Skip to content

· Private foundation

CG VI Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$42kHealth$30kHuman Services$26kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$434k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Shriners Hospital for Children$8,000
St Judes Childrens Hospital$8,000
The Filling Station$5,000
Spokane Youth Symphony$5,000
Angels Over Sandpoint$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Kinderhaven: $5k → 12%Kinderhaven: $2k → 12%Angels Over Sandpoint: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83k · 6 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$83k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Festival at Sandpoint Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $21k · revenue +15%
  • FS
    FILLING STATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $17k
  • SJ
    St Judes Childrens Hospital
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k

Funded once

  • YS
    Yakima Symphony Orchestra
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • SC
    Sandpoint Christian School
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cascade Symphony Orchestra Inc

Cascade Symphony Orchestra exists to nourish its musicians and the community by providing inspiring performances of outstanding music, educational outreach to children, opportunities for young musicians to play with the Orchestra, college…

Arts & Culture
2
Bremerton Symphony Association

We unite and enrich west sound communities by sharing a passion for live music, preserving artistic tradition, and breaking barriers to music education.

Arts & Culture
3
Olympia Symphony Orchestra

To provide the highest quality live music to enrich educate and entertain an expanding audience.

—
4
Spokane Symphony Society

The Spokane Symphony is dedicated to providing high quality, professional orchestral performances and education to the Inland Northwest for the purpose of enriching and transforming lives through music and owns and operates the historic…

Arts & Culture
5
Bellevue Youth Symphony Orchestra

Bellevue youth symphony orchestra enhances the lives of student musicians by providing dynamic musical experiences, fostering collaboration, confidence, and personal responsibility through the pursuit of artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
6
Idaho Falls Symphony Society Inc

To provide quality life orchestral experiences of the world's greatest music for the enjoyment, enrichment and education of our audiences and musicians.

Arts & Culture
7
Orchestra Seattle - Seattle Chamber Singer

The mission of Orchestra Seattle | Seattle Chamber Singers is to enrich the quality of life in the Pacific Northwest through performance of great orchestral and choral literature; to introduce Northwest audiences to rarely heard works of…

—
8
Seattle Youth Symphony Orchestras

Empowering youth through excellence in orchestral education.

Arts & Culture
9
Skagit Symphony

Skagit Symphony's mission is to present exceptional orchestral experiences to a growing and inclusive audience; to enrich, entertain, educate, and inspire our community through music.

Arts & Culture
10
Cascade Youth Symphony

Year-long program designed to nurture students enjoyment of music as well as develop their musical skills and self-confidence.

—
11
Oregon Music Festival

Oregon Music Festival's mission is the performance, production, and promotion of classical music through orchestral, choral/orchestra, and chamber music.

Arts & Culture
12
Walla Walla Symphony Society Inc

The Walla Walla Symphony delights and challenges our community by providing live orchestral performances and opportunities for leaning about music.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Festival at Sandpoint Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kinderhaven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FILLING STATION INC: $17,000 · OtherFILLING STATION INCSt Judes Childrens Hospital: $15,000 · OtherSt Judes Childrens HospitalSPOKANE YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $5,000 · OtherSPOKANE YOUTH SYMPHONY INCSandpoint Christian School: $4,000 · OtherSandpoint Christian SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $3,470 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Festival at Sandpoint Inc: $20,500 · Arts & CultureThe Festival at Sandpoint IncYakima Symphony Orchestra: $15,000 · Arts & CultureYakima Symphony Orchestra+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' H…KINDERHAVEN INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesKINDERHAV…ANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $2,000 · Human ServicesANGELS OV…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$44,470Arts & Culture$36,500Health$15,000Human Services$9,000Philanthropy$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Festival at Sandpoint Inc: $20,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYakima Symphony Orchestra: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKINDERHAVEN INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSPOKANE YOUTH SYMPHONY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetANGELS OVER SANDPOINT: $2,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization CG VI Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CG VI Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on CG VI Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph