Skip to content

· Public charity

Chabad on Campus International Inc

Our vision is to champion robust jewish life and learning on college campuses around the world.

$8.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
170
Grants FY2025still arriving
36
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$21MInternational$1.9MYouth Development$250kArts & Culture$175kEducation$72kHealth$20kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 170 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 170 grants below total $6,310,635, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,559,282 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,248,647 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $235k
  • $10k–50k117 grants · $2.9M
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$22,122
Median grant
36
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE$1,114,308
FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMM CIS$462,963
CHABAD AT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$169,228
CHABAD AT UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$148,856
CHABAD OF THE UNDERGRADS$115,832
CHABAD OF TULANE$103,127
CHABAD OF CHAMPAIGN-URBANA NFP$102,668
CHABAD AT UNIV OF MIA - UNDERGRAD$102,140
CHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$94,939
CHABAD JEWISH STUDENT CENTER AT UCB$93,173
JEWISH HERITAGE PROGRAM$82,194
FRIENDS OF CHABAD ON CAMPUS INC$67,016
CHABAD HOUSE AT UCLA$63,164
CHABAD OF BLOOMINGTON INC$59,791
CHABAD OF QUEENS COLLEGE INC DBA CHABAD ON CAMPUS OF QUEENS$58,599
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHABAD OF BATON ROUGE: $9k → 19%HILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY: $28k → 14%Hillel of Rockland County: $20k → 14%Hillel of Rockland County: $20k → 14%Chabad House at Penn: $14k → 22%Lubavitch House University of Pennsylva: $10k → 22%Chabad House at Penn: $9k → 22%Chabad House at Penn: $8k → 22%Lubavitch House at University of Penn: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 229 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

229 repeat relationships: 142 still active in FY2025, 87 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

229
90

Total granted

$22M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

3%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $346k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    Jewish Heritage Programs
    5× · 2017–2025 · $257k · revenue +30%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $105k · revenue +8%
  • CS
    CHABAD STUDENT CENTER AT UofM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • IN
    Israel Next Generation INC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF BINGHAMTON
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chabad Lubavitch of Prague

To provide unaffiliated Jews with information and the ability to learn about their heritage.

Religion
2
Chabad Jewish Center of Stamford Inc

servicing the stamford Jewish community with religious and education programs

Food & Nutrition
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Chabad of the Abingtons Inc

Operates a religious outreach center which provides for the needs of the memebrs of the local Jewish community. Arranges classes, lectures, holiday programs and clergy services.

Religion
5
Rabbinical Organization - Chabad Lubavitch Inc

Organized lectures, symposiums, attended conference, donations of books to libraries. To promote jewish education.

Religion
6
Chabad of Columbia University

To educate jewish students based on chabad chassidic philosophy, advance their understanding of jewish ideas and foster their jewishness.

—
7
Hillel Foundation at Miami University

Hillel at Miami University, the center of Jewish life on campus, seeks to engage, connect, and empower students to explore their Jewish identity creating a vibrant Jewish community and inspiring the next generation of Jewish leaders.

—
8
Minyan Oneg Shabbat

Religious and educational services

Religion
9
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
10
Chinuch Yahudi

Jewish traditions and heritage enlightment, vocational education

Religion
11
Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc

Chabad of Bensonhurst Inc is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and charitable needs of the Jewish Community.

—
12
Chabad of River North and Fulton Market

Chabad of River North and Fulton Market is an organization dedicated to furthering the religious, educational, and chartable needs of the Jewish Community and /or of the neighbors of River North and Fulton Market.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chabad Jewish Center; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Am Olam. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 342 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE INC: $1,963,311 · OtherJEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE INC+187 more: $16,806,888 · Other+187 moreFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $1,906,713 · PhilanthropyFEDERATIO…CHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC: $394,549 · ReligionJewish Heritage Programs: $257,194 · ReligionChabad Fenway - Huntington Avenue Inc: $133,106 · ReligionCHABAD OF MEDFORD INC: $115,146 · ReligionCHABAD STUDENT CENTER AT UofM: $70,121 · Religion+1 more: $26,460 · ReligionIsrael Next Generation INC: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentHILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $68,359 · Human ServicesLUBAVITCH HOUSE AT PENN INC: $46,400 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $104,635 · InternationalFriends of Lubavitch Inc: $43,345 · Education
Other$18,770,199Philanthropy$1,906,713Religion$996,576Youth Development$250,000Human Services$114,759International$104,635Education$43,345

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC: $1,906,713 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC: $394,549 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetJewish Heritage Programs: $257,194 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetIsrael Next Generation INC: $250,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $104,635 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCHABAD STUDENT CENTER AT UofM: $70,121 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetHILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $68,359 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetLUBAVITCH HOUSE AT PENN INC: $46,400 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetFriends of Lubavitch Inc: $43,345 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetSwarthmore Chabad: $26,460 over 2y, 9.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEDERATION OF JEWISH COMMUNITIES OF THE CIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Heritage Programs ↗
  • Who funds Israel Next Generation INC ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Fenway - Huntington Avenue Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rebbe's Partnership FoundationNY58.6× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rebbe's Partnership Foundation · Israel on Campus Coalition Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Kolel Torah Inc · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Rav-Noy Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Seed the Dream Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Huberfeld Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chabad on Campus International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chabad on Campus International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chabad on Campus International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Chabad on Campus International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 342 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chabad on Campus International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph