Skip to content

· Public charity

Chapel & York Foundation Inc

The foundation seeks to support valuable work done by charitable and educational organizations worldwide.

$25M
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$219k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of Chapel & York Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Trustees Of Dartmouth College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Chapel & York Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $336k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’18
2
’20
5
’21
1
’22
7
’23
6
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.1MReligion$100kEnvironment$56kPublic Benefit$49kHealth$29kArts & Culture$22kCivil Rights$10kInternational$1k
02FY2021 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $336,207, the rows itemized in this filing. The $24,500,141 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,163,934 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $272k
$21,678
Median grant
3
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON COLLEGE - TRISH BARRIGAN$219,395
BOSTON COLLEGE$52,223
CENTER FOR EMERGING VISUAL ARTISTS$21,678
FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC$19,601
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY$16,858
ANATOLIA COLLEGE$6,452
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOSTON COLLEGE - TRISH BARRIGAN: $219k → 7%ANATOLIA COLLEGE: $7k → 16%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $70k → 11%CENTER FOR EMERGING VISUAL ARTISTS: $22k → 22%THICH NHAT HANH FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%SHULE FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%FAIR TRIALS: $10k → 14%ANATOLIA COLLEGE: $67k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $32k → 8%FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $20k → 6%TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $356k → 10%BOSTON COLLEGE - TRISH BARRIGAN: $53k → 7%ANATOLIA COLLEGE: $6k → 16%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $22k → 11%FRIENDS OF MASSEY UNIVERSITY: $105k → 14%ANATOLIA COLLEGE: $6k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $727 → 8%FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS: $9k → 6%TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $116k → 10%BOSTON COLLEGE: $52k → 7%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $17k → 11%THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $49k → 14%CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
MD
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $41M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$32M · 77% · 124 grants

Stated purpose: CHILDREN; HEALTH · ARTS AND CULTURE; EDUCATION · EDUCATION

East Asia and the Pacific$9.1M · 22% · 34 grants

Stated purpose: ENVIRONMENT · EDUCATION · HEALTH; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY

Sub-Saharan Africa$271k · 1% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: ARTS AND CULTURE · HEALTH · EDUCATION

North America (Canada and Mexico)$81k · 0% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: EDUCATION · GENERAL SUPPORT

Central America and the Caribbean$25k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: EDUCATION; HUMAN SERVICES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 38% of Chapel & York Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Chapel & York Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$647k · 7 repeat orgs$286k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$647k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $153k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $325k · revenue +26%
  • CM
    Carnegie Mellon University
    4× · 2020–2024 · $118k · revenue +35%
  • AC
    ANATOLIA COLLEGE TR UW XXXXX8007
    2× · 2023–2024 · $73k · revenue +24% · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • FT
    FAIR TRIALS AMERICAS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
2
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
3
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
4
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
9
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carnegie Mellon University; the most unlike its peers is Anatolia College Tr Uw XXXXX8007. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Trustees of Dartmouth College: $471,423 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $324,611 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEFriends of Massey University: $104,651 · EducationFriends of Massey UniversityANATOLIA COLLEGE TR UW XXXXX8007: $73,130 · EducationANATOLIA COLLEGE TR UW XXXXX8007+2 more: $46,120 · EducationCarnegie Mellon University: $118,225 · OtherCarnegie Mellon Un…PLUM VILLAGE COMMUNITY OF ENGAGED BUDDHISM INC: $100,000 · OtherPLUM VILLAGE COMMU…FAIR TRIALS AMERICAS: $9,800 · OtherHealth in Harmony: $56,261 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $28,739 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $48,618 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR EMERGING VISUAL ARTISTS LTD: $21,678 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,019,935Other$228,025Health$86,000Arts & Culture$70,296

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $471,423 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $324,611 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $118,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Massey University: $104,651 over 1y, 34% of budgetANATOLIA COLLEGE TR UW XXXXX8007: $73,130 over 2y, 44% of budgetHealth in Harmony: $56,261 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $48,618 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $32,696 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $28,739 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EMERGING VISUAL ARTISTS LTD: $21,678 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF ANATOLIA COLLEGE: $13,424 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHULE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chapel & York Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chapel & York Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chapel & York Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Chapel & York Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chapel & York’s filings →

More from the funding graph