Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cf Wu Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$11kArts & Culture$7kScience & Tech$7kHuman Services$5kCrime & Legal$5kEnvironment$4kHealth$3kAnimals$3kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,400
Median grant
3
States reached
$484k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Metropolitan Museum of Art$3,500
Great Valley Academy$3,178
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
KVIE$1,400
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Individual grant recipient$750
Gods Love We Deliver$526
Academy of Sciences$379
Great Valley Museum$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZON: $1k → 17%Haven Women's Center-Stanislaus: $1k → 15%Haven Women's CenterStanislaus: $1k → 15%Haven Women's Center-Stanislaus: $772 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 14 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
28

Total granted

$40k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

43%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LQ
    Learning Quest
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k
  • GV
    GREAT VALLEY ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2024–2026 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • MS
    MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • MU
    MISSOURI UNIV OF SCIENCE AND TECH
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • FO
    Family of Dr John Chang-GoFundMe
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • DD
    Dharma Drum Mountain Buddhist Foundation
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
8
Cook Children's Health Care System

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
East Bay Spca

The east bay spca founded in 1874, is proud to be one of the oldest shelters in the country and one of the most innovative in our region. our mission is to transform the lives of cats and dogs by enriching the human-animal bond through…

Animals
11
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
12
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Stanislaus County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
7/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Learning Quest: $5,970 · OtherLearning QuestIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMissouri University of Science & Technology: $3,000 · OtherMissouri University of Science & TechnologyIndividual grant recipient: $2,945 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUniversity of California - Law: $2,000 · OtherMISSOURI UNIV OF SCIENCE AND TECH: $2,000 · OtherCentral Valley Prof Exchange: $1,675 · OtherFamily of Dr John Chang-GoFundMe: $1,650 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $1,818 · Other+26 more: $23,085 · Other+26 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $3,500 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLIT…KVIE INC: $2,600 · Arts & CultureKVIE INCMODESTO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $400 · Arts & CultureMODESTO CH…GREAT VALLEY ACADEMY INC: $4,387 · Education+1 more: $20 · EducationMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $4,020 · EnvironmentHealthy Alternatives to Violent Environm: $2,920 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $3,526 · Food & NutritionBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,200 · AnimalsHumane Society of Stanislaus County: $1,000 · Animals
Other$47,143Arts & Culture$6,500Education$4,407Environment$4,020Human Services$3,920Food & Nutrition$3,526Animals$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREAT VALLEY ACADEMY INC: $4,387 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $4,020 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $3,526 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHealthy Alternatives to Violent Environm: $2,920 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKVIE INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $1,818 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPEX FOR YOUTH INC: $1,224 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS CRISIS CENTER OF STANISLAUS COUNTY: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Stanislaus County: $1,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEL PASSI BASEBALL INC: $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIH Health Foundation: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMODESTO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREAT VALLEY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Alternatives to Violent Environm ↗
  • Who funds KVIE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds APEX FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS CRISIS CENTER OF STANISLAUS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Stanislaus County ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEL PASSI BASEBALL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stanislaus Community FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stanislaus Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cf Wu Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cf Wu Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cf Wu Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cf Wu Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cf Wu’s filings →

    More from the funding graph