Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$96kRecreation & Sports$57kCommunity Improvement$42kHousing & Shelter$33kPublic Benefit$27kHuman Services$23kArts & Culture$8kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$460k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$19,630
HOPE HAVEN$5,000
GRAND RIVER ENTERTAINMENT$5,000
CHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS$5,000
CAMP RAINBOW$3,000
OPERATION HELP$2,000
Individual grant recipient$500
GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $550) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHOES FROM THE HEART: $300 → 14%SHOES FROM THE HEART: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 13 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$280k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
0%

Still filing today

46%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationAnimalsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $74k
  • CA
    CHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue -57% · 29% of their budget
  • CR
    CAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • NM
    NORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +38%
  • CC
    CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • KP
    KELLY POLING ARTS DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Charles Historical Society

Collection and preservation of historical documents pertaining to saint charles county, missouri and making them available to the general public

—
2
Livingston County Wildlife and Conservation Club

To further the cause of conservation of natural resources and to provide recreation and entertainment for members

—
3
Gratiot County Historical and Genealogical Society

Museum/genealogical activity

—
4
Greenlawn Centerport Historical Association

The preservation and study of local history

Housing & Shelter
5
Eureka Springs Historical Museum

Maintaines the historical museum for the town of eureka springs, educates patrons, preserves and procures historical objects that relate to the history of the region.

—
6
Huntington County Historical Society

To collect, preserve, interpret and promote interest in the history of huntington county, indiana. the society presents its collection to the public through exhibitions, educational programs and publications.

Arts & Culture
7
Rock County Historical Society

To preserve the history of rock county, minnesota

—
8
Grundy County Historical Society

To provide for the people of grundy county, illinois a museum building, collection, and preservation of historical data, records, and artifacts of its people.

—
9
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

—
10
Mason County Sports Hall of Fame Inc

Recognize past & present sports achievements of the county.

Arts & Culture
11
Hamilton County Historical Society

To educate the public about the history of hamilton county, indiana and to preserve historic structures in hamlton county, indiana

—
12
Kingfisher Kayaking Inc
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand River Area Family Ymca Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grand River Historial Society Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $74,212 · OtherUNITED METHODIST CHURCHHOPE HAVEN: $25,000 · OtherHOPE HAVENHOUSE OF PRAYER: $21,288 · OtherHOUSE OF PRAYERGRAND RIVER MULTIPURPOSE CENTER: $19,481 · OtherGRAND RIVER MULTIPURPOSE CENTERKI-LI-RO-CO: $14,000 · OtherKI-LI-RO-COOPERATION HELP: $7,000 · Other+16 more: $18,400 · Other+16 moreCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION: $29,250 · Recreation & SportsCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDAT…GRAND RIVER ENTERTAINMENT: $26,000 · Recreation & SportsGRAND RIVER ENTERTAI…CHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS: $33,000 · Housing & ShelterCHILLICOTHE …LIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $26,500 · Public BenefitLIVINGSTO…NORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 · EducationCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT: $5,000 · Food & NutritionKELLY POLING ARTS DISTRICT: $4,453 · Arts & CultureGRAND RIVER HISTORIAL SOCIETY MUSEUM: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$179,381Recreation & Sports$55,250Housing & Shelter$33,000Public Benefit$26,500Education$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Arts & Culture$4,953

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS: $33,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION: $29,250 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $26,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetGRAND RIVER ENTERTAINMENT: $26,000 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetNORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGRAND RIVER HISTORIAL SOCIETY MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAINBOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVER ENTERTAINMENT ↗
  • Who funds NORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT ↗
  • Who funds KELLY POLING ARTS DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SHOES FROM THE HEART ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVER HISTORIAL SOCIETY MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mervyn W Jenkins FoundationMO30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mervyn W Jenkins Foundation · Roger a Browning Foundation Inc · Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation · Livingston County Community Foundation · Hal F Juckette Family Foundation · Minnie B Hedrick Trust · Fm & Gladys McCall Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl C & Ardath Hudnall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph