· Public charity
Center for Social Change Inc
Our mission is to provide services of the highest quality for people with cognitive and developmental disabilities and related disorders including autism that optimize each individual's independence and capabilities, ensure self-determination and rights and, with partnerships in the community, enhances their opportunities to live…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $155k
- $250k+1 grant · $6.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR NEW BEGINNINGS INT'L INC | $6,000,000 |
| HELPING HANDS FOR NATIONS INC | $155,216 |
| WASHINGTON ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY INC | $35,000 |
| SIKH ASSOCIATION OF BALTIMORE INC | $30,100 |
| NUMBERS USA | $30,000 |
| VIKSIT AMRITSAR INVESTMENTS INC | $10,000 |
| SAINT JAMES THE GREATER CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support needy people of any religion worldwide
The Sikh Information Centre is based on Sikhi which stresses unity truth and creativity of a personal spiritual enlightenment The organization strives to develop evaluate and disseminate articles programs and social events at a local…
Education
Educational school scholarships for students
Promote the interests of NED University of Engineering & Technology,by providing educational and financial assistance to deserving students of the University. Promote community integration in the US
India House Foundation is dedicated to the protection of democracy and human rights in India, from the perspective of Indian-Americans based in the USA.
The organizations purpose is for the public benefit the advancement of the Sikh religion, primarily but not exclusively, in particular the ancient practice of meditation.
Foundation for India and Indian Diaspora Studies is an Indian American think tank focussed on research, strategy and awareness institution related to the US policy interests related to India, South Asia and Indo Pacific as well as Indian…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Numbersusa Education & Research Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Insaniyat Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 20% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Al-Mawrid United States Inc ↗
- Who funds FROSTBURG ELKS LODGE 470 ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS FOR NATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds US INDIA SME COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds The Sikh Association of Baltimore ↗
- Who funds IMRAN KHAN CANCER APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds NUMBERSUSA EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INSANIYAT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NAMAL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN INDIAN ↗
- Who funds ALL NEIGHBORS ↗
- Who funds HOLY CROSS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds Sikh American Legal Defense & Education ↗
- Who funds The Cuyahoga Council for Community Urban Redevelopment Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Social Change Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Washington Adventist University — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Center for Social Change Inc?
Find your warmest path to Center for Social Change Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.