Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carlton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$43kHealth$40kArts & Culture$19kEnvironment$16kCommunity Improvement$16kAnimals$14kYouth Development$10kReligion$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$493k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEERFIELDWINDSOR SCHOOL$4,000
ARTESIAN ALLIANCE$4,000
ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
ALBANY HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
ALBANY MUSEUM OF ART$2,000
KNOX MARTIN FOUNDATION$1,500
YMCA$1,000
LIBERTY HOUSE$1,000
OPERATION SMILE$1,000
YOUNG LIFE OF ALBANY$1,000
CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC$1,000
PHOEBE FOUNDATION$1,000
KEEP ALBANYDOUGHERTY BEAUTIFUL$1,000
ALBANY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$1,000
ALBANY TECHNICAL COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%LIBERTY HOUSE: $1k → 14%LIBERTY HOUSE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$182k · 24 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$182k
$6k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthAnimalsInternationalEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ALBANY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +89%
  • PF
    PHOEBE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +132%
  • FR
    FLINT RIVERQUARIUM INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $9k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FOUND
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • GI
    GIRLS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
2
Albright Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Elizabethtown Healthcare Foundation
Health
4
Albion Historical Society

To encourage preservation, education , research, and interest in the history of Albion

Arts & Culture
5
Fulton County Historical Society

Historical museums and genelogical records

Arts & Culture
6
Albany Housing Iii Inc

The organization rents group homes to individuals with disabilities.

Human Services
7
Albany Housing Incorporated

The organization rents group homes to individuals with disabilities.

Human Services
8
Friends of the Alabama Governors Mansion Inc

To Preserve the Governors Mansion

Arts & Culture
9
Historic Albany Foundation Inc

The primary purpose of the foundation is to advocate and support the preservation and restoration of historic building in the albany, new york area.

Arts & Culture
10
Adams Gladwell Durham Foundation

The mission of the organization is to improve knowledge, patient care and techniques in the oral and maxillofacial surgery sphere. few charitable organizations exist within the intersecting medical and dental realm of oral and…

—
11
Alliance Healthcare Foundation
—
12
Mount Auburn Hospital

The mission of new england baptist hospital (nebh or hospital) is the operation and maintenance of an acute care, orthopedic specialty hospital and provision of all services related thereto for the benefit of patients. nebh strives to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albany Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Darton Health Professions Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEERFIELDWINDSOR SCHOOL: $28,000 · OtherDEERFIELDWINDSOR SCHOOLARTESIAN ALLIANCE: $16,000 · OtherARTESIAN ALLIANCEST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCHYOUNG LIFE OF ALBANY: $8,500 · OtherYOUNG LIFE OF ALBANYALBANY TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $7,000 · OtherALBANY TECHNICAL COLLEGECHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FDN: $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FDNCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $5,000 · OtherSEWANEE - THE UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $5,000 · OtherCHILDRENS'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA AT: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherYMCA: $4,000 · Other+7 more: $11,500 · Other+7 moreTHE ALBANY MUSEUM OF ART INCORPORA: $14,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ALBANY MUSEU…FLINT RIVERQUARIUM INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureFLINT RIVERQUARI…ALBANY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureALBANY SYMPHONY …PHOEBE FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 · HealthPHOEBE FOU…GRACEWAY RECOVERY RESIDENCE INC: $3,500 · HealthGRACEWAY R…ALBANY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,000 · AnimalsOPERATION SMILE INC: $7,000 · InternationalKEEP ALBANY DOUGHERTY BEAUTIFUL: $7,000 · EnvironmentDARTON HEALTH PROFESSIONS FOUNDATIO: $3,000 · EducationLIBERTY HOUSE: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$110,000Arts & Culture$28,000Health$17,000Animals$14,000International$7,000Environment$7,000Education$3,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ALBANY MUSEUM OF ART INCORPORA: $14,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetALBANY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPHOEBE FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFLINT RIVERQUARIUM INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP ALBANY DOUGHERTY BEAUTIFUL: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetALBANY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGRACEWAY RECOVERY RESIDENCE INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDARTON HEALTH PROFESSIONS FOUNDATIO: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLIBERTY HOUSE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ALBANY MUSEUM OF ART INCORPORA ↗
  • Who funds ALBANY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOEBE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLINT RIVERQUARIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEEP ALBANY DOUGHERTY BEAUTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds ALBANY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACEWAY RECOVERY RESIDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DARTON HEALTH PROFESSIONS FOUNDATIO ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W B Haley Foundation 4655000132GA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W B Haley Foundation 4655000132 · The McCormack Foundation · Hillard Family Charitable Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carlton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carlton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Liberty House: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Carlton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Carlton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Carlton’s filings →

More from the funding graph