Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chandler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$335kInternational$264kEducation$158kHealth$39kHuman Services$24kFood & Nutrition$17kArts & Culture$5kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE HERE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$35,500
SAN RAFAEL CHURCH$20,034
GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL$20,000
BAPTIST COLLEGE OF FLORIDA$20,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SLOCOMB$10,275
TIME MISSIONS$6,000
GENEVA COUNTY COMMUNITY CHURCH MOBILE FOOD PANTRY$3,500
PLACE OF GRACE CHURCH$3,000
HOPE REMEMBERED$3,000
WIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME$2,500
WHOLE HEART MISSIONS$2,480
LOVE A CHILD$2,000
CHILD OUTREACH MINISTRY$2,000
BIGHOUSE FOUNDATION$1,000
GENEVA COUNTY BAPTIST ASSOCIATION$751
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BIGHOUSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%BIGHOUSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%BIGHOUSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%BIGHOUSE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%BIGHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%BIGHOUSE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 41% of Chandler Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 51% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 18%.

Chandler Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$801k · 19 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$801k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+62%

Still filing today

26%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOPE HERE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +13% · 41% of their budget
  • HB
    Honduras Bapt Med & Dental Mission Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +13%
  • CL
    CHRISTIAN LIGHT SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • FH
    FREEDOM HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WF
    WEST FLORIDA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • TF
    TRUE FREEDOM MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Ministries for Haiti Inc
—
2
Children's Hope

Caring for children, strengthening families, and serving communities in haiti to bring about lasting transformation.

Human Services
3
Hope Christian Ministries International

Ministries

Religion
4
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
5
Orphans Hope International
—
6
Haiti's Childrens Hope Organization

Serving childing and the community through a christian school, feeding clinic, and medical clinic in the rural area of morne barbeau and destra, haiti.

Education
7
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
8
Touch the World Ministries Inc

To seek to proclaim the name of Jesus Christ, to promote Christian principles and the spiritual and physical well being of the world. Major programs include: Orphan ministries, including building orphanages, feeding and educating children,…

Religion
9
Josiahs House

Oversee housing, education and needs of orphaned/foster children in the Dominican Republic who have been placed in the care of Josiah's House and live in housing provided by Josiah's House.

International
10
Prepare the Way Ministry

Education, Humanitarian, Community outreach and evangelism ministry. Provide Orphan Care, Train Youth in Career Paths, Train Pastors and Others in Bible School, Prison Ministry, Provide Elementary School for about 300 Children

International
11
Zion Orphan Home
—
12
Hope of Honduras Inc

Organization operates a children's home in Honduras that provides food, clothing, shelter, medical care and education to abused and abandonded children in need.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Love a Child Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bighouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAPTIST UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INC: $145,000 · OtherBAPTIST UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA INCGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $118,701 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONALSAN RAFAEL CHURCH: $56,427 · OtherSAN RAFAEL CHURCHFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SLOCOMB: $55,275 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH SLOCOMBFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SLOCOMB: $49,150 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF SLOCOMBHonduras Bapt Med & Dental Mission Inc: $36,710 · OtherHonduras Bapt Med & Dental Mission IncMT GILEAD BAPTIST CHURCH: $19,245 · Other+23 more: $82,682 · Other+23 moreHOPE HERE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $229,835 · InternationalHOPE HERE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES…CHRISTIAN LIGHT SCHOOL INC: $25,000 · InternationalCHRISTIAN LIGHT SCHOOL INC+2 more: $3,000 · InternationalBIGHOUSE INC: $13,334 · Human ServicesWIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesTRUE FREEDOM MINISTRIES: $5,000 · ReligionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$563,190International$257,835Human Services$15,834Religion$5,000Health$2,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE HERE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC: $229,835 over 9y, 41% of budgetHonduras Bapt Med & Dental Mission Inc: $36,710 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN LIGHT SCHOOL INC: $25,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetBIGHOUSE INC: $13,334 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHOPE REMEMBERED: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE A CHILD INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONETWENTYSEVEN MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE HERE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Honduras Bapt Med & Dental Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN LIGHT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BIGHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUE FREEDOM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE REMEMBERED ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds LOVE A CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ONETWENTYSEVEN MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC6.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chandler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chandler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Love a Child Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chandler’s filings →

More from the funding graph