Skip to content
Centers for Dialysis Care Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Centers for Dialysis Care Foundation

To acquire or receive from any persons, firms, associations, corporations, trusts, or foundations by deed, gift, purchase, bequest, devise, or otherwise, cash, securities, and other property, real and personal, and to hold, administer, manage, invest, reinvest and disburse the principial and income

$3.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$18MHuman Services$30kEducation$28k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $143k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.6M
$68,460
Median grant
2
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTER$3,041,520
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS & DEVELOPMENT$606,000
MINORITY ORGAN & TISSUE TRANP EDUCPRGRAM$75,000
KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO$68,460
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$28,000
AIPNO$20,000
NONPROFIT KIDNEY CARE ALLIANCE$18,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%ELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 14 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$22M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+42%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +65%
  • KF
    KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $727k · revenue +26%
  • MO
    MINORITY ORGAN AND TISSUE TRANSPLANT EDUCATION PROGRAM OF CLEVELAND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $638k · revenue +145% · 69% of their budget

Funded once

  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association of Kidney Patients Inc

AAKP is dedicated to improving the lives and long-term outcome of kidney patients. Cont on Sch O.

Health
2
Dialysis Clinic Inc

The primary responsibility of dialysis clinic inc. (dci) is to provide comprehensive and specialized care to patients living with chronic kidney disease (ckd) and end stage renal disease (esrd).

Health
3
National Kidney Foundation of Michigan Inc

To prevent kidney disease and improve the quality of life for those living with it.

Health
4
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
5
Habib Alrahman Charity Foundation

The mission of habib alrahman charity foundation (hacf) is to establish a kideny center in sudan called hacf kidney center, which will help patients with kidney (renal)problems in sudan. kidney problems are very common in sudan and the…

Health
6
National Kidney Foundation of Hawaii Inc

The mission of the national kidney foundation of hawai'i (nkfh) is to prevent kidney and urinary tract disease, improve the health and well-being of individuals and families affected by this disease, and increase the availability of all…

Health
7
National Kidney Foundation of Illinois

The national kidney foundation of illinois improves the health and well-being of people at risk for or affected by kidney disease through prevention, education, and empowerment.

—
8
National Association of Nephrology Technologists (Nant)

The mission of the national association of nephrology technologists (nant) is to promote the highest quality of care for chronic kidney disease (ckd) patients through education and professionalism. nant's goals are to provide educational…

—
9
Northwest Kidney Centers

Northwest kidney centers' (nkc) mission is to promote the optimal health, quality of life and independence of people with kidney disease through patient care, education and research. northwest kidney centers is a not-for-profit, locally…

Health
10
Central Florida Kidney Centers Inc

Our mission is to provide exceptional dialysis care and services to individuals with end-stage kidney disease throughout central florida. we are dedicated to expanding access to treatment and ensuring all those in need receive quality…

Health
11
National Kidney Foundation of Louisiana Inc

The national kidney foundation of louisiana, inc. is the major statewide voluntary non-profit organization dedicated to preventing kidney disease, improving the health and well-being of individuals affected by the disease and increasing…

—
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kidney Foundation of Ohio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eliza Bryant Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTER: $16,826,701 · HealthCOMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTERUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $3,186,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCKIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC: $726,765 · Health+7 more: $942,714 · HealthAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $408,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PHYSICIANS OF NORTHERN OHIO: $120,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $28,074 · EducationTHE KIDNEY CARE COUNCIL INC: $137,500 · Community ImprovementELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE: $30,000 · Human Services
Health$21,682,180Other$408,000Education$148,074Community Improvement$137,500Human Services$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY DIALYSIS CENTER: $16,826,701 over 9y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $3,186,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC: $726,765 over 9y, 14% of budgetMINORITY ORGAN AND TISSUE TRANSPLANT EDUCATION PROGRAM OF CLEVELAND INC: $637,648 over 9y, 69% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $408,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KIDNEY CARE COUNCIL INC: $137,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetASSOCIATION OF INDIAN PHYSICIANS OF NORTHERN OHIO: $120,000 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $96,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNONPROFIT KIDNEY CARE ALLIANCE: $88,800 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetKIDNEY CARE PARTNERS INC CO FEDERAL HEALTH POLICY STRATEGIES: $45,480 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $35,336 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $33,650 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetELIZA BRYANT VILLAGE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $28,074 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Cleveland FoundationOH19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Centers for Dialysis Care Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Centers for Dialysis Care Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Centers for Dialysis Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home