Skip to content
Chaim Maleh Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Chaim Maleh Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MHuman Services$202kPhilanthropy$132kEducation$61kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$2kEnvironment$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$824Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$10,003
Median grant
1
States reached
$625k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$95,663
AF OF SFATH EMETH YE$39,100
MOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM$14,750
LIKRAS SHABBOS$10,520
CONG TOLDOS YEHUDA$10,003
AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC$10,000
KOLEL PNEI MENACHEM$9,000
CONG DARKEI CHAIM$6,000
NACHZIK CHAZAK$5,000
KOLEL MATEH EFRAIM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANEINI INC: $22k → 11%ANEINI INC: $8k → 11%ANEINI INC: $750 → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $233 → 11%BETH OLOTH: $10 → 14%EIM LEAH INC: $150 → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $55 → 11%EIMLEAH: $50 → 11%CHASDEI YONA MEIR INC: $18 → 14%NACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $27k → 20%NACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $20k → 20%NACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $13k → 20%NACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $6k → 20%NACHZIK CHAZAK: $5k → 20%EZRAS CHOLIM D'SATMAR INC: $300 → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $10k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $1k → 20%TIKVE LEDOROS INC: $1k → 20%KOLLEL BAIS YISRAEL: $650 → 20%KOLLEL BAIS YISRAEL: $600 → 20%KOLLEL BAIS YISRAEL: $500 → 20%A TIME: $200 → 20%MISASKIM: $300 → 20%TEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA INC: $180 → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $175 → 20%RENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $175 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $220 → 20%TEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA INC: $100 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $180 → 20%ASHREINU INC: $25 → 20%MISASKIM: $36 → 20%AVIHEM INC: $10 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 75 repeat orgs$425k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

75 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 70 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
154

Total granted

$1.7M
$356k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+26%

Still filing today

32%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $190k · revenue +3%
  • LS
    Likras Shabbos Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $135k · revenue +42%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA
    6× · 2018–2023 · $132k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • CK
    CONGREGATION KEREN ECRAH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • YM
    YESHIVA MEOR ENAIM
    one grant, 2021 · $31k
  • TH
    Tzohar Halev Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
3
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
8
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
9
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
10
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
11
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
12
Rashbi Tehillim Incorporated
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aneini Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 236 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/65
Grantees still filing
44/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS: $129,382 · OtherVARIOUSCONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INC: $89,647 · OtherCONGREGATION TOLDOS YEHUDA INCCONGREGATION KEREN ECRAH INC: $80,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEREN ECRAH INCIndividual grant recipient: $54,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHESED HEY YUD VOV: $46,000 · OtherYESHIVA YAGDIL TORAH: $45,578 · OtherAF OF SFATH EMETH YE: $39,100 · OtherLEV SOMEINCH: $38,950 · OtherFRIENDS OF MOSDOS GOOR: $36,445 · Other+145 more: $434,274 · Other+145 moreMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC: $450,000 · ReligionMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $190,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL IN…Likras Shabbos Inc: $134,634 · ReligionLikras Shabbos IncGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC: $30,000 · Religion+11 more: $41,547 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $131,500 · Philanthropy+3 more: $2,362 · PhilanthropyNACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $70,100 · Human ServicesANEINI INC: $30,250 · Human ServicesAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Human Services+10 more: $7,104 · Human ServicesTzohar Halev Inc: $30,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $2,500 · Education+3 more: $445 · EducationOUR PLACE INC: $1,800 · Youth DevelopmentCHARIDY INC: $715 · Youth DevelopmentBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH: $612 · HealthSHAAREI ZION YERUSHALYIM INC: $400 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $380 · HealthREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $250 · HealthBINA STROKE AND BRAIN INJURY ASSISTANCE INC: $180 · HealthHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $126 · HealthQUALITY OF LIFE IN MEMORY OF SHILOM NEUMAN: $100 · Health
Other$994,276Religion$846,181Philanthropy$133,862Human Services$117,454Education$32,945Youth Development$2,515Health$2,048

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC: $450,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC: $190,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetLikras Shabbos Inc: $134,634 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA: $131,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetNACHZIK CHAZAK INC: $70,100 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetANEINI INC: $30,250 over 3y, 97% of budgetGLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTzohar Halev Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetMOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC: $24,307 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetZECHER AVROHOM INC: $12,063 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $2,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $1,800 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetKOLLEL BAIS YISRAEL: $1,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF LENEFESH TIDRESHENU INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $1,357 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YESHIVA SIFSEI TZADIK: $1,201 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKEREN HACHESED MIAMI INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARIDY INC: $715 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBOROUGH PARK VOLUNTEER OF HATZOLAH: $612 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HASC INC: $572 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRACHEL'S PLACE CHARITABLE TRUST: $562 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $505 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTZEDEK ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUPATH RAMBAHN KOLEL POLIN: $460 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRENEWAL OF LIFE INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $336 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEZRAS CHOLIM D SATMAR INC: $300 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMERKAZ HATZEDAKA CORP: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $288 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEHILLAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA FOUNDATION INC: $280 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEIM LEAH INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHR MEIR UBRACHA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYL HEARTS Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBADEK'D INC: $180 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHAZON INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBINA STROKE AND BRAIN INJURY ASSISTANCE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC: $170 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC: $165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAH EMERGENCY AIR RESPONSE TEAM INC: $126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DESTINY FOUNDATION: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUALITY OF LIFE IN MEMORY OF SHILOM NEUMAN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS HAMISHPACHA TAHAREINU: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORASHA VADAAT MENUCHAT OLAMIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIFERET MOSHE BETZALEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Likras Shabbos Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SFATH EMETH YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds NACHZIK CHAZAK INC ↗
  • Who funds ANEINI INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL CENTER OF GUR INC ↗
  • Who funds Tzohar Halev Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS PNEI MENACHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds ZECHER AVROHOM INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundFriends of Mosdot GoorJack Adjmi Family Fou…Zecher Avrohom IncBirchas Mordechai Cha…The Tzedakah Foundati…Westlawn FoundationJ & E Wolf Foundation…Zichron Chaim Charity…Ahavat Yisroel Humani…Greenzweig Family Fou…The Fishoff Family Fo…
The Ojc FundNY96.7× affinity118 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · The Tzedakah Foundation · Westlawn Foundation · J & E Wolf Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc · Greenzweig Family Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chaim Maleh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chaim Maleh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 236 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chaim Maleh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home