Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cavan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$593kHousing & Shelter$561kHuman Services$466kReligion$146kCommunity Improvement$18kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES$36,000
ANGELWOOD$35,000
HEALING BRIDGE CLINIC$25,000
CLOTHES CLOSET$20,000
DOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCIL$20,000
SOUTHEAST GWINNET COUNTY CO-OP$18,000
BEACHES EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE MINISTRY$15,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF JACKSONVILLE$14,000
ARLINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES$6,000
NORTH GWINNETT CO-OP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $753k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIFE RENEWAL: $14k → 14%MUST MINISTRIES: $40k → 8%NORTH GWINNETT CO-OP: $5k → 9%LIFE RENEWAL: $13k → 14%MUST MINISTRIES: $20k → 8%LIFE RENEWAL: $11k → 14%LIFE RENEWAL: $8k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $43k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $40k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $40k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $36k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $35k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $35k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $35k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $28k → 14%ANGELWOOD: $23k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $50k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $40k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $36k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $36k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $36k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $35k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $35k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $28k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES: $18k → 14%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 14%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 14%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4k → 14%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 14 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$1.8M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+14%

Still filing today

79%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $459k · revenue +33%
  • AI
    ANGELWOOD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $315k · revenue +12%
  • PS
    PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $313k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • SG
    SOUTHEAST GWINNET COUNTY CO-OP
    one grant, 2025 · $18k
  • NG
    NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
2
Fresh Start Outreach Ministry Inc

It is the mission of Fresh Start Ministry to be the hands and feet of God by serving others in need in Monroe County. we have a mens and womans shelter and a program to help people get back on there feet

Human Services
3
Christian Service Center for Central Florida Inc

To create housing solutions, provide compassionate homeless day services, and work alongside partners to inspire community action.

Human Services
4
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services
5
Christian Community Ministries of Kershaw County

Christian Community Ministries is a financial crisis ministry helping those who fall within our definition of crisis. Except for one paid administrator, we are a totally volunteer organization. We operate as an extension of the servant…

Religion
6
Grace Resource Center Inc

To provide food, shelter, clothing, medical assistance and other immediate need to the thousands of needy and homeless people living in our area.

Housing & Shelter
7
Pastors Army

Provide resource and referrals

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Hope South Florida Inc

Providing hope for the homeless and hurting through housing, case management, support services and strategic alliances.

Human Services
9
Life Resource Services of Jackson County

Our mission is to help those who are struggling with homelessness, by providing resources to help rebuild their lives.

Human Services
10
Victory At Sarasota Inc

We are a church, food bank, outreach that ministers the love of Jesus to our city and the surrounding cities by preaching and teaching the word of God every Sunday. We also minister to anyone with a food need weekly through our food bank.…

Religion
11
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
12
Street Ministries 25 40

Street Ministries 25:40 is a ministry that sees people as Christ sees them, as we reach out to minister to their needs, while loving them unconditionally. We seek to meet the needs of the community in various ways including providing food,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Jacksonvilleinc; the most unlike its peers is Melanoma Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANGELWOOD INC: $315,000 · Human ServicesANGELWOOD INCPRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC: $313,250 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INCMust Ministries Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesMust Ministries IncLife Renewal Inc: $45,500 · Human ServicesLife Renewal Inc+2 more: $19,500 · Human ServicesMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $458,921 · OtherMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONCLOTHES CLOSET: $75,750 · OtherCLOTHES CLOSETDOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $68,500 · OtherDOWNTOWN ECUMENICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INCPASTORAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $24,500 · Other+2 more: $35,000 · OtherTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $147,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE CITY RESCUE…FAMILY PROMISE OF JACKSONVILLEINC: $100,500 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE …HEALING BRIDGE CLINIC INC: $134,000 · HealthBeaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc: $17,000 · Religion
Human Services$753,250Other$662,671Housing & Shelter$248,000Health$134,000Religion$17,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $458,921 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetANGELWOOD INC: $315,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC: $313,250 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetTHE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $147,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHEALING BRIDGE CLINIC INC: $134,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF JACKSONVILLEINC: $100,500 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetMust Ministries Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLife Renewal Inc: $45,500 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetPASTORAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $24,500 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetBeaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetArlington Community Services Inc: $14,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGELWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN SOCIAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING BRIDGE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF JACKSONVILLEINC ↗
  • Who funds Must Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Life Renewal Inc ↗
  • Who funds PASTORAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Beaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc ↗
  • Who funds Arlington Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH GWINNETT COOPERATIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust · The Thomas M and Irene Kirbo Charitable Foundation · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cavan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cavan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Presbyterian Social Ministries Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Jacksonvilleinc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cavan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph