Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$637kEducation$310kPhilanthropy$145kHealth$100kArts & Culture$40kYouth Development$20kCrime & Legal$15kFood & Nutrition$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANE CHANGE$100,000
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE$10,000
CONWAY SENIOR CENTER$10,000
HUGHES CENTER$6,300
LEBANON CONCERT ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LIVE 2 GIVE HOPE: $29k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 11 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
15

Total granted

$1.0M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-49%
+27%

Still filing today

9%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HUGHES SENIOR CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $509k
  • LR
    LEBANON R-III SCHOOL DISTRICT
    4× · 2017–2021 · $244k
  • LA
    LEBANON AREA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $145k · revenue -49%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CROSS CHRISTAIN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • L2
    Live 2 Give Hope
    one grant, 2023 · $29k · revenue -1%
  • C
    COPE
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life After Meth Inc

Lam is a community effort initiated by local churches to help rebuild the devasted lives of people in knox county, indiana following their tragic descent into methamphetamine addiction.

Human Services
2
Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc

The Organization is dedicated to bringing about change in institutions, laws, politics, attitudes, and beliefs which will allow individuals to live free of violence.

—
3
United Way of Lebanon County Inc

To serve as thought leaders, convene community, promote collaboration, and develop resources and solutions to strengthen the lebanon county community.

Philanthropy
4
Hope Is Alive Ministries Inc

Hope is Alive Ministries, Inc. exists to radically change the lives of drug addicts, alcoholics, and those who love them.

Health
5
Lane County Community Foundation

The mission of Lane County Community Foundation (the Foundation) is to improve the quality of life in Lane County, Kansas and communities within Lane County, and to ensure that the communities in and around Lane County will forever remain…

Philanthropy
6
Lebanon Lifesaving Crew Inc

To provide emergency medical care

—
7
Light From Light Inc

Light from light partners with local leaders to provide healthcare and nutrition for the most vulnerable communities in haiti. our vision is that no child ever dies from malnutrition. our three program focus areas are: 1) nutrition…

International
8
Lebanese Empowered Against Poverty Inc

Lebanon has been going through some challenging times since 2021; a combination of socio-economic meltdown, political paralysis, a massive currency devaluation, an uncontrolled covid pandemic most lebanese experienced severe shortages of…

International
9
HopeShines Ministry

HopeShines Ministry is a Christian faith-based, Christ centered, Biblically based, non-profit organization dedicated to offering hope and encouragement for a changed life by furnishing Bibles and resources both locally as well as in other…

Religion
10
Lagrange County Hope Inc

To help people in need by delivering food and basic supplies to those within our lagrange county service area with the goal of creating community connections to encourage and support vulnerable families.

Food & Nutrition
11
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
12
City Church Network of Arkansas

CityChurch Network is a multi-denominational, multi-ethnic, relational network of churches working together for the good of our cities through extraordinary prayer, leader equipping, and collective impact

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lebanon Area Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Lebanon Concert Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUGHES SENIOR CENTER: $509,026 · OtherHUGHES SENIOR CENTERLEBANON R-III SCHOOL DISTRICT: $243,600 · OtherLEBANON R-III SCHOOL DISTRICTLEBANON AREA FOUNDATION: $145,000 · OtherLEBANON AREA FOUNDATIONCONWAY SENIOR CENTER: $65,420 · OtherCONWAY SENIOR CENTER+17 more: $130,200 · Other+17 moreLANE CHANGE INC: $100,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthLEBANON CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Arts & CultureLive 2 Give Hope: $29,100 · Human ServicesElevate Lebanon: $13,287 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCOPE: $15,000 · Crime & LegalL-Life Food Pantry: $13,550 · Community Improvement
Other$1,093,246Health$100,100Arts & Culture$30,000Human Services$29,100Housing & Shelter$23,287Crime & Legal$15,000Community Improvement$13,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEBANON AREA FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetLANE CHANGE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetLEBANON CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetLive 2 Give Hope: $29,100 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOPE: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetL-Life Food Pantry: $13,550 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetElevate Lebanon: $13,287 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEBANON AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LANE CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEBANON CONCERT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Live 2 Give Hope ↗
  • Who funds COPE ↗
  • Who funds L-Life Food Pantry ↗
  • Who funds Elevate Lebanon ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alfred & Irma Walther Charitable FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alfred & Irma Walther Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles & Ethel Hughes’ filings →

More from the funding graph