Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Centennial Lending a Hand Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Philanthropy$60kHuman Services$20kHousing & Shelter$18kEducation$18kReligion$15kMembership Benefit$13kFood & Nutrition$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SAVA CENTER$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING$2,000
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$2,000
VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT$1,500
MERIDIAN TRUST FOUNDATION$1,500
FRIENDS OF FOSTER FAMILIES$1,500
HOPE KIDS COLORADO$1,500
NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR$1,500
CARBON VALLEY SANTA COPS$1,500
CHILDSAFE COLORADO$1,500
ST VRAIN FOUNDATION$1,000
GRACEFUL OAKS YOUTH RANCH$1,000
COAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FREEDOM REVIVED: $500 → 10%CARBON VALLEY HELP CENTER: $500 → 9%A WOMANS PLACE: $1k → 11%WINDSOR GIVES: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 46% of Centennial Lending a Hand Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 45% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Centennial Lending a Hand Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$57k · 10 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
25

Total granted

$57k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+18%

Still filing today

50%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +22%
  • LH
    LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +24%
  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AC
    ATLANTIC CITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHOICE CREDIT UNION
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
2
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
3
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
4
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
5
Routt County Crisis Support

We support, guide, and connect the community and individuals in times of crisis.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Estes Valley Crisis Advocates Inc

To provide crisis intervention, advocacy and support to victims of crime. The EVCA operates a Community Safe House to house victims of domestic violence and provides office and meeting space to the Organization

Community Improvement
7
Colorado Village Collaborative

Empowering community, enacting change. colorado village collaborative exists to bridge the gap between the streets and stable housing by creating and operating transformational shelter communities in partnership with people experiencing…

Housing & Shelter
8
Verde Valley Sanctuary

To provide emergency shelter and supportive services to victims of domestic and sexual violence.

Community Improvement
9
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

10
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
11
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
12
Safe of Columbia County

Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Realities for Children Charities and the most unlike its peers is Freedom Revived. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyInternational Christian Mis…Child Welfare & Trauma Serv…Supportive Housing ServicesFood Assistance and Basic N…Animal Rescue and Rehabilit…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%12%<5yr16%4%5–10yr21%32%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr12%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%3%<5yr16%1%5–10yr21%50%10–20yr15%13%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr12%5%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
1,505/10,997

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ATLANTIC CITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION — $12,500 · OtherATLANTIC CITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONCOMMUNITY CHOICE CREDIT UNION — $12,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHOICE CREDIT UNIONIndividual grant recipient — $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $9,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST VRAIN FOUNDATION — $7,500 · OtherST VRAIN FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF FOSTER FAMILIES INC — $7,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF FOSTER FAMILIES INCTABLE OF HOPE — $6,425 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+27 more — $41,325 · Other+27 moreVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $11,500 · Public BenefitAlmost Home Inc — $3,125 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC — $3,000 · Housing & ShelterFORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $500 · Housing & ShelterMOSAIC — $250 · Housing & ShelterGRACEFUL OAKS YOUTH RANCH — $4,000 · ReligionROCKY MOUNTAIN POLICE CHAPLAINS — $500 · ReligionSHIELD 616 INC — $2,400 · Crime & LegalCHILDSAFE COLORADO INC — $1,500 · Crime & LegalLONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $3,500 · AnimalsREALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES — $3,125 · Philanthropy
Other$138,550Public Benefit$11,500Housing & Shelter$6,875Religion$4,500Crime & Legal$3,900Animals$3,500Philanthropy$3,125

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGRACEFUL OAKS YOUTH RANCH — $4,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetLONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $3,125 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAlmost Home Inc — $3,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES — $3,125 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHIELD 616 INC — $2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORT COLLINS HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM REVIVED — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINDSOR GIVES — $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCARBON VALLEY HELP CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFirst Responder Trauma Services Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN POLICE CHAPLAINS — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOSAIC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT
  • Who funds CROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC
  • Who funds GRACEFUL OAKS YOUTH RANCH
  • Who funds LONGMONT HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds Almost Home Inc
  • Who funds REALITIES FOR CHILDREN CHARITIES
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR INC
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds ST VRAIN VALLEY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE CENTER
  • Who funds SHIELD 616 INC
  • Who funds CHILDSAFE COLORADO INC
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds COAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO33.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Weld Trust · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · United Way of Weld County Inc · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Northern Colorado United for Youth · Weld Community Foundation · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Centennial Lending a Hand Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Centennial Lending a Hand Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Centennial Lending a Hand Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph