Skip to content
Centennial Youth Hockey Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Centennial Youth Hockey Association

Providing a youth hockey program in which every player can develop hockey skills, be challenged, have fun, and participate at a level where these objectives can be achieved.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$569kFood & Nutrition$37kCrime & Legal$18kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $56,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $138,220 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $81,720 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$986k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHS GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB$22,500
CHS BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB$12,500
LINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN POLICE SER$10,000
D10 TIER 1 GIRLS - GREEN GIANTS$6,000
CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS VOLLEY$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%HUGO GOOD NEIGHBOR'S FOOD SHELF: $14k → 6%CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12: $230k → 7%HUGO GOOD NEIGHBOR'S FOOD SHELF: $14k → 6%CHS GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $23k → 7%HUGO GOOD NEIGHBOR'S FOOD SHELF: $10k → 6%CHS BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $20k → 7%HUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK: $6k → 6%CHS GIRLS BLUE LINE CLUB: $18k → 7%HUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK: $6k → 6%CENTENNIAL HS BLUE LINE CLUB: $17k → 7%CHS BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $13k → 7%CENTENNIAL SPORTS ARENA: $11k → 7%CHS GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $10k → 7%LINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN POLICE SER: $10k → 7%CENTENNIAL LAKES LITTLE LEAGUE: $9k → 7%LINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN POLICE SER: $8k → 7%CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL LACROSSE BOO: $7k → 7%CHS BOYS BLUE LINE CLUB: $6k → 7%CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS VOLLEY: $6k → 7%D10 TIER 1 GIRLS - GREEN GIANTS: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 5 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$173k
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
0%

Still filing today

100%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsPublic BenefitFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB
    4× · 2022–2025 · $56k · revenue -3% · 28% of their budget
  • CG
    CENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE C LUB
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue -8%
  • HG
    Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf
    3× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • CS
    CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12
    one grant, 2020 · $230k
  • CI
    Centennial Ice Arena
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • CL
    Centennial Lakes Little League Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Park Hockey Blue Line Club

Sports Fundraising Organization

Recreation & Sports
2
Tb Crunch Girls Hockey Inc
Recreation & Sports
3
Belmont Ranger Youth Hockey Association Inc
—
4
Rhs Boys Hockey Blueline Club

RHS Boys' Hockey Blueline Club is organized to support the athletes, parents, coaches, and administrative staff of The RHS Boys Hockey program by raising funds, conducting events, and recruiting volunteers.

Education
5
Saline High School Prep Hockey Team
Recreation & Sports
6
Centennial Baseball League

Competitive and recreational baseball opportunities

Human Services
7
Panther Blueliners

To support the boys hockey team students of Spring Lake Park High School by raising funds, recruiting volunteers, and holding events.

Education
8
Deer Lakes Hockey Club

Provide the opportunity for students in the Deer Lakes School District to participate in scholastic hockey

Recreation & Sports
9
Livingston Ice Hockey Inc
Recreation & Sports
10
Blackstone Valley High School Hockey Co-Op
Recreation & Sports
11
Foothills Youth Hockey Association

To grow the game of hockey within our market that builds a family culture, welcoming of any and all players ages 4 to 18 years old.

Youth Development
12
Greeley Griffins Hockey Association

Provide Uniforms, Coaching, Ice Rental and Team Building Oppurtunites for Youth from 6-18 years from Greeley and Weld County. Provided Trasnpostaion to Tournaments.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centennial Girls Hockey Blue Line C Lub; the most unlike its peers is Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12: $230,000 · OtherCENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12Centennial Ice Arena: $11,250 · Other+3 more: $21,300 · Other+3 moreCENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $56,015 · Recreation & SportsCENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE …CENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE C LUB: $50,460 · Recreation & SportsCENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE…D10 TIER 1 GIRLS - GREEN GIANTS: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsD10 TIER 1 GIRLS - GREEN GIA…Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf: $37,000 · Food & NutritionHugo Good…LINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN PUBLIC SAFETY: $18,000 · Crime & LegalHUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK: $11,500 · Public Benefit
Other$262,550Recreation & Sports$112,475Food & Nutrition$37,000Crime & Legal$18,000Public Benefit$11,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $56,015 over 4y, 28% of budgetCENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE C LUB: $50,460 over 3y, 23% of budgetHugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf: $37,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetLINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN PUBLIC SAFETY: $18,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetHUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK: $11,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCentennial Ice Arena: $11,250 over 1y, 10% of budgetCentennial Lakes Little League Inc: $8,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetD10 TIER 1 GIRLS - GREEN GIANTS: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Centennial Youth Hockey Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Centennial Youth Hockey Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Centennial Youth Hockey Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home