Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

CEO Nguyen Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Education$270kEnvironment$42kCrime & Legal$30kRecreation & Sports$24kCommunity Improvement$1kHuman Services$1kScience & Tech$1kFood & Nutrition$866Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $64k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$89k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Trees For Houston$27,000
Fort Bend Children's Discovery$15,000
North Channel Little League$11,592
Child Advocates$10,000
Vail Bench Program$5,000
St Laurence Catholic School$4,050
Nehemiah$2,500
Children's Environmental Literacy Foundation$2,000
Gigi's Playhouse For Downs Syndrome$700
Parks Youth Ranch$600
Nery's Promise$403
Individual grant recipient$125
Individual grant recipient$103
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Children's Environmental Literacy Foundation: $2k → 9%St Laurence Catholic School: $186k → 8%Nehemiah: $3k → 16%Cho-Yeh: $125 → 19%Vail Bench Program: $5k → 7%One Cause: $50 → 5%St Laurence Catholic School: $49k → 8%Children's Museum: $200 → 16%St Laurence Catholic School: $4k → 8%Impact 100: $1k → 16%St Laurence Catholic School: $30 → 8%EB Goal Park: $103 → 16%Parks Youth Ranch: $600 → 8%Houston Museum Natural Science: $1k → 16%Nery's Promise: $403 → 8%Trees For Houston: $27k → 16%Gigi's Playhouse For Downs Syndrome: $700 → 8%Trees For Houston: $12k → 16%Fort Bend Children's Discovery: $15k → 8%Girls On The Run: $139 → 16%Fort Bend Children's Discovery: $15k → 8%Child Advocates: $10k → 16%Fort Bend Children's Discovery: $866 → 8%Child Advocates: $10k → 16%Sugar Land Parks and Recreation: $940 → 8%Child Advocates: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of CEO Nguyen Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

CEO Nguyen Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$340k · 4 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$340k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+13%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCrime & LegalPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Laurence Catholic School
    3× · 2022–2024 · $240k
  • TF
    Trees For Houston
    2× · 2023–2024 · $39k · revenue +70%
  • FB
    Fort Bend Children's Discovery
    2× · 2023–2024 · $31k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • HV
    HIGH VELOCITY YOUTH TRACK CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • I1
    Impact 100
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
2
Collaborative for Children

The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.

Human Services
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
4
The Heritage Society

The Heritage Society (THS) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1954 whose mission is to tell the stories of the diverse history of Houston and Texas through collections, exhibits, the arts, educational programs, film, video, and other…

5
John P McGovern Museum of Health & Medical Science

The Health Museum is an innovative science center that provides an interactive and entertaining experience for all ages, promotes understanding and appreciation of the human body, mind, and spirit, and inspires a lifelong commitment to…

Arts & Culture
6
Houston Freedmen's Town Conservancy Inc

To completely restore Houston Freedmen's Town as a heritage district that provides America with its only Freedmen's Town.

Community Improvement
7
National Children Museum

To inspire children to care about and change the world. National Children's Museum (NCM) is a next generation institution that sparks curiosity and ignites creativity for children under 12 by fostering critical competencies in S.T.E.A.M.…

8
Rebuilding Together Houston

Rebuilding Together Houston is the only organization in Houston and Harris County providing free home repairs to hundreds of families each year. We employ licensed contractors to restore homes to safe, livable conditions, extending each…

Housing & Shelter
9
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

10
Fostering Family

Fostering family dba the riverside project is a 501(c)(3) public charity that on behalf of houston's children and their families, brings together organizations and passionate people working as one to help families heal and children thrive.

Community Improvement
11
Children's Environmental Health Network

The Childrens Environmental Health Network is a national multi-disciplinary organization whose mission is to protect the developing child from environmental hazards and promote a healthier environment.

Health
12
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Father's Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Laurence Catholic School — $239,725 · OtherSt Laurence Catholic SchoolTrees For Houston — $39,000 · OtherTrees For HoustonFort Bend Children's Discovery — $30,866 · OtherFort Bend Children's Discovery+11 more — $15,932 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $30,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD ADV…NORTH CHANNEL LITTLE LEAGUE — $11,592 · Recreation & SportsChildren's Enviromental Literacy Fdn — $2,000 · EducationHouston Museum of Natural Science — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $200 · Arts & CultureFATHER'S CARE INC — $1,150 · PhilanthropyPARKS YOUTH RANCH INC — $600 · Housing & ShelterNerys Promise — $403 · Religion
Other$325,523Crime & Legal$30,000Recreation & Sports$11,592Education$2,000Arts & Culture$1,200Philanthropy$1,150Housing & Shelter$600Religion$403

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTrees For Houston — $39,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Enviromental Literacy Fdn — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFATHER'S CARE INC — $1,150 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHouston Museum of Natural Science — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKS YOUTH RANCH INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNerys Promise — $403 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trees For Houston
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC
  • Who funds NORTH CHANNEL LITTLE LEAGUE
  • Who funds Children's Enviromental Literacy Fdn
  • Who funds FATHER'S CARE INC
  • Who funds Houston Museum of Natural Science
  • Who funds PARKS YOUTH RANCH INC
  • Who funds Nerys Promise
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization CEO Nguyen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph