Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles & Alda Horgan Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$177kReligion$86kArts & Culture$47kHealth$19kHuman Services$17kPhilanthropy$16kHousing & Shelter$16kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$922k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$11,000
SAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE$6,000
FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH$6,000
CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISH$6,000
SAGINAW ART MUSEUM$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
SAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION OF SAGINAW$3,000
UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY$1,200
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$1,200
GOOD NEIGHBOR MISSION$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE: $6k → 18%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $2k → 21%JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER: $6k → 18%CHILDREN'S ZOO SAGINAW: $6k → 18%SAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE: $5k → 18%CHILDREN'S ZOO SAGINAW: $3k → 18%SAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE: $3k → 18%CHILDRENS ZOO: $3k → 18%SAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE: $3k → 18%CHILDREN'S ZOO SAGINAW: $3k → 18%SAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE: $3k → 18%GOOD NEIGHBORS MISSION INC: $2k → 18%GOOD NEIGHBOR MISSION: $2k → 18%SAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE: $2k → 18%CHILDRENS ZOO: $2k → 18%CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $12k → 18%CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $7k → 18%CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISH: $6k → 18%CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISH: $6k → 18%CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISH: $5k → 18%CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISH: $5k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $4k → 18%CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISH: $4k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $3k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $3k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $3k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $3k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $2k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $2k → 18%FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $12k → 18%FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $7k → 18%FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $6k → 18%SAGINAW BAY SYMPHONY: $6k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6k → 18%SAGINAW RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 18%FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $6k → 18%FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $5k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 18%FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $5k → 18%FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $4k → 18%UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $3k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 18%SAGINAW BAY SYMPHONY: $3k → 18%CITY RESCUE MISSION OF SAGINAW: $3k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 18%SAGINAW BAY ORCHESTRA: $3k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 18%UNITED WAY SAGINAW: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
OH
PA
MD
NC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 23 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
28

Total granted

$317k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+11%

Still filing today

26%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • T
    TEMPLEARTS
    7× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +386%
  • RM
    Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan
    6× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +23%
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    2× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • JC
    JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • SR
    SAGINAW RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
3
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

—
4
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
7
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
10
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
12
University Corporate Research Park I Inc

To hold title and perform related functions in connection with a research park and innovation center in support of michigan state university research foundation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Madonna University; the most unlike its peers is Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST CONGREGATION CHURCH: $43,136 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATION CHURCHMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $26,520 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYCHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISH: $24,770 · OtherCHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD PARISHSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,085 · OtherSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYSAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $21,568 · OtherSAGINAW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYSAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSE: $20,985 · OtherSAGINAW JAPANESE TEA HOUSEGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $18,850 · OtherCHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $18,366 · Other+36 more: $177,680 · Other+36 moreTEMPLEARTS: $19,355 · Arts & CultureRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $15,685 · Housing & ShelterUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,085 · EducationMadonna University: $3,085 · EducationHOPE COLLEGE: $1,750 · EducationUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $7,154 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,854 · HealthBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $1,750 · Youth Development
Other$374,960Arts & Culture$19,355Housing & Shelter$15,685Education$7,920Philanthropy$7,154Health$3,854Youth Development$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEMPLEARTS: $19,355 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $15,685 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $7,154 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $6,935 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetELMHURST UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,854 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,085 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALUS UNIVERSITY: $3,085 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadonna University: $3,085 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEMPLEARTS ↗
  • Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles & Alda Horgan Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles & Alda Horgan Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles & Alda Horgan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph