Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl Marshall Reeves and Mildred Almen Reeves Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$617k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.9MHealth$1.8MHuman Services$499kScience & Tech$206kArts & Culture$202kFood & Nutrition$181kYouth Development$151kRecreation & Sports$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $373k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $189k
$19,995
Median grant
8
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UMASS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION (U MASS MEDICAL SCHOOL)$85,000
FAMILY SERVICE INC$53,790
VUMC (VANDERBILT EYE INSTITUTE)$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN$45,384
RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST$45,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$40,374
IUPUC$33,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$29,742
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$26,219
GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA$25,000
BRIDGE TO DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE INC$25,000
OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA$22,844
ECUMENICAL ASSEMBLY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY CHURCHES INC DBD LOVE CHAPEL$20,000
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$20,000
DOHENY EYE INSTITUTE (UCLA)$19,995
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $163k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REINS TO RECOVERY INC: $5k → 11%REINS TO RECOVERY INC: $1k → 11%OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $32k → 13%OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $28k → 13%OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $23k → 13%ALLIANCE FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRESS: $22k → 13%JUST FRIENDS INC: $13k → 13%OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $12k → 13%OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $8k → 13%JUST FRIENDS INC: $8k → 13%JUST FRIENDS INC: $6k → 13%JUST FRIENDS INC: $3k → 13%JUST FRIENDS INC: $2k → 13%OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
MO
MD
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 38 repeat orgs$553k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
15

Total granted

$4.6M
$459k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-13%

Still filing today

53%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $94k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $762k · revenue +16%
  • BC
    BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $457k · revenue +28%
  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $255k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • JA
    JOHN A MORAN EYE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $90k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO ROSS EYE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $80k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH
    one grant, 2022 · $73k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Center for Human Services Inc

Inspiring life journeys

Human Services
2
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
7
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
9
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
11
Community Shelter Board

The community shelter board is ending homelessness by creating collaborations, innovating solutions, and investing in quality programs.

—
12
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Bartholomew County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bartholomew County Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
22/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UMASS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION (U MASS MEDICAL SCHOOL): $443,951 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION (U MASS MEDICAL SCHOOL)IUPUC: $334,275 · OtherIUPUCVANDERBILT EYE INSTITUTE: $204,046 · OtherVANDERBILT EYE INSTITUTEVUMC (VANDERBILT EYE INSTITUTE): $187,100 · OtherVUMC (VANDERBILT EYE INSTITUTE)UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $167,724 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $160,850 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INCCOLUMBUS INDIANA PHILHARMONIC: $105,166 · OtherCOLUMBUS PARK FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $91,500 · OtherJOHN A MORAN EYE CENTER: $90,000 · Other+27 more: $776,080 · Other+27 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $761,817 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYBARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $457,205 · EducationBARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL FOU…IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $255,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $99,781 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH+2 more: $31,100 · EducationFamily Service of Bartholomew County Inc: $206,020 · Human ServicesOUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $103,496 · Human ServicesJUST FRIENDS INC: $31,664 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRESS INC: $21,591 · Human Services+1 more: $6,134 · Human ServicesCOLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $89,547 · HealthRETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST: $45,000 · HealthCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC: $25,700 · HealthBRIDGE TO DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE INC: $25,000 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR YOUTH INC: $135,876 · Youth DevelopmentBARTHOLOMEW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $53,793 · Arts & CultureKIDSCOMMONS COLUMBUS COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $31,514 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $8,955 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD FAMILY CENTER: $79,929 · Community Improvement
Other$2,660,692Education$1,604,903Human Services$368,905Health$185,247Youth Development$135,876Arts & Culture$94,262Community Improvement$79,929

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $761,817 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $457,205 over 5y, 24% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $255,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Service of Bartholomew County Inc: $206,020 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $160,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR YOUTH INC: $135,876 over 6y, 11% of budgetOUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $103,496 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $99,781 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $91,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $89,547 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetLINCOLN CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD FAMILY CENTER: $79,929 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetBARTHOLOMEW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $53,793 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetJUST FRIENDS INC: $31,664 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetKIDSCOMMONS COLUMBUS COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $31,514 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC: $25,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE TO DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRESS INC: $21,591 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetDANCERS STUDIO INC OF COLUMBUS: $20,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetSANS SOUCI INC: $18,818 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS AREA CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetCOLUMBUS AREA ARTS COUNCIL INC: $8,955 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC: $8,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBartholomew County Humane Society Inc: $7,120 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetREINS TO RECOVERY INC: $6,134 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetIMAGINATION LIBRARY OF BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY INC: $3,600 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMILL RACE CENTER INC: $3,596 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Service of Bartholomew County Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOSPICE OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds JUST FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDSCOMMONS COLUMBUS COMMUNITY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO DOVE RECOVERY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRESS INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCERS STUDIO INC OF COLUMBUS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clarence E Custer and Inez R CusterIN41.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clarence E Custer and Inez R Custer · Heritage Fund - the Community Foundation of Bartholomew County Inc · Elizabeth Ruddick Nugent Foundation · United Way of Bartholomew County Inc · Hazel M Teegarden Foundation Inc · Repp Associates Foundation · Columbus Regional Hospital Foundation Inc · Robert & Helen Haddad Foundation · Centra Foundation Inc · First Financial Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Presbyterian Foundation of Columbus Indiana

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl Marshall Reeves and Mildred Almen Reeves Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl Marshall Reeves and Mildred Almen Reeves Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl Marshall Reeves and Mildred Almen Reeves’ filings →

    More from the funding graph