ST ALBANS BRANCH LIBRARY
one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Community Care of West Virginia Inc

To provide high quality, accessible comprehensive and cost-effective healthcare services to our patients while serving as their medical home.

—

West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes.

Health

Charleston Area Therapeutic

Provide therapy using horses for disabled children and adults. regular program operates six days per week for public school special education classes and private students.

Health

Capitol Market Inc

Capitol market is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that serves as a retail, community, and economic hub for the kanawha valley and beyond. housed in a turn-of-the-century rail depot, capitol market is tasked with supporting small businesses and west…

Community Improvement

West Virginia University Hospitals Inc

WVU Hospitals exists to provide a quality healthcare system, including tertiary services, to the citizens of WV and the surrounding region.

Health

Wv Helping Hands

Human Services

West Virginia Statewide Independent

Established pursuant to federal and state legislation, the organization functions both independently and as a partner with the west virginia centers for independent living and the west virginia division of rehabilitation services (wvdrs)…

Human Services

Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virginia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter

Carilion Medical Center

Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.

Health

Charleston Area Medical Center Inc

Striving to provide the best healthcare to every patient, every day. camc owns and operates four separately-licensed hospitals as a tertiary-care teaching hospital designed to provide care for community residents through every stage of…

Health

West Virginia University Alumni

Wvuaa provides life-long support of our alumni and friends and serves the interest of the university.

Education

Mountain Cap of West Virginia Inc

Mountain cap of west virginia, inc. provides services to the low income, underpriveleged and elderly citizens of west virginia through weatherization, medicaid waiver, low income housing, child services and other programs.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy West Virginia Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camc Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/20

Grantees still filing

16/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,019,641Health$210,000Human Services$147,096Arts & Culture$119,700Education$76,450Philanthropy$51,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV43.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Tgkvf Inc · Herscher Foundation Inc · Bernard H and Blanche E Jacobson Foundation · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Maier Foundation Inc · The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation · The Daywood Foundationinc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · The McGee Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHARLES & MARY FAYNE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHILDRENS THEATRE OF CHARLESTON.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +66% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 237441348 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CHILDRENS THEATRE OF CHARLESTON, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 11% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Charles & Mary Fayne?

Find your warmest path to Charles & Mary Fayne through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHARLES & MARY FAYNE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Charles & Mary Fayne?

More from the funding graph

CHARLES & MARY FAYNE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Charles & Mary Fayne?

More from the funding graph