· Private foundation
Carol Clarkson Eklund Foundation Pioneer Bank & Trust Trustee
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of CAROL CLARKSON EKLUND FOUNDATION PIONEER BANK & TRUST TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANDRE HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY | $35,000 |
| YUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $32,000 |
| ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE | $32,000 |
| GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC | $23,500 |
| WE SEE YOU | $20,000 |
| ST JOSEPH'S CHILDREN'S SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| MONTESSORI GLOBAL GROWTH FUND | $20,000 |
| THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF S DAKOTA | $20,000 |
| YUMA CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,250 |
| LEGACY FOUNDATION CHRIS-TOWN YMCA | $11,250 |
| ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SMST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $172k · revenue +58%
- CFChild & Family Services of Yuma Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +92%
- MGMONTESSORI GLOBAL GROWTH FUND3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- YPYUMA PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2022 · $11k
- SSSHIRLEY SPEAKS INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -48% · 32% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To end family homelessness by restoring hope and rebuilding lives, so no child will ever have to sleep on the streets.
To halt hunger and malnutrition in Yavapai County and provide relief from suffering for those who are living in poverty by giving a hand up, not just a hand out.
Provide emergency food boxes for needy families and individuals who reside in rural yavapai county arizona
Since 1957, SRM has provided safe emergency shelter, meals, and clothing to anyone in need. All participants are experiencing homelessness and living below the federal poverty line at intake. Located in Flagstaff, we have three facilities.…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body. we are a powerful association of men, women and children,…
The Center's primary mission is to make foster children in Yuma County more comfortable, cared for, and feeling loved. We accomplish this by providing clothing items, comfort items including stuffed animals, teddy bears, handmade quilts…
Organization provides pet food and supplies to needy families.
The organization's mission is to feed the hungry in the community through education, advocacy and the acquisition, storage and distribution of food.
The mission of the organization is to operate as an active community food bank for the distribution of food and food programs thourghout the sedona area. the food bank is supported through contributions from individuals and other…
Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yuma Community Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Montessori Global Growth Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds YUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Child & Family Services of Yuma Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MONTESSORI GLOBAL GROWTH FUND ↗
- Who funds Childrens Museum of Yuma County Inc ↗
- Who funds RAPID CITY CLUB FOR BOYS INC ↗
- Who funds WE SEE YOU INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds SHIRLEY SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF YUMA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carol Clarkson Eklund Foundation Pioneer Bank & Trust Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Carol Clarkson Eklund Foundation Pioneer Bank & Trust Trustee?
Find your warmest path to Carol Clarkson Eklund Foundation Pioneer Bank & Trust Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.