Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carr Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$222k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$715kHuman Services$233kHealth$138kCommunity Improvement$133kHousing & Shelter$130kFood & Nutrition$79kPhilanthropy$61kReligion$41kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION$50,500
BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$25,000
ST JOHN'S METHODIST CHURC$20,000
VALLEY MISSION$15,000
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY$15,000
NEW DIRECTION CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AUGUSTA HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CBR$10,000
HUNTERS FOR THE HUNGRY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$5,000
COVENANT SCHOOL$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WSA$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 37 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
13

Total granted

$1.3M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
0%

Still filing today

43%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHousing & ShelterEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VM
    VALLEY MISSION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +118%
  • TH
    TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +156% · 48% of their budget
  • ND
    NEW DIRECTIONS CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY GREATER AUGUSTA
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SD
    STUARTS DRAFT HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Outdoor Adventure Inc
Youth Development
2
The Virginia and Alfred Harrell Foundation
—
3
Eastern Shore Spca

Care and placement of unwanted animals on the eastern shore of virginia servicing accomack and northampton counties. providing temporary lodging and care to animals until placed while encouraging spaying and neutering.

Animals
4
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
5
Staunton-Augusta-Waynesboro Habitat for Humanity Inc

We build and restore homes, lives and communities through faith.

—
6
United Way of Virginia's Eastern Shore Inc

United way improves lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities around the world to advance common good. the united way of virginia's eastern shore is a local volunteer organization established in 1991 by business people and…

Philanthropy
7
Virginia Voice Inc

Virginia Voice is a non-profit audio reading and information service for individuals who are unable to read for themselves because of blindness, low vision, or other disabilities.

Human Services
8
Voices for Virginia's Children

The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.

Civil Rights
9
Virginia Center for Public Press

Vcpp operates wrir 97.3 lpfm, a community low power fm radio station serving citizens of the city of richmond, virginia, and surrounding counties. the station covers a listening area of approximately 5-7 miles. wrir broadcasts news, views…

Arts & Culture
10
Heart of Appalachia Tourism Authority

Promote, expand and develop tourism opportunities in the southwest virginia counties of buchanan, dickenson, lee, russell, scott, tazewell, wise and city of norton

—
11
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
12
Verona Community Food Pantry

Providing food to persons living in poverty

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Virginia Hunters Who Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shenandoah Valley Bicycle Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN'S METHODIST CHURC: $190,200 · OtherST JOHN'S METHODIST CHURCBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $158,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGEJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $67,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAUGUSTA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $64,600 · OtherAUGUSTA HEALTH FOUNDATIONTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $45,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF STAUNTON AUGUSTA COUNTY & WAYNESBORO INC: $42,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $39,000 · Other+36 more: $322,350 · Other+36 moreVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $321,218 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATI…THE STUART HALL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationVALLEY MISSION INC: $85,000 · Housing & ShelterVIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC: $40,000 · AnimalsAUGUSTA REGIONAL SPCA INC: $12,000 · AnimalsNEW DIRECTIONS CENTER INC: $45,000 · HealthADIPSY: $2,000 · HealthShenandoah Valley Bicycle Coalition: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsWAYNESBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 · Human Services
Other$1,109,350Education$336,218Housing & Shelter$85,000Animals$52,000Health$47,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$9,500Human Services$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $321,218 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY MISSION INC: $85,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $45,000 over 8y, 48% of budgetNEW DIRECTIONS CENTER INC: $45,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF STAUNTON AUGUSTA COUNTY & WAYNESBORO INC: $42,500 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetVIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $39,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TALKING BOOK CENTER INC: $26,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE STUART HALL SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHISTORIC STAUNTON FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetANNAS HOUSE: $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetAUGUSTA REGIONAL SPCA INC: $12,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCROZET VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $11,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetShenandoah Valley Bicycle Coalition: $10,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetWAYNESBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $9,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $6,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE COVENANT SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADIPSY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF STAUNTON-AUGUSTA CO: $500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF STAUNTON AUGUSTA COUNTY & WAYNESBORO INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HUNTERS WHO CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TALKING BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUART HALL SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC STAUNTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNAS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTA REGIONAL SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds CROZET VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds Shenandoah Valley Bicycle Coalition ↗
  • Who funds WAYNESBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE COVENANT SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Central Blue RidgeVA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Central Blue Ridge · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Carr Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Carr Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph