Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Centennial Youth Hockey Association

Providing a youth hockey program in which every player can develop hockey skills, be challenged, have fun, and participate at a level where these objectives can be achieved.

$338k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Recreation & Sports$569kFood & Nutrition$37kCrime & Legal$18kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$6k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $256,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $338,220 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $81,720 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$680k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOUNDATION$200,000
CHS GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB$22,500
CHS BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB$12,500
LINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN POLICE SER$10,000
D10 TIER 1 GIRLS$6,000
CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS VOLLEY$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%HUGO GOOD NEIGHBOR'S FOOD SHELF: $14k → 6%CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12: $230k → 7%HUGO GOOD NEIGHBOR'S FOOD SHELF: $14k → 6%CHS GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $23k → 7%HUGO GOOD NEIGHBOR'S FOOD SHELF: $10k → 6%CHS BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $20k → 7%HUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK: $6k → 6%CHS GIRLS BLUE LINE CLUB: $18k → 7%HUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK: $6k → 6%CENTENNIAL HS BLUE LINE CLUB: $17k → 7%CHS BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $13k → 7%CENTENNIAL SPORTS ARENA: $11k → 7%CHS GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB: $10k → 7%LINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN POLICE SER: $10k → 7%CENTENNIAL LAKES LITTLE LEAGUE: $9k → 7%LINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN POLICE SER: $8k → 7%CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL LACROSSE BOO: $7k → 7%CHS BOYS BLUE LINE CLUB: $6k → 7%NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOUNDATION: $200k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$173k · 5 repeat orgs$469k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$173k
$257k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
0%

Still filing today

100%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $212k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsPublic BenefitFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB
    4× · 2022–2025 · $56k · revenue -3% · 28% of their budget
  • CG
    CENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE C LUB
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue -8%
  • HG
    Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf
    3× · 2021–2024 · $37k · revenue -9%

Funded once

  • CS
    CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12
    one grant, 2020 · $230k
  • CI
    Centennial Ice Arena
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue 0%
  • CL
    Centennial Lakes Little League Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Park Hockey Blue Line Club

Sports Fundraising Organization

Recreation & Sports
2
Wbl Girls Hockey Boosters Inc

WBL Girls Hockey Boosters, Inc. is organized to support the athletes, parents, coaches, and administrative staff of The White Bear Lake High School Girls Hockey program by raising funds, conducting events, and recruiting volunteers.

Education
3
Centennial Baseball League

Competitive and recreational baseball opportunities

Human Services
4
Panther Blueliners

To support the boys hockey team students of Spring Lake Park High School by raising funds, recruiting volunteers, and holding events.

Education
5
Rhs Boys Hockey Blueline Club

RHS Boys' Hockey Blueline Club is organized to support the athletes, parents, coaches, and administrative staff of The RHS Boys Hockey program by raising funds, conducting events, and recruiting volunteers.

Education
6
Tb Crunch Girls Hockey Inc
Recreation & Sports
7
Saline High School Prep Hockey Team
Recreation & Sports
8
Creek Hockey Club

Strive to provide a positive, meaningful, player development environment that supports fair play and good sportsmanship. Our emphasis is centered on family, education, self-esteem, teamwork, and personal integrity for our players, coaches…

Recreation & Sports
9
Deer Lakes Hockey Club

Provide the opportunity for students in the Deer Lakes School District to participate in scholastic hockey

Recreation & Sports
10
Centennial Youth Hockey Association

Providing a youth hockey program in which every player can develop hockey skills, be challenged, have fun, and participate at a level where these objectives can be achieved.

Youth Development
11
Nlv Ice Hockey Booster Club

NLV ice hockey booster club mission is to introduce and offer youth of the area and surrounding communities the opportunity to participate in the game of ice hockey. The goal is to give kids a chance to enjoy a positive, character building…

Recreation & Sports
12
Chaska Area Competitive Junior Curling Club

Curling Club for High School Athletes

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centennial Girls Hockey Blue Line C Lub and the most unlike its peers is Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOUNDATIONCENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB — $56,015 · Recreation & SportsCENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUBCENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE C LUB — $50,460 · Recreation & SportsCENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE C LUBCENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12 — $230,000 · OtherCENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 12Centennial Ice Arena — $11,250 · Other+4 more — $27,300 · Other+4 moreHugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf — $37,000 · Food & NutritionLINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN PUBLIC SAFETY — $18,000 · Crime & LegalHUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK — $11,500 · Public Benefit
Recreation & Sports$306,475Other$268,550Food & Nutrition$37,000Crime & Legal$18,000Public Benefit$11,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTENNIAL BOYS HOCKEY BLUE LINE CLUB — $56,015 over 4y, 28% of budgetCENTENNIAL GIRLS HOCKEY BLUE LINE C LUB — $50,460 over 3y, 23% of budgetHugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf — $37,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetLINO LAKES VOLUNTEERS IN PUBLIC SAFETY — $18,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetHUGO YELLOW RIBBON NETWORK — $11,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCentennial Ice Arena — $11,250 over 1y, 10% of budgetCentennial Lakes Little League Inc — $8,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Centennial Youth Hockey Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph