· Public charity
Carolina Thread Trail
To provide capital, technical expertise, and support to local communities to successfully build the regional vision of the trail and conserve natural lanes along the trails.
Read this first · the figures below need context
89% of Carolina Thread Trail’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Foundation For The Carolinas, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 17 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Carolina Thread Trail named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $433k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $235k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $190k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY OF GASTONIA | $140,000 |
| CATAWBA LAND CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| TOWN OF MCADENVILLE | $46,666 |
| CLEVELAND COUNTY WATER | $45,000 |
| SOUTHERN OFF-ROAD BICYCLE ASSOCIATION - TARHEEL TRAILBLAZERS | $38,000 |
| LINDSAY PETTUS GREENWAY INC | $30,000 |
| YORK COUNTY | $25,000 |
| CITY OF BELMONT | $25,000 |
| VILLAGE OF MISENHEIMER | $25,000 |
| TOWN OF MARSHVILLE | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $714k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CLCatawba Lands Conservancy3× · 2020–2022 · $284k · revenue -26%
- TOTOWN OF CRAMERTON2× · 2019–2022 · $268k
- COCITY OF CONCORD FBO OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT2× · 2019–2022 · $150k
Funded once
- COCITY OF SALISBURYone grant, 2019 · $227k
- TOTOWN OF CORNELIUSone grant, 2019 · $100k
- COCity of Mount Hollyone grant, 2019 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Catawba Lands Conservancy · Foundation for the Carolinas · Gaston Memorial Hospital Inc · Gaston Community Foundation · The Golden Leaf Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carolina Thread Trail funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.