Skip to content
Carilion New River Valley Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Carilion New River Valley Medical Center

Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through our commitment to a common purpose of better patient care, better community health, and lower cost.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$790kRecreation & Sports$585kHealth$161kCommunity Improvement$161kPhilanthropy$73kCrime & Legal$71kFood & Nutrition$64kHuman Services$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $277k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$580M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NRV REGIONAL COMMISSION$40,000
NRV REGIONAL COMMISSION$40,000
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION$33,500
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION$33,500
RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
BLACKSBURG COUNTRY CLUB FDN$20,000
BLACKSBURG COUNTRY CLUB FDN$20,000
NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC$10,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF THE NRV$10,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF THE NRV$10,000
NEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC$10,000
NEW RIVER VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES$7,500
NEW RIVER VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF THE NRV: $10k → 14%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CTR OF THE NRV: $10k → 14%Radford Child Development Inc: $8k → 14%Radford Child Development Inc: $8k → 14%Radford Child Development Inc: $8k → 14%Radford Child Development: $8k → 14%Radford Child Development: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 13 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$1.5M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+11%

Still filing today

69%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VN
    VIRGINIA'S NEW RIVER VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $135k · revenue +54%
  • EV
    EDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $133k · revenue +83%
  • NR
    NEW RIVER VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $63k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • (A
    (4) Alliance for Better Childcare Strategies
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
  • NR
    NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +11%
  • VK
    VT Knowledge Works LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Virginia Health Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Virginia Community Development Fund Inc

VCDF provides alternative financing and technical assistance to real estate developers engaged in the creation or preservation of affordable housing, community development, and economic development projects throughout our service areas of…

Housing & Shelter
3
New Schools for Virginia

New schools for virginia works with parents, students, educators and the community to improve educational outcomes by designing new schools and by supporting existing schools to improve outcomes.

Education
4
Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation

Vipc grows and diversifies virginia's economy by investing in and accelerating innovation commercialization and entrepreneurship.

Science & Tech
5
West Virginia University Research Corporation

To foster and support research at west virginia university (wvu) and to provide evaluation, development, patenting, management and marketing services for inventions by the faculty, staff, and students of wvu.

Education
6
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
7
The West Virginia Chamber Foundation
Public Benefit
8
River Valley Child Development Services Services Inc

To provide quality services and support to children, families, and the early childhood community

Human Services
9
New River Land Trust

To conserve the rural, natural, and cultural heritage of the new river region, protecting farms, forests, open spaces, and historic places.

Environment
10
Virginia Ready Initiative
—
11
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
12
National Association of Veterans' Research and Education Foundations

Navref's mission is to advance the success of the va-affiliated nonprofit research and education corporations.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New River Community Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Radford Child Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RADFORD UNIVERSITY: $230,225 · OtherRADFORD UNIVERSITYGiles County Public Schools: $221,111 · OtherGiles County Public SchoolsVIRGINIA'S NEW RIVER VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC: $135,000 · OtherVIRGINIA'S NEW RIVER VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AL…FLOYD COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL: $116,427 · OtherFLOYD COUNTY HIGH SCHOOLNEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL COMMISSION: $80,000 · OtherNEW RIVER VALLEY REGIONAL COMMISSIONVIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATION: $68,664 · OtherVIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND RECREATIONNEW RIVER VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $62,500 · OtherNEW RIVER VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC+9 more: $100,335 · Other+9 moreVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $451,562 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $341,250 · EducationRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $132,500 · EducationEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MED…BLACKSBURG COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $106,120 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc: $52,500 · PhilanthropyEO COMPANIES: $20,000 · PhilanthropyRADFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesNEW RIVER VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY RESOURCES EDUCATION & SERVICES: $50,920 · Crime & LegalPlenty Inc: $16,972 · Food & NutritionCALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,014,262Education$925,312Philanthropy$178,620Human Services$56,000Crime & Legal$50,920Food & Nutrition$16,972Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $451,562 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $341,250 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetVIRGINIA'S NEW RIVER VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE INC: $135,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetEDWARD VIA VIRGINIA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE: $132,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKSBURG COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $106,120 over 6y, 47% of budgetNEW RIVER VALLEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $62,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetThe Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc: $52,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNEW RIVER VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY RESOURCES EDUCATION & SERVICES: $50,920 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetRADFORD CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC: $36,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetEO COMPANIES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPlenty Inc: $16,972 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCALFEE COMMUNITY CENTER AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC OF THE NEW RIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BLACKSBURG PARTNERSHIP: $8,409 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…New River Valley Heal…C E Richardson Benevo…Celanese FoundationVanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of the New River Valley IncVA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the New River Valley Inc · New River Valley Health Foundation · C E Richardson Benevolent Foundation · Celanese Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carilion New River Valley Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carilion New River Valley Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carilion New River Valley Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home