Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

CG VI Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$42kHealth$30kHuman Services$26kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$434k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Judes Childrens Hospital$8,000
Shriners Hospital for Children$8,000
Spokane Youth Symphony$5,000
The Filling Station$5,000
Angels Over Sandpoint$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Kinderhaven: $5k → 12%Kinderhaven: $2k → 12%Angels Over Sandpoint: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$83k · 6 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$83k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+12%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    The Festival at Sandpoint Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $21k · revenue +20%
  • FS
    FILLING STATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $17k
  • SJ
    St Judes Childrens Hospital
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k

Funded once

  • YS
    Yakima Symphony Orchestra
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +12%
  • SC
    Sandpoint Christian School
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cascade Symphony Orchestra Inc

Cascade Symphony Orchestra exists to nourish its musicians and the community by providing inspiring performances of outstanding music, educational outreach to children, opportunities for young musicians to play with the Orchestra, college…

Arts & Culture
2
Bremerton Symphony Association

We unite and enrich west sound communities by sharing a passion for live music, preserving artistic tradition, and breaking barriers to music education.

Arts & Culture
3
Olympia Symphony Orchestra

To provide the highest quality live music to enrich educate and entertain an expanding audience.

4
Spokane Symphony Society

The Spokane Symphony is dedicated to providing high quality, professional orchestral performances and education to the Inland Northwest for the purpose of enriching and transforming lives through music and owns and operates the historic…

Arts & Culture
5
Bellevue Youth Symphony Orchestra

Bellevue youth symphony orchestra enhances the lives of student musicians by providing dynamic musical experiences, fostering collaboration, confidence, and personal responsibility through the pursuit of artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
6
Idaho Falls Symphony Society Inc

To provide quality life orchestral experiences of the world's greatest music for the enjoyment, enrichment and education of our audiences and musicians.

Arts & Culture
7
Orchestra Seattle - Seattle Chamber Singer

The mission of Orchestra Seattle | Seattle Chamber Singers is to enrich the quality of life in the Pacific Northwest through performance of great orchestral and choral literature; to introduce Northwest audiences to rarely heard works of…

8
Seattle Youth Symphony Orchestras

Empowering youth through excellence in orchestral education.

Arts & Culture
9
Skagit Symphony

Skagit Symphony's mission is to present exceptional orchestral experiences to a growing and inclusive audience; to enrich, entertain, educate, and inspire our community through music.

Arts & Culture
10
Cascade Youth Symphony

Year-long program designed to nurture students enjoyment of music as well as develop their musical skills and self-confidence.

11
Oregon Music Festival

Oregon Music Festival's mission is the performance, production, and promotion of classical music through orchestral, choral/orchestra, and chamber music.

Arts & Culture
12
Walla Walla Symphony Society Inc

The Walla Walla Symphony delights and challenges our community by providing live orchestral performances and opportunities for leaning about music.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Festival at Sandpoint Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kinderhaven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FILLING STATION INC — $17,000 · OtherFILLING STATION INCSt Judes Childrens Hospital — $15,000 · OtherSt Judes Childrens HospitalSPOKANE YOUTH SYMPHONY INC — $5,000 · OtherSPOKANE YOUTH SYMPHONY INCSandpoint Christian School — $4,000 · OtherSandpoint Christian SchoolIndividual grant recipient — $3,470 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Festival at Sandpoint Inc — $20,500 · Arts & CultureThe Festival at Sandpoint IncYakima Symphony Orchestra — $15,000 · Arts & CultureYakima Symphony Orchestra+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' H…KINDERHAVEN INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesKINDERHAV…ANGELS OVER SANDPOINT — $2,000 · Human ServicesANGELS OV…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$44,470Arts & Culture$36,500Health$15,000Human Services$9,000Philanthropy$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Festival at Sandpoint Inc — $20,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYakima Symphony Orchestra — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKINDERHAVEN INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSPOKANE YOUTH SYMPHONY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetANGELS OVER SANDPOINT — $2,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization CG VI Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph