Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carl Wilson Gregory Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$91kHuman Services$90kYouth Development$85kEducation$49kHealth$37kEnvironment$3kPhilanthropy$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUCKENTHALER CULTURAL CENTER$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF FULLERTON$8,250
CRITTENTON SERVICES$6,000
PROVIDENCE ST JUDE MEMORIAL FOUNDAT$5,000
WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES$5,000
The Cabin$2,000
PEO FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $10k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $6k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $7k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%WESTERN YOUTH SERVICES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$351k · 11 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$351k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

36%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +37%
  • WY
    Western Youth Services
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +106%
  • PF
    PEO Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JUDE HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +51%
  • SP
    St Patrick's Church Jordan NY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IN
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Fullerton College

To promote fullerton college and enhance the lives of its students by raising and accepting resources for scholarships, grants, programmatic, and institutional support.

Education
2
Fullerton Schools Foundation

The foundation is structured to receive contributions to support school projects in the areas of technology, fine arts, athletics, library/media, vocational education, and scholarships.

3
Fullerton School District Educational Foundation

Fullerton education foundation mission is to support the advancement of technology in education within the fullerton school district. activities to support this mission include (1)fundraising activities to gererate funds for laptops for…

Education
4
Friends of the Library of Fullerton

Support fullerton public library

5
Fullerton Friends of Music

Providing free chamber music concerts to the community.

6
Fullerton Community Nursery School

Fcns is a cooperative parent participation pre-school that provides a place for children to develop their social, emotional, physical, and academic skills while creating a lifelong love of learning.

Education
7
Boys and Girls Club of Fullerton Endowment Fund

To support the boys and girls club of fullerton

Unclassified
8
Fullerton Elementary Teachers Association

To promote and improve the welfare and working conditions of its members. To collect and pay dues to North Orange County United Teachers.

9
The Fulton School

The fulton school is a college preparatory school for pre-kindergarten through 12th grade. the fulton schools mission is to provide a well-balanced educational foudation for success in college and in life for its students.

10
Fullerton Public Library Foundation

The mission of the Fullerton Public Library Foundation is to enrich the quality of the life of the people of Fullerton by raising funds for the enhancement of the library. These funds shall be in supplement to, but not in place of, those…

Education
11
The Fuller Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
12
Pleasanton Isd Education Foundation

Educational Excellence

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fullerton College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is St Jude Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUCKENTHALER CULTURAL CENTER — $74,940 · OtherMUCKENTHALER CULTURAL CENTERCRITTENTON SERVICES — $50,000 · OtherCRITTENTON SERVICESFULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,500 · OtherFULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATIONPROVIDENCE ST JUDE MEMORIAL FOUNDAT — $22,600 · OtherPROVIDENCE ST JUDE MEMORIAL FOUNDATThe Cabin — $15,000 · OtherThe Cabin+7 more — $10,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC — $80,050 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULL…Western Youth Services — $53,500 · Human ServicesWestern Youth Se…JOYA SCHOLARS — $17,000 · EducationPEO Foundation — $5,000 · EducationTHE ELECTRIC COMPANY THEATRE — $1,000 · EducationFriends of the Fullerton Arboretum — $3,000 · EnvironmentST JUDE HOSPITAL — $1,000 · Health
Other$198,040Youth Development$80,050Human Services$53,500Education$23,000Environment$3,000Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC — $80,050 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetWestern Youth Services — $53,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetJOYA SCHOLARS — $17,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetPEO Foundation — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Fullerton Arboretum — $3,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetST JUDE HOSPITAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELECTRIC COMPANY THEATRE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLEON OWENS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FULLERTON INC
  • Who funds Western Youth Services
  • Who funds FULLERTON COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JOYA SCHOLARS
  • Who funds PEO Foundation
  • Who funds Friends of the Fullerton Arboretum
  • Who funds ST JUDE HOSPITAL
  • Who funds THE ELECTRIC COMPANY THEATRE
  • Who funds LEON OWENS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carl Wilson Gregory Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph