Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles a Sullivan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$623k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of CHARLES A SULLIVAN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $515k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS$50,000
WYANDOTTE PREGNANCY CLINIC$35,000
BISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER$25,000
HOPE HOUSE$20,000
MOM'S HOUSE$20,000
SOJOURNER CENTER$20,000
SAFEHOME$20,000
NEWHOUSE$20,000
ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC$20,000
CROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE$15,000
FIRST WAY PREGNANCY CENTER$15,000
ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE$15,000
MIRA VIA$15,000
BELLA VITA NETWORK$15,000
HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $747k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAFEHOME: $20k → 5%INSIGHT WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 15%MOM'S HOUSE: $20k → 18%SAFEHOME: $20k → 5%INSIGHT WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 15%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $15k → 11%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $6k → 12%MOM'S HOUSE: $20k → 18%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%INSIGHT WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 15%ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE: $10k → 11%MOM'S HOUSE: $20k → 18%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%INSIGHT WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 15%MOM'S HOUSE: $20k → 18%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%INSIGHT WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 15%MOM'S HOUSE: $20k → 18%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%INSIGHT WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 15%MOM'S HOUSE: $15k → 18%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%INSIGHT WOMEN'S CENTER: $10k → 15%MOM'S HOUSE: $15k → 18%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%MOM'S HOUSE: $15k → 18%SAFEHOME: $15k → 5%MOM'S HOUSE: $10k → 18%HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO: $15k → 18%FRIENDS OF YATES: $10k → 16%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $20k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%MOTHER'S REFUGE: $15k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $20k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $20k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
KS
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 55 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
11

Total granted

$4.7M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
-14%

Still filing today

71%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $123k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WYANDOTTE PREGNANCY CLINIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $370k · revenue +127%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +24%
  • HO
    HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KAN
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • AA
    ADVICE AID PREGNANCY CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION GREATER TOL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
2
Carolina Pregnancy Center

We are a crisis pregnancy center offering assistance to all women with pregnancy related issues.

Health
3
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
4
Life-Way Family and Pregnancy Suppo

The organization provides women in crisis pregnancies alternatives to abortion, regardless of their religion, race or position in life and to help them come to a decision they and their babies can live the rest of their lives.

Health
5
Lifechoice Pregnancy Care Center

To provide support to unplanned pregnancies.

—
6
Life Choices Resource Center Inc

To provide pregnancy testing (including ultrasound examinations), counseling, and referrals as needed (including post-abortion counseling) in our offices and through our 24-hour help-line.

—
7
Loving Arms - a Crisis Pregnancy Center

Sharing the love of christ while promoting sexual integrity and bringing life affirming services to those unprepared for pregnancy or hurt by abortion

Health
8
Life Choice Center

To provide christian based outreach to clients by providing services and information free of charge to anyone in a crisis pregnancy situation, with the goal of assisting the client to carry the pregnancy to term and with continued care…

Health
9
Life Choices Pregnancy Center Inc

We are an outreach ministry of jesus christ committed to providing compassionate guidance, education, and help for all involved prior to, during, and following an unplanned pregnancy.

Health
10
Pregnancy Resource Center

Provide assistance to women who are pregnant

—
11
Birthchoice

Consulting for pregnant women. community service referrals.

—
12
Pregnancy Care Center

The pregnancy care center empowers individuals to make life-affirming decisions through education, medical services, counseling, and compassionate care based on the ministry of jesus christ.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safehome Inc and the most unlike its peers is Birthline Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Senior Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Pregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%47%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%48%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/53
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,512

