Skip to content

· Public charity

Carole Robertson Center for Learning

The Carole Robertson Center For Learning educates, enriches, and empowers children and families through comprehensive child and family development programs.

$6.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$16MEducation$2.5MYouth Development$711kInternational$454kArts & Culture$234k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $6,464,210, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,911,478 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $447,268 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $154k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $5.1M
$85,287
Median grant
2
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Metropolitan Family Services$4,161,630
Erie Neighborhood House$635,841
House Of Kidds Childcare$315,796
Weathersby Wonder World Inc$233,707
Positive Attitudes Working Inc$184,315
Serving All Families Everywhere 2$151,165
Scribbles Daycare$102,433
Creative Development Child Care Inc$85,788
Sunrise Day Care Inc$85,287
Arco Iris Home Daycare LLC$82,099
Little Explorers Daycare$75,556
Little Space Daycare Corporation$74,298
TJ's Heavenly Angels Academy$62,840
Lorissa Learning Lab LLC$59,786
Child's World Academic Inc$42,660
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $15.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Erie Neighborhood House: $791k → 14%Erie Neighborhood House: $636k → 14%Erie Neighborhood House: $512k → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $5.0M → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $4.2M → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $3.9M → 14%Channing's Day Care Center: $125k → 14%Channing's Day Care Center: $78k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 21 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -4% since the first grant, against -94% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
1

Total granted

$20M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
-94%

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $272k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    Metropolitan Family Services
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13M · revenue +51%
  • EN
    ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +56%
  • CC
    CHANNINGS CHILDCARE ACADEMY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $203k · revenue +34% · 48% of their budget

Funded once

  • AP
    ALBANY PARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $35k · revenue -94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.

Human Services
2
Park Slope Child Care Collective Inc

To provide day care to a diverse community in a loving, caring and supportive educational environment focused on the socio-emotional development of children ages 2 - 5.

—
3
Rochester Child Care Center Inc

The center strives to provide a range of services that support working parents while fostering the emotional, social, physical and intellectual growth of their children. special consideration is given to low income families and families…

Human Services
4
Atlantic City Day Nursery

Childcare

Human Services
5
Child Care Choicesinc

Public service for daycare

—
6
Community United Child Care Centers Inc

Our mission is to provide quality child care in a warm and nurturing atmosphere. we offer developmentally appropriate activities in small and large group settings designed to enhance the social, emotional, intellectual, language, and…

Human Services
7
Green Byrne Child Care Center

The green byrne child care center services approximately 85 children ranging from 6 weeks to 6 years of age. teaching strategies for infants, toddlers and preschoolers align with the pennsylvania early learning standards and focus on…

—
8
Creative Beginnings Child Development Center Inc

Creative beginnings child development center is dedicated to providing high quality early childhood care and education by creating a safe, nurturing environment in which children develop a positive self image, a love of learning,…

Human Services
9
Creative Kids Coop

A non-profit dedicated to providing a safe and clean daycare for children from infant aged to elementary aged level

Human Services
10
Young Child Associates

Young Child Assiciates mission is to keep children safe and to support families in the daily care and guidance of their children. Our programs are designed to promote social, academic and personal growth using large and small group…

Human Services
11
The Childrens Center

The children's center provides early child care and education in a vibrant learning community that emphasizes personal development, social relationships and family involvement, in order to establish a foundation for lifelong learning.

Education
12
Coordinated Child Development Program Inc

To provide accessible, affordable care in a secure, nurturing and creative environment for children six weeks to eleven years old.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Creative Child Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Channings Childcare Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Metropolitan Family Services: $13,075,963 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1,938,962 · Human ServicesERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE+1 more: $203,305 · Human ServicesHouse Of Kidds Childcare: $1,034,850 · OtherHouse Of Kidds Chi…Scribbles Daycare: $293,895 · OtherScribbles DaycareSUNRISE CHILD CARE INC: $248,566 · OtherSUNRISE CHILD CARE…Weathersby Wonder World Inc: $233,707 · OtherWeathersby Wonder …Little Explorers Daycare: $206,143 · OtherLittle Explorers D…TJ's Heavenly Angels Academy: $200,652 · OtherTJ's Heavenly Ange…Lorissa Learning Lab LLC: $192,494 · OtherLorissa Learning L…Little Space Daycare Corporation: $189,933 · OtherLittle Space Dayca…Child's World Academic Inc: $151,593 · Other4 Crosses Academy Of Learning LTD: $142,603 · OtherArco Iris Home Daycare LLC: $111,459 · Other+5 more: $267,174 · Other+5 morePOSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER INC: $556,124 · Youth DevelopmentCREATIVE CHILD CARE INC: $243,029 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER ROCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $154,675 · Youth DevelopmentCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $453,666 · InternationalJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $110,300 · Education
Human Services$15,218,230Other$3,273,069Youth Development$953,828International$453,666Education$110,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $13,075,963 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1,938,962 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetPOSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER INC: $556,124 over 4y, 38% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $453,666 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE CHILD CARE INC: $248,566 over 4y, 23% of budgetCREATIVE CHILD CARE INC: $243,029 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHANNINGS CHILDCARE ACADEMY: $203,305 over 3y, 48% of budgetGREATER ROCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $154,675 over 3y, 13% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $110,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALBANY PARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE ATTITUDE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE CHILD CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE CHILD CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANNINGS CHILDCARE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ROCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBANY PARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carole Robertson Center for Learning funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carole Robertson Center for Learning. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carole Robertson Center for Learning?

    Find your warmest path to Carole Robertson Center for Learning through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carole Robertson Center for Learning’s filings →

    More from the funding graph