Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cft Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$600k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.0MCivil Rights$634kReligion$208kHuman Services$155kFood & Nutrition$112kHealth$103kInternational$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$300,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$50,000
ALIGHT$20,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$20,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$10,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
ACLU$10,000
MASON CITY FOUNDATION$5,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
UNICEF$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE PROJECT: $1k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
SD
IA
CT
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 28 repeat orgs$860k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
36

Total granted

$1.9M
$462k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+14%

Still filing today

39%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $398k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CK
    COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $60k · revenue +387%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2023–2025 · $52k · revenue +22%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    3× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • A
    ALIGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
Helen Keller International

Guided by her remarkable legacy of its co-founder, helen keller, helen keller intl partners with communities that are striving to overcome longstanding cycles of poverty. by delivering the essential building blocks of good health, sound…

International
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carolina Broadway Theatre Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NIACC: $622,800 · OtherNIACCNIACC FOUNDATION: $480,000 · OtherNIACC FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWAPRESBYTERIAN MISSION AGENCY: $151,500 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN MISSION AGENCYIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · Other+49 more: $543,889 · Other+49 morePARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $12,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $4,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $60,000 · Food & NutritionHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $2,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $33,000 · InternationalALIGHT: $25,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 · International+3 more: $4,000 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $52,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesMASON CITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EnvironmentOne Vision: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,378,189Health$95,000Food & Nutrition$92,000International$72,000Human Services$53,000Environment$30,000Housing & Shelter$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $52,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $33,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMASON CITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOne Vision: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINA BROADWAY THEATRE CO: $4,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH IOWA TRANSITION AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWRIGHT ON THE PARK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFeeding America: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA PUBLIC RADIO INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CORPORATION IOWA CITY IOWA: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds HAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MASON CITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds One Vision ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blanche Carey Martin Charitable TrIA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blanche Carey Martin Charitable Tr · The David & Phyllis Murphy Charitable Foundation · Bertha Stebens Charitable Foundation · First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Farrer Endowment Foundation · United Way of North Central Iowa · Beth E Reinhart Charitable Trust · Tomson Family Foundation Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cft Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cft Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cft’s filings →

More from the funding graph