Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ch& Helen Sheridan Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$352kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA$16,750
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY$9,500
CENTRAL COLLEGE$4,000
LUTHER COLLEGE$4,000
SIMPSON COLLEGE$3,000
INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wartburg College: $2k → 7%COE: $1k → 9%Buena Vista University: $1k → 10%DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 10%WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%Marshalltown Community College: $1k → 11%University of Iowa: $1k → 15%Indian Hills Comm College: $3k → 16%Kirkwood Community College: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$345k · 15 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$345k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-4%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +43%
  • LC
    LUTHER COLLEGE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • CC
    CENTRAL COLLEGE
    4× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALLEN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -6%
  • IH
    Indian Hills Comm College
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • WC
    WARTBURG COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
2
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
3
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
4
Wisconsin Lutheran College Inc

Wisconsin lutheran college is a private, four-year liberal arts college.

—
5
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
6
Eckerd College

The mission of eckerd college is to provide excellent innovative undergraduate liberal arts education and lifelong learning programs in the unique florida environment, within the context of a covenant relationship with the presbyterian…

Education
7
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wartburg College; the most unlike its peers is Indian Hills Community College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA: $103,858 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWAIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY: $90,031 · OtherIOWA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $28,066 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWADES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20,624 · OtherDES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGEINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9,400 · Other+8 more: $27,792 · Other+8 moreWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $33,067 · EducationWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITYLUTHER COLLEGE: $14,832 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGECENTRAL COLLEGE: $13,130 · EducationCENTRAL COLLEGEBuena Vista University: $6,080 · EducationBuena Vista UniversitySimpson College: $6,000 · EducationSimpson College+1 more: $1,600 · Education
Other$279,771Education$74,709

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY: $33,067 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $14,832 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COLLEGE: $13,130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9,400 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetBuena Vista University: $6,080 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSimpson College: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLEN COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARTBURG COLLEGE: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Buena Vista University ↗
  • Who funds Simpson College ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WARTBURG COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fahrney Education Fdtn TrustWI15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fahrney Education Fdtn Trust · Bestenlehner D and F Educational Tr · Ottumwa Regional Legacy Foundation Inc · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ch& Helen Sheridan Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ch& Helen Sheridan Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ch& Helen Sheridan Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph