Skip to content
Central Eastside Industrial Council at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Central Eastside Industrial Council

Our mission is to serve the business interests of our members by advocating for a vibrant, safe, prosperous and welcoming central eastside industrial district.

$70k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$33kCommunity Improvement$20kHousing & Shelter$13kEducation$10kYouth Development$10kEnvironment$10kHuman Services$8kEmployment$7kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $70,043 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $60,043 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$986k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRICKS NEED MORTAR$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HYGENE 4 ALL PDX: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portland Players

To foster interest in Community Theater and Art.

Arts & Culture
2
Future Prairie

Founded in January 2018, Future Prairie is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit queer artist collective in Portland, Oregon. We pay LGBTQIA+ Oregon-based artists to design, curate, and produce art projects that showcase new and better dreams of the…

—
3
Portland Film Festival

Portland film festival is a nonprofit organization dedicated to nurturing filmmakers and audiences and to celebrating the power of a good story. the festival focuses on the people, ideas, technology, skills and artistry behind filmmaking…

Arts & Culture
4
Here Together

Supports homeless services through high earner tax and business profits. (Portland Metro)

—
5
The Everly Project

Our mission is to provide trauma-informed harm reduction services to people who are unhoused in the Portland Metro area. Our focus is on mental health services, nursing care, extreme weather supplies, food and safer use supplies for people…

Health
6
Portland Fruit Tree Project

To increase equitable access to healthful food and strengthen communities by empowering neighbors to share in the harvest and care of city-grown produce.

—
7
Portlanders for Charter Reform

Support passage of Portland City Charter reform

—
8
Operation Nightwatch - Portland

Operation Nightwatch provides nighttime hospitality for Portland's unhoused population. For a few evenings a week, staff and volunteers at thehospitality center provide a safe place, food, socks, blankets, medical care, and welcome our…

Health
9
Portland Taiko

Through innovation and excellence in taiko, Portland Taiko affirms Asian American pride, inspires audiences, builds community, and educates about our heritage and culture.

Arts & Culture
10
Portland Public Library

Portland Public Library is a welcoming cultural center that brings people together and connects them with trusted resources, ideas, experiences, and information. We build a stronger community by inspiring learning, creativity, and…

Education
11
Pdx Saints Love

Our mission is to work to move love forward in the city of Portland. We are an organization focused on building bridges of compassion in order to cultivate restoration in our neighborhoods. Removing barriers and paving a way for equitable…

Human Services
12
Creative Portland Corporation

Creative portland is a nonprofit organization that supports the creative economy through the arts by providing essential resources, by fostering partnerships, and by promoting portland's artistic talents and cultural assets. as the…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Portland Street Art Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Color Outside the Lines. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRICKS NEED MORTAR: $20,000 · OtherBRICKS NEED MORTARPortland Women in Technology Inc: $6,800 · OtherPortland Women in Technology IncBosco-Milligan Foundation Architectural Heritage Center: $5,000 · OtherBosco-Milligan Foundation Architectural H…PORTLAND STREET MEDICINE: $6,000 · OtherPORTLAND STREET MEDICINECITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $5,810 · OtherCITYTEAM MINISTRIESMIRACLE THEATRE GROUP: $15,300 · Arts & CultureMIRACLE THEATRE GROUPPORTLAND STREET ART ALLIANCE: $7,500 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND STREET ART ALLIANC…PORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION …Trash for Peace: $9,940 · EnvironmentTrash for …Human Access Project: $1,500 · EnvironmentHuman Acce…Color Outside The Lines: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentColor Out…Street Books: $10,000 · EducationStreet Bo…HYGIENE4ALL: $8,000 · Human ServicesCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND: $7,391 · Philanthropy
Other$43,610Arts & Culture$28,300Environment$11,440Youth Development$10,000Education$10,000Human Services$8,000Philanthropy$7,391

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIRACLE THEATRE GROUP: $15,300 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetColor Outside The Lines: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetStreet Books: $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTrash for Peace: $9,940 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPORTLAND STREET ART ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND: $7,391 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPortland Women in Technology Inc: $6,800 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPORTLAND STREET MEDICINE: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $5,810 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND OPERA ASSOCIATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBosco-Milligan Foundation Architectural Heritage Center: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHuman Access Project: $1,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Autzen FoundationThe Collins FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…The Larson LegacyRegional Arts & Cultu…Ronald W Naito Md Fou…United Way of the Col…Meyer Memorial TrustRose E Tucker Charita…The Reser Family Foun…Seeding Justice
The Oregon Community FoundationOR25.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Larson Legacy · Regional Arts & Culture Council · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Meyer Memorial Trust · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · The Reser Family Foundation · Seeding Justice

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Eastside Industrial Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Eastside Industrial Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Portland Street Medicine: 32% of income from government
  • Miracle Theatre Group: 6% of income from government
  • Color Outside the Lines: 3% of income from government
  • Trash for Peace: 2% of income from government
  • Portland Opera Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Bosco-Milligan Foundation Architectural Heritage Center: 1% of income from government
  • Portland Street Art Alliance: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $58k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Central Eastside Industrial Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home