Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carol J Macguire Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$50kArts & Culture$38kYouth Development$33kEducation$29kReligion$3kPhilanthropy$3kCrime & Legal$1kRecreation & Sports$250
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$310k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER$10,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO$10,000
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER EL PASO$9,000
AMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM$5,000
PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%AMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM: $5k → 14%EL PASO PRO MUSICA: $2k → 21%AMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM: $5k → 14%CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC: $1k → 21%EL PASO PRO MUSICA: $2k → 21%EL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC: $250 → 21%EL PASO PRO MUSICA: $1k → 21%JUNTOS ART ASSOCIATION: $500 → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $10k → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $8k → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $8k → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $5k → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $5k → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $4k → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $3k → 21%EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 21%BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $2k → 21%PARADOX TRAVELING ART CO EL PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4k → 21%PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%PASO DEL NORTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 21%EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $1k → 21%CREATIVE KIDS: $500 → 21%EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $500 → 21%LA MECHA CONTEMPORARY: $3k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$140k · 7 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$140k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-27%

Still filing today

71%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +307%
  • EP
    EL PASO PRO-MUSICA
    4× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +9%
  • EP
    EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • PT
    PARADOX TRAVELING ART CO EL PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • PD
    PASO DEL NORTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Paso Symphony Foundation

El paso symphony foundation is a separate corporation which provides the el paso symphony orchestra association with charitable and educational support.

—
2
El Paso Matters Inc

Engage in the highest quality independent production, publication and or distribution of orginial news and or news-based materials of community value to far west texas, southern new mexico and northern chihuahua, mexico.

Public Benefit
3
El Paso Chamber of Commerce Foundation

The el paso chamber exists to operate exclusively for charitable, educational, scientific, and literary purposes relating to the city of el paso. the chamber foundation serves as its supporting organization to pursue grants to fund…

—
4
El Paso Community Foundation

To establish charitable funds. To provide a vehicle for donors' varied interests. To promote local philanthropy. To provide leadership and resources in addressing local challenges and opportunities.

Philanthropy
5
El Paso Human Services Inc

El paso human services, inc. (ephsi), a private non-profit multi-purpose organization, has been providing social services in el paso county since 1984. ephsi has extensive experience in developing, implementing and executing federal, state…

Human Services
6
Santa Fe Concert Foundation Dba Performance Santa Fe Foundation

To support Santa Fe Concert Association, DBA: Performance Santa Fe

Arts & Culture
7
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
8
El Paso Community Action Program Project Bravo Inc

Our mission:project bravo builds bridges to opportunities that help individuals and families thrive in our community.

Community Improvement
9
Pueblo Symphony Association Inc

To bring musical artists together to perform concerts for the citizens of the city and county of pueblo.

Arts & Culture
10
El Paso Museum of Art Foundation

To create a permanent endowment fund to support the el paso museum of art. a portion of the capital appreciation and earnings are distributed annually to the el paso museum of art and used for acquisitions, conservation and preservation,…

Arts & Culture
11
Borderplex Bi-National Economic Alliance

To recruit new industry and facilitate the retention and expansion of new jobs and capital investment in the greater el paso, las cruces and juarez region.

Community Improvement
12
Paso Del Norte Health Information Exchange

Paso del Norte Health Information Exchange exists to promote the health of El Paso County and surrounding communities by facilitating the creation and operation of a health information exchange. The central activity of the organization is…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Paso Pro-Musica; the most unlike its peers is Borderland Rainbow Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO: $47,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASOEL PASO PRO-MUSICA: $6,750 · OtherEL PASO PRO-MUSICAYOUTH LIFE SKILLS FOR GREATER EL PASO INC: $4,500 · OtherYOUTH LIFE SKILLS FOR GREATER EL PASO INCPARADOX TRAVELING ART CO EL PASO DEL NORTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherPASO DEL NORTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Other+3 more: $2,500 · OtherBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $42,500 · Civil RightsBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTERYOUTH LIFE SKILLS FORE GREATER EL PASO INC: $27,500 · Recreation & SportsYOUTH LIFE SKILLS FO…+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $1,500 · Arts & CulturePaso del Norte Community Foundation: $2,500 · HealthEL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationCREATIVE KIDS INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$69,550Civil Rights$42,500Recreation & Sports$27,750Arts & Culture$11,500Health$2,500Education$2,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER: $42,500 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetYOUTH LIFE SKILLS FORE GREATER EL PASO INC: $27,500 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetAMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEL PASO PRO-MUSICA: $6,750 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE KIDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BORDERLAND RAINBOW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH LIFE SKILLS FORE GREATER EL PASO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO PRO-MUSICA ↗
  • Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOC INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PASO BORDER YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Paso Community FoundationTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Paso Community Foundation · Robert E & Evelyn McKee Foundation · The Hunt Family Foundation · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Cesle C & Mamie F Dues Foundation Xxxxx4003 · Sue Smith Harrison Family Foundation · The Electric Company Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carol J Macguire Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carol J Macguire Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carol J Macguire Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Carol J Macguire Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carol J Macguire’s filings →

    More from the funding graph