Skip to content

· Public charity

Central Carolina Health Network

CENTRAL CAROLINA HEALTH NETWORK is a leader inreducing the spread of hiv through education and preventionexpanding access to quality care for those persons living with hiv/aids

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$229k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$7.5MHousing & Shelter$1.5M
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $944,991, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,705,878 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $760,887 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $872k
$90,540
Median grant
1
States reached
$699k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOSES CONE HEALTH SYSTEM$229,082
HOME CARE PROVIDERS$123,949
TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT$122,254
ACCESS DENTAL CARE$117,547
PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES & SICKLE CELL AGENCY$105,165
GREENSBORO HOUSING AUTHORITY$90,540
WFU HEALTH SERVICES$83,738
THE NEW REIDSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY$23,224
PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES$17,059
ASHEBORO HOUSING AUTHORITY$16,745
FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT$15,688
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $183k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $59k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $23k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $22k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $18k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $18k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $16k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $16k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.1M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$9.1M
$0

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +268%
  • PH
    PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES AND SICKLE CELL AGENCY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $665k · revenue +34%
  • WF
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $584k · revenue +78%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Cumberland Medical Center

    Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

    Health
    2
    Roane County Medical Center

    Roane County Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

    Health
    3
    Piedmont Healthcare Inc

    Piedmont healthcare, inc., ("phc") is organized exclusively for the benefit of, to manage the functions of, and to carry out the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of its subsidiary organizations.

    Health
    4
    Piedmont Hospital Inc

    To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

    Health
    5
    Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
    Health
    6
    Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center Inc

    The mission of piedmont athens regional medical center is to improve the lives and health of those we touch.

    Health
    7
    Rex Hospital Inc

    To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.

    Health
    8
    Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

    To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

    Health
    9
    Atrium Health Inc

    Atrium health will oversee an integrated academic and community health system that is steeped in innovation and poised to reshape the delivery of healthcare and achieve the highest and safest outcomes in the communities it serves.

    Health
    10
    Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc

    To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

    Health
    11
    North Carolina Baptist Hospital

    See schedule o for continuationnorth carolina baptist hospital (at times also referred to as the "hospital or "ncbh or "the filing organization") is an integral part of atrium health wake forest baptist (ahwfb), a preeminent learning…

    Health
    12
    The Medical Center Inc

    To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piedmont Health Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/9
    Grantees still filing
    5/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    GREENSBORO HOUSING AUTHORITY: $1,221,502 · OtherGREENSBORO HOUSING AUTHORITYTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT: $1,172,395 · OtherTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECTACCESS DENTAL CARE: $1,118,623 · OtherACCESS DENTAL CAREPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES AND SICKLE CELL AGENCY: $665,415 · OtherPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES AND SICKLE CELL AGENCYALAMANCE CARES INC: $348,859 · OtherALAMANCE CARES INCTHE NEW REIDSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY: $210,959 · Other+2 more: $199,505 · OtherMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION: $2,302,846 · HealthMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING C…ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $833,382 · HealthALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INCPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC: $226,090 · HealthPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INCWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $583,639 · EducationFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $183,077 · Human Services
    Other$4,937,258Health$3,362,318Education$583,639Human Services$183,077

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION: $2,302,846 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT: $1,172,395 over 8y, 12% of budgetALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC: $833,382 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES AND SICKLE CELL AGENCY: $665,415 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $583,639 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALAMANCE CARES INC: $348,859 over 5y, 53% of budgetPIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC: $226,090 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $183,077 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetRANDOLPH HOSPITAL INC: $90,229 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds MOSES H CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OPERATING CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds THE TRIAD HEALTH PROJECT ↗
    • Who funds ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES AND SICKLE CELL AGENCY ↗
    • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
    • Who funds ALAMANCE CARES INC ↗
    • Who funds PIEDMONT HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
    • Who funds RANDOLPH HOSPITAL INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Central Carolina Health Network funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Carolina Health Network. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Central Carolina Health Network?

      Find your warmest path to Central Carolina Health Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Central Carolina Health Network’s filings →

      More from the funding graph