· Public charity
Caroline's Nonprofit Thrift Shop
Organization's mission is to provide revenues to other non-profits that support children's special needs predominantly in the local community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $552,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $575,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $23,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $545k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MONARCH SERVICES | $35,000 |
| COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE | $30,000 |
| JACOB'S HEARTMONTEREY BAY PEN FOUN | $30,000 |
| HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY | $30,000 |
| PAJARO VALLEY SHELTER SERVICES | $25,000 |
| CASA | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY BRIDGES | $25,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| SPECIAL PARENTS INFORMATION | $20,000 |
| NOURISHING GENERATIONS | $20,000 |
| FAMILY CIRCLE CENTER | $20,000 |
| TEEN KITCHEN PROJECT | $20,000 |
| DIENTES | $20,000 |
| FOOD WHAT | $20,000 |
| NAMI | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $617k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY8× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue +25%
- CKCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE8× · 2017–2025 · $220k · revenue ×13
- PFPartnership for Children7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +202%
Funded once
- TCTHE CHILDREN ARE OUR FUTUREone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -1%
- AYAIM Youth Mental Healthone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +7%
- PVPAJARO VALLEY PREVENTION AND STUDENT ASSISTANCE INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve our community by providing direct access to sustainable sources of fresh produce and other unique foods, and provide education about food issues, both local and beyond.
The Child Care Coordinating Council of San Mateo County, Inc. (4Cs) connects and empowers families, educators, and child care providers with resources today for a stronger San Mateo County tomorrow.
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
The mission of CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) of San Benito County is to train and support community volunteers who advocate for abused and neglected children placed in foster care, upholding the children's rights while pursuing…
Resources and Community Advocacy. Serving low income youth and families in the community. Providing culturally competent and sensitivie programing based on based on the needs and resources available in Santa Clara County.
CASA recruits, trains, and supports community volunteers who advocate for chidren and youth throughout their journey in foster care.
California parenting institute (cpi dba child parent institute) is a family resource center, serving families throughout sonoma county since 1978. our mission is to end child abuse and strengthen the health of children, parents, and…
Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.
Develop resources, raise awareness, and provide support for children with disabilities and their families.
Our mission is to support parents and care providers by providing information, education, and advocacy for Mother-Friendly childbirth.
Kids in Common advocates for education, healthcare, social-emotional well being, and justice for all children in Santa Clara County by supporting policies, promoting data-driven action, and fostering collaborations of cross-systems leaders…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pajaro Valley Prevention and Student Assistance Inc and the most unlike its peers is The 418 Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds Partnership for Children ↗
- Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Santa Cruz County ↗
- Who funds MONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Special Parents Information Network of Santa Cruz County ↗
- Who funds Community Bridges ↗
- Who funds TEEN KITCHEN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds WALNUT AVENUE FAMILY & WOMENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NAMI SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS AGENCY OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Nourishing Generations Educational Project ↗
- Who funds FOR KIDS FOUNDATION MONTEREY BAY ↗
- Who funds DIENTES COMMUNITY DENTAL CARE ↗
- Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
- Who funds The Santa Cruz Lesbian and Gay Community Center ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPES CLOSET OF SANTA CRUZ ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF THE CENTRAL COAST ↗
- Who funds LIVE LIKE COCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHARED ADVENTURES ↗
- Who funds SALUD Y CARINO INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FoodWhat Incorporated ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN ARE OUR FUTURE ↗
- Who funds SIENA HOUSE MATERNITY HOME OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Center for Youth Mental Health ↗
- Who funds AIM Youth Mental Health ↗
- Who funds SKILLS OF LIFE CAFE ↗
- Who funds PAJARO VALLEY PREVENTION AND STUDENT ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Pajaro Valley Loaves and Fishes Inc ↗
- Who funds THE 418 PROJECT ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Volunteer Centers of Santa Cruz County · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Pajaro Valley Community Health Trust · East Bay Community Foundation · Newman's Own Foundation · Sutter Bay Medical Foundation · Dignity Health · The Nicholson Family Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Rotary Club of SC Sunrise Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Caroline's Nonprofit Thrift Shop funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Caroline's Nonprofit Thrift Shop?
Find your warmest path to Caroline's Nonprofit Thrift Shop through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.