Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles a and Leona K Gruber Fnd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$48kHuman Services$19kHealth$11kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$2kYouth Development$2k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$383k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE$5,000
DESALES UNIVERSITY$3,500
CEDAR CREST COLLEGE$2,500
LIFEPATH FOUNDATION$1,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT: $2k → 11%THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHIL: $3k → 11%THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN &: $2k → 11%BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH HOMES INC: $3k → 11%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE: $2k → 11%LIFEPATH FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%LIFEPATH FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$58k · 8 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$58k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DU
    DESALES UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +17%
  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +42%
  • CF
    CAMELOT FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Common Place Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -22%
  • YF
    YOURPATH FOR ADULT LEARNERS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • BF
    BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH HOMES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
4
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
5
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
6
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education
7
Macalester College

Macalester is committed to being a preeminent liberal arts college with an educational program known for its high standards for scholarship and its special emphasis on internationalism, multiculturalism, and service to society.

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Meredith College

Meredith college, grounded in the liberal arts and committed to professional preparation, educates and inspires students to live with integrity and provide leadership for the needs, opportunities and challenges of society.

Education
11
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
12
Le Moyne College

The College is a diverse learning community that strives for academic excellence in the Catholic and Jesuit tradition through comprehensive programs rooted in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Easton Inc and the most unlike its peers is Desales University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DESALES UNIVERSITY — $13,000 · EducationDESALES UNIVERSITYCEDAR CREST COLLEGE — $11,000 · EducationCEDAR CREST COLLEGELEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $8,500 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITYMUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $7,000 · EducationMUHLENBERG COLLEGEMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherMORAVIAN UNIVERSITYYOURPATH FOR ADULT LEARNERS — $3,000 · OtherYOURPATH FOR ADULT LEA…CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF THE GREATER — $2,000 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNI…GREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · OtherGREATER VALLEY YOUNG M…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $2,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BA…THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC — $2,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF…MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE GREATER — $1,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE…THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN — $4,500 · Human ServicesTHIRD STREET ALLI…BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH HOMES INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesBIBLE FELLOWSHIP …LIFEPATH FOUNDATION — $2,100 · Human ServicesLIFEPATH FOUNDATI…VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY YOUTH HOUS…MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT — $2,000 · Human ServicesMOMS OFFERING MOM…CAMELOT FOR CHILDREN — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMELOT FOR CHI…The Common Place Inc — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Common Plac…KIDSPEACE NATIONAL CENTERS FOR KIDS IN CRISIS — $2,000 · HealthFlint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc — $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$39,500Other$17,000Human Services$13,600Youth Development$12,000Health$2,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDESALES UNIVERSITY — $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR CREST COLLEGE — $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAMELOT FOR CHILDREN — $7,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Common Place Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH HOMES INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEPATH FOUNDATION — $2,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSPEACE NATIONAL CENTERS FOR KIDS IN CRISIS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlint Hill Farm Educational Center Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF EASTON INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · Leona Gruber Charitable Trust · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust · The Century Fund Trust · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Air Products Foundation · Ppl Foundation · Seruga R Char · Essa Bank & Trust Foundation · Harry C Trexler Estate · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Caroline J S Sanders Td

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles a and Leona K Gruber Fnd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph