Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Central Arizona Shelter Services Inc

The Organizations mission is to prevent and end homelessness among individuals and families while advancing compassionate community solutions.

$423k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Housing & Shelter$1.7M
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $25,677 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $423,210 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $397,533 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$25,677
Median grant
1
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION$25,677
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $238k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MAGGIES PLACE: $42k → 11%MAGGIES PLACE: $25k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $30k → 11%COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $55k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $10k → 11%RESILENT HEALTH: $22k → 11%COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $34k → 11%US VETS - PHOENIX: $19k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 11 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+34%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $654k · revenue +8%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST
    2× · 2022–2023 · $214k · revenue +25%
  • AN
    A NEW LEAF
    2× · 2022–2023 · $102k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • HY
    Homeless Youth Connection Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +47%
  • RH
    RESILIENT HEALTH INC FKA PSA BEHAVIORAL HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $22k · revenue +34%
  • US
    UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc

To serve women, families, and veterans by providing temporary housing, resources, individualized case management and a pathway to permanent housing.

Housing & Shelter
2
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
3
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
4
Umom New Day Centers Inc

To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.

Housing & Shelter
5
Against Abuse Inc

To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.

Human Services
6
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter
7
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
8
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
9
Old Pueblo Community Services

Established in 1996, Old Pueblo Community Services has delivered housing and support services for people facing homelessness in Pima County. The organization serves various populations, including families, veterans, youth, individuals with…

Philanthropy
10
House of Refuge Sunnyslope Inc

Our mission is to love, house, and equip men, women and children. coming from chronic unemployment, recovery, or an endless cycle of homelessness, our residents experience a clean, safe home where transforming their life can begin.…

Housing & Shelter
11
The Primavera Foundation Inc

The Primavera Foundation is co creating pathways out of poverty through housing, workforce development, homeownership and financial education, and comprehensive community development.

Housing & Shelter
12
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of the Southwest and the most unlike its peers is United States Veterans Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION — $653,562 · ReligionPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSIONFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX — $251,650 · ReligionFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIXLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST — $213,866 · ReligionLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWESTCommunity Bridges Inc — $89,648 · Human ServicesCommunity Bridg…MAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $66,940 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE …CIRCLE THE CITY — $40,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE THE CITYRESILIENT HEALTH INC FKA PSA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $21,867 · Human ServicesRESILIENT HEALT…UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $19,142 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES V…A NEW LEAF — $101,635 · HealthA NEW LEA…NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC — $39,008 · HealthNATIVE AM…St Joseph the Worker — $94,846 · OtherYWCA Metropolitan Phoenix — $34,999 · OtherLost Our Home Pet Foundation — $74,803 · AnimalsHomeless Youth Connection Inc — $25,000 · Youth Development
Religion$1,119,078Human Services$237,597Health$140,643Other$129,845Animals$74,803Youth Development$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION — $653,562 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE - GREATER PHOENIX — $251,650 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTHWEST — $213,866 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetA NEW LEAF — $101,635 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker — $94,846 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCommunity Bridges Inc — $89,648 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation — $74,803 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $66,940 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC — $39,008 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA Metropolitan Phoenix — $34,999 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRESILIENT HEALTH INC FKA PSA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $21,867 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE — $19,142 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Garcia Family Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · Charities Aid Foundation America · Robert Kemper Corrigan Foundation · The Bob & Renee Parsons Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Central Arizona Shelter Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $271k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph