Skip to content

· Private foundation

Change Create Transform Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$223kEmployment$8kYouth Development$6kCommunity Improvement$4kHousing & Shelter$2kCrime & Legal$1k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$594k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE)$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO$2,500
ASCEND FOUNDATION$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLIS$2,500
BRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$2,500
UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION$2,500
READ ALLIANCE$750
MINORITY BAR ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLIS: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%BRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $8k → 28%GRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ASCEND FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE): $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - NEWARK: $5k → 8%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLIS: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%BRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 28%GRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%ASCEND FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE): $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $5k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - NEWARK: $5k → 8%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLIS: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 28%GRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE): $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $5k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - NEWARK: $3k → 8%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLIS: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 28%GRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE): $4k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - NEWARK: $3k → 8%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLIS: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO FOUNDATION: $3k → 13%BRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 28%GRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE): $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $3k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - NEWARK: $3k → 8%MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%A BETTER CHANCE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
NJ
CA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 15 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +130% since the first grant, against +103% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$234k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+130%
+103%

Still filing today

40%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +207%
  • UA
    University at Buffalo Foundation Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +138%
  • RA
    READ ALLIANCE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • CH
    Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential forgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +103%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FORUM OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Benedict College

Benedict college is committed to providing transformative learning experiences characterized by high quality academic, co-curricular and extra-curricular programming, intentionally designed to develop superior cultural and professional…

Education
5
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
6
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
7
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
8
Brooklyn Law School

To provide students with the knowledge, skills, ethical values needed for a career in law.

Education
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Wilberforce University Wilberforce University

Wilberforce university is a historically black college and university and the primary mission is to engage, support, and assist students in identifying and preparing for their respective purposes in life as social change agents, social…

Education
12
Breakthrough New York Inc

Breakthrough new york empowers motivated students from low-income backgrounds to graduate from college and pursue a fulfilling career. our ten-year, tuition-free program provides students with the opportunities, resources, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Today's Students Tomorrow's Teachers; the most unlike its peers is Bright Beginnings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO: $30,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGOSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE): $26,500 · OtherSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION (EDWARDSVILLE)UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLIS: $25,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS AT MINNEAPOLISGRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,500 · OtherGRINNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATIONRUTGERS UNIVERSITY - NEWARK: $18,000 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITY - NEWARKUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $15,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONASCEND FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherA BETTER CHANCE INC: $5,500 · Other+6 more: $7,945 · OtherMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 · EducationMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERS…University at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $21,520 · EducationUniversity at Buffalo F…READ ALLIANCE INC: $3,650 · EducationREAD ALLIANCE INCChicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for: $1,950 · Education+2 more: $650 · EducationBRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,500 · PhilanthropyBRONX COMMU…African American Men of Westchester Inc: $2,350 · Community ImprovementWOMEN'S FORUM OF NEW YORK INC: $1,550 · Community Improvement
Other$162,445Education$50,770Philanthropy$25,500Community Improvement$3,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $25,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetMONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc: $21,520 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREAD ALLIANCE INC: $3,650 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAfrican American Men of Westchester Inc: $2,350 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetChicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for: $1,950 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN'S FORUM OF NEW YORK INC: $1,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTODAY'S STUDENTS TOMORROW'S TEACHERS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRONX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds A BETTER CHANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds READ ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds African American Men of Westchester Inc ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FORUM OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL URBAN TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TODAY'S STUDENTS TOMORROW'S TEACHERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Change Create Transform Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Change Create Transform Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Change Create Transform Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Change Create Transform Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Change Create Transform’s filings →

    More from the funding graph