Skip to content
Charidy Global Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Charidy Global Foundation

CHARIDY GLOBAL FOUNDATION was formed for the charitable purpose of increasing the giving space through multiple different means and create educational and technological tools to enable and empower people to give more money to nonprofit organizations.

$2.6M
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$279k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Religion$881kScience & Tech$314kFood & Nutrition$48kInternational$47kHuman Services$42kCommunity Improvement$34kPhilanthropy$8k
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $671,667, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,589,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,917,433 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k8 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $224k
  • $250k+1 grant · $279k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$457k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRASSHOPPER LLC$279,000
GOSEPHARDIC INC$173,579
HALACHA EDUCATION CENTER$50,196
LIOR GROUP LLC$34,460
TSEDAKA CENTER INC$29,517
CHABAD RELIEF PROJECT$15,899
LEV CHABAD$13,201
CONGREGATION CHASDEI YITZCHOK$12,752
CHABAD YOUTH$10,000
BRIT YOSEF ITZCHAK OF AMERICA INC$8,874
EZRAT ISRAEL$7,367
KOLEL TORAH INC$7,337
CHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL INC$6,748
CHABAD CHAYIL$6,183
JEWISH EMERYVILLE$5,973
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF ATLANTA: $13k → 13%TSEDAKA CENTER INC: $30k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NV
NJ
CA
MO
MD
AZ
GA
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $1.5M on the FY2023 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, $1.5M to organizations and $35k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$909k · 59% · 12 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE TO INDIGENTS

Central America and the Caribbean$336k · 22% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

Sub-Saharan Africa$194k · 13% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

South America$89k · 6% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$15k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$884k · 12 repeat orgs$489k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
30

Total granted

$884k
$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+7%

Still filing today

33%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
ReligionPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GRASSHOPPER LLC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $314k
  • GS
    GO SEPHARDIC INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $197k
  • KT
    KOLEL TORAH INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $87k · revenue -44%

Funded once

  • CI
    CHABAD-LUBAVITCH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $39k
  • TT
    THE TORAH NUCLEUS OF CENTER REHAVI
    one grant, 2021 · $29k
  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER CHABAD OFWEST QUEENS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
4
Chabad Jewish Center of Stamford Inc

servicing the stamford Jewish community with religious and education programs

Food & Nutrition
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Ccf New York Jewish French Community Center of Ny Inc

To further French Jewish Culture, help integration of American in France and French in USA concerning Jewish Culture

Religion
7
Congregation Jewish Spiritual Shabbas Inc
Religion
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
10
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
11
Chasudim Foundation
—
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kolel Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chabad of Downtown Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRASSHOPPER LLC: $314,000 · OtherGRASSHOPPER LLCGO SEPHARDIC INC: $197,014 · OtherGO SEPHARDIC INCJEWISH EMERYVILLE: $44,560 · OtherCHABAD-LUBAVITCH INC: $39,436 · OtherLIOR GROUP LLC: $34,460 · Other+32 more: $355,318 · Other+32 moreKOLEL TORAH INC: $86,633 · ReligionKOLEL TOR…SOLOMON CENTER INC: $12,191 · ReligionSOLOMON C…CHABAD YOUTH QUEENS INC: $10,000 · ReligionCHABAD YO…MERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $5,409 · ReligionFRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC: $49,566 · PhilanthropyCHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL: $24,748 · PhilanthropyCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $7,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP: $50,196 · EducationMIFAL HAFATZA INC: $5,500 · EducationCHABAD RELIEF PROJECT INC: $40,132 · Food & NutritionTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA: $7,772 · Food & NutritionNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $46,520 · InternationalTSEDAKA CENTER INC: $29,517 · Human ServicesFriendship Circle of Atlanta Inc: $12,500 · Human Services
Other$984,788Religion$114,233Philanthropy$81,814Education$55,696Food & Nutrition$47,904International$46,520Human Services$42,017

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOLEL TORAH INC: $86,633 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP: $50,196 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC: $49,566 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $46,520 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTSEDAKA CENTER INC: $29,517 over 1y, 28% of budgetCHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL: $24,748 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEV CHABAD INC: $13,201 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFriendship Circle of Atlanta Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSOLOMON CENTER INC: $12,191 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA: $7,772 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD OF DOWNTOWN INC: $6,640 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMIFAL HAFATZA INC: $5,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMERKAZ HATORAH COMMUNITY KOLLEL: $5,409 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KOLEL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MAYANOT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD RELIEF PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TSEDAKA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF ARGENTINA RELIEF APPEAL ↗
  • Who funds LEV CHABAD INC ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Circle of Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOLOMON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD YOUTH QUEENS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds CROWN HEIGHTS CHEVRA SIMCHAS SHABBOS V'YOM TOV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rebbe's Partnership F…Jewish Communal FundNash Charity Foundati…Jewish Community Foun…Krinsky Foundation IncJewish Federation of …Regals FoundationThe Rapoport Family F…Kolel Torah IncHager FoundationGoldner Family Founda…The Ojc Fund
Rebbe's Partnership FoundationNY25.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Krinsky Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Regals Foundation · The Rapoport Family Foundation Inc · Kolel Torah Inc · Hager Foundation · Goldner Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charidy Global Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charidy Global Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charidy Global’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home