Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$131k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
4
Organizations funded FY2024
25%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 10
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$3.6M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 25% of the organizations Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 48% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$131k60%
FY20244$28k25%
FY20236$103k33%
FY20224$38k25%
FY20218$305k25%
FY20207$230k29%
FY20199$186k67%
FY201810$246k50%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$637kEducation$310kPhilanthropy$145kHealth$100kArts & Culture$40kYouth Development$20kCrime & Legal$15kFood & Nutrition$14kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Lebanon R-Iii School District$243,6004n/a
Lebanon Area Foundation$145,00056%
Lane Change Inc$100,000121%
Lebanon Concert Association$30,000520%
Live 2 Give Hope$29,10013%
Cope$15,00012%
L-Life Food Pantry$13,55011%
Elevate Lebanon$13,28719%
Sleep in Heavenly Peace Inc$10,0001n/a
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$5,00010%
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Lebanon R-Iii School District$243,6004n/a
Lebanon Area Foundation$145,00056%
Lane Change Inc$100,000121%
Lebanon Concert Association$30,000520%
Live 2 Give Hope$29,10013%
Cope$15,00012%
L-Life Food Pantry$13,55011%
Elevate Lebanon$13,28719%
Sleep in Heavenly Peace Inc$10,0001n/a
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$5,00010%
Ozarks Technical Community College Foundation$2,50010%
The Shriners' Hospital for Children$10010%

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($697k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLebanon Area Foundation: $145,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetLane Change Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetLebanon Concert Association: $30,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetLive 2 Give Hope: $29,100 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCope: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetL-Life Food Pantry: $13,550 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetElevate Lebanon: $13,287 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetFellowship of Christian Athletes: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOzarks Technical Community College Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Shriners' Hospital for Children: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alfred & Irma Walther Charitable FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alfred & Irma Walther Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation

How much does Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation give?
Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $131,300 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (49%), Education (24%), Philanthropy (11%).
Who are Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Lebanon R-Iii School District ($244k), Lebanon Area Foundation ($145k), Lane Change Inc ($100k).
Does Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 25% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Alfred & Irma Walther Charitable Foundation, Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc, The Blackbaud Giving Fund.
Where is Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation based?
Charles & Ethel Hughes Foundation is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Charles & Ethel Hughes’ filings →

More from the funding graph