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
37/49
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC — $200,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INCBISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER — $197,500 · OtherBISHOP SULLIVAN CENTERARCHDIOCESE OF KANSAS CITY — $140,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF KANSAS CITYBETHANY HOUSE — $135,000 · OtherBETHANY HOUSEFIRST WAY PREGNANCY CENTER — $135,000 · OtherFIRST WAY PREGNANCY CENTERMARY'S CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER CO CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE — $130,000 · OtherMARY'S CHOICE PREGNANCY CENTER CO CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESECATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITY — $130,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF KANSAS CITYROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $115,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $115,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME ACADEMY — $110,000 · OtherAID TO WOMEN CENTER — $90,000 · Other+39 more — $867,000 · Other+39 moreHEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC — $165,000 · Human ServicesHEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INCMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO — $155,000 · Human ServicesMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLED…HOPE HOUSE INC — $145,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE INCSAFEHOME INC — $145,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INCMothers Refuge — $140,000 · Human ServicesMothers RefugeSOJOURNER CENTER — $127,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTERInsight Womens Center Inc — $70,000 · Human ServicesInsight Womens Center In…+6 more — $107,000 · Human Services+6 moreWYANDOTTE PREGNANCY CLINIC INC — $370,000 · HealthWYANDOTTE PREGNANCY CLI…BELLA VITA NETWORK — $145,500 · HealthBELLA VITA NETWORKAdvice and Aid Pregnancy Centers Inc — $105,000 · HealthAdvice and Aid Pregnanc…BOWLING GREEN PREGNANCY CENTER — $90,000 · HealthBOWLING GREEN PREGNANCY…COMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER — $85,000 · HealthCOMPASSION PREGNANCY CE…LIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC — $75,000 · HealthLIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CL…PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $52,500 · HealthSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $52,500 · HealthALEXANDRAS HOUSE — $45,000 · Health+2 more — $25,000 · HealthHISTORIC SOUTH INITIATIVE — $160,000 · Community ImprovementHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $65,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $32,500 · Food & NutritionThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $25,000 · Food & NutritionMIRAVIA INC — $110,000 · Housing & ShelterHouse of Refuge Sunnyslope Inc — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterLIFE CARE PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $100,000 · Civil Rights
Other$2,364,500Human Services$1,054,000Health$1,045,500Community Improvement$160,000Food & Nutrition$122,500Housing & Shelter$116,000Civil Rights$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWYANDOTTE PREGNANCY CLINIC INC — $370,000 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC — $200,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC — $165,000 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetHISTORIC SOUTH INITIATIVE — $160,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO — $155,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetBELLA VITA NETWORK — $145,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC — $145,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSAFEHOME INC — $145,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMothers Refuge — $140,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetFIRST WAY PREGNANCY CENTER — $135,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER — $127,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $115,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMIRAVIA INC — $110,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetAdvice and Aid Pregnancy Centers Inc — $105,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetLIFE CARE PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $100,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetBOWLING GREEN PREGNANCY CENTER — $90,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetAID TO WOMEN CENTER — $90,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCOMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER — $85,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetLIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC — $75,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetInsight Womens Center Inc — $70,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $65,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON INC — $65,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetKansans For Life Inc — $60,000 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetCRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL — $55,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $52,500 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $52,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALEXANDRAS HOUSE — $45,000 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FUND — $45,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNEWHOUSE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF YATES INC — $35,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetREALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES — $35,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $32,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAlternatives to Violence Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Food Bank — $20,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of Refuge Sunnyslope Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSafe Alliance Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSeton Center Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHLINE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBirthline of Loveland — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WYANDOTTE PREGNANCY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC SOUTH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO ↗
  • Who funds BELLA VITA NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Mothers Refuge ↗
  • Who funds FIRST WAY PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRAVIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Advice and Aid Pregnancy Centers Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CARE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOWLING GREEN PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AID TO WOMEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Insight Womens Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Kansans For Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRAS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEWHOUSE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…United Way of Greater…Constance M Cooper Ch…John J Sullivan Jr Fo…Health Forward Founda…Greater HorizonsThe H & R Block Found…William G McGowan Cha…The Sunderland Founda…Knights of Columbus C…Servant FoundationThe Dehaemers Family …
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO31.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Constance M Cooper Charitable Foundation · John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · Health Forward Foundation · Greater Horizons · The H & R Block Foundation · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Sunderland Foundation · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Servant Foundation · The Dehaemers Family Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles a Sullivan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles a Sullivan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Charles a Sullivan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines