Skip to content

· Public charity

Cascade Animal Protection Society

To save the lives of homeless, injured, and unwanted animals in washington state.to provide financial aid for the spaying and neutering of dogs and cats.to provide emergency care payments for animals who otherwise would not receive care due to thier owners inability to pay.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Animals$691k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$495k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURRFECT PALS$100,000
YAKIMA VALLEY PET RESCUE$10,000
HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE PARTNERS OF WA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PURRFECT PALS: $100k → 9%HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE PARTNERS OF WA: $10k → 9%FRIENDS AT YOUR METRO ANIMAL SHELTERS: $11k → 9%YAKIMA VALLEY PET RESCUE AND ADOPTION CENTER: $50k → 17%PURRFECT PALS: $100k → 9%HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE PARTNERS OF WA: $10k → 9%PUYALLUP ANIMAL RESCUE: $100k → 9%PURRFECT PALS: $100k → 9%HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE PARTNERS OF WA: $5k → 9%UNITED ANGELS: $10k → 9%PURRFECT PALS: $100k → 9%EATONVILLE KITTEN MISSION: $10k → 9%FERAL CARE: $75k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$485k · 3 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$485k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-21%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PURRFECT PALS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $400k · revenue +10%
  • YV
    Yakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center
    2× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +134%
  • HA
    Humane Animal Rescue Partners of Washington
    3× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • PA
    PUYALLUP ANIMAL RESCUE
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -35% · 74% of their budget
  • FC
    FERAL CARE
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -21% · 30% of their budget
  • FA
    FRIENDS AT YOUR METRO ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sos Lost Pet Rescue Nw Inc

Decrease over population of feral cats by trapping and doing spay or neuter. Provide veterinarian care to kittens. Take owner relinquishments of pets they can no longer care for. Taking in abandoned animals and providing veterinary care.…

Animals
2
Feisty Felines

Trap Neuter Return of cats in Thurston County, WA.

Animals
3
Okanogan Regional Humane

To significantly reduce the overpopulation of cats and dogs in the Okanogan Region by offering affordable/free spay & neuter programs, emergency vet care and partner with no kill rescues.

Animals
4
Purr-Fect Match Animal Rescue

Animal rescue

Animals
5
Kittitas County Friends of Animals

Rescue and adoption of animals, primarily dogs and cats, spay and neuter of rescues and microchip implants.

Animals
6
Arrf Animal Rescue

ARRF Animal Rescue is dedicated to the promotion of care and welfare of companion animals in Upper Kittitas County.

Animals
7
Purrfect Friends Cat Rescue

Cat Rescue

Animals
8
Imaginepeaceforpupsrescue

Rescue Dogs and Cats from high kill shelters owner surrenders and abandoned animals Provide vetting and microchipping Get them health certificates for transport to Oregon and Washington state and find them forever homes We arrange fosters…

Animals
9
Peggys Paws

Very small operation, we do T/N/R in the local area

Animals
10
Phelps County Animal Rescue

provide shelter and care for dogs and cats

Animals
11
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
12
Cats Cradle Rescue

Helped adopt over 200 felines and rehome over 50 other felines in the Portland Metro area.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Purrfect Pals; the most unlike its peers is Orting Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PURRFECT PALS: $400,000 · OtherPURRFECT PALS+2 more: $20,770 · OtherPUYALLUP ANIMAL RESCUE: $100,000 · AnimalsPUYALLUP ANIMAL RESCUEFERAL CARE: $75,000 · AnimalsFERAL CAREYakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center: $60,000 · AnimalsYakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption CenterHumane Animal Rescue Partners of Washington: $25,000 · AnimalsHumane Animal Rescue Partners of WashingtonEatonville Kitten Mission: $10,000 · Animals
Other$420,770Animals$270,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPURRFECT PALS: $400,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetPUYALLUP ANIMAL RESCUE: $100,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetFERAL CARE: $75,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetYakima Valley Pet Rescue and Adoption Center: $60,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetHumane Animal Rescue Partners of Washington: $25,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetEatonville Kitten Mission: $10,000 over 1y, 68% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cascade Animal Protection Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cascade Animal Protection Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cascade Animal Protection Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph