Skip to content

· Private foundation

Caplinger Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Caplinger Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Caplinger Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $16k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’19
5
’20
6
’21
7
’22
5
’23
5
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$300kCrime & Legal$22kEducation$21kAnimals$16kHuman Services$16kHealth$14kCommunity Improvement$8kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPPER FOUNDATION$3,000
CASA OF SHAWNEE COUNTY$3,000
SENT TOPEKA INC$2,000
HORIZON ACADEMY$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,000
KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC$2,000
STAR LEGACY FOUNDATION$1,000
SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $2k → 10%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $2k → 10%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $2k → 10%KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 10 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against -92% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$95k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
-92%

Still filing today

60%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CASA OF SHAWNEE COUNTY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +8%
  • HA
    HORIZON ACADEMY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $14k · revenue +65%
  • CF
    CAPPER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $12k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MID AMER
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • CI
    COMMUNITY IN SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • EK
    EVEL KNIEVEL MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $750 · revenue -92%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
2
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
3
Skcac Industries and Employment Services

Empowering people with developmental disabilities through gainful employment and community inclusion.

Employment
4
Ken's Krew

Ken's krew provides job placement, training, and support for individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities in competitive employment.

Human Services
5
Service Enterprises Inc of Minnesota

Service enterprises, inc. of minnesota through effective partnerships, provides quality vocational training, job opportunities, habilitative and other services to individuals with disabilities to promote their independence and active…

Employment
6
The Kansas Youth Empowerment Academy Incorporated

To educate, mentor & support youth with disabilities to be contributingmembers of their community.

Youth Development
7
Disability Rights Center of Kansas Inc

Zealously advocating for the disability rights of kansans to protect their full participation as citizens.

Civil Rights
8
Ability Kc Industries

Ability kc industries gives the individuals we serve the support, structure, and opportunity to engage in their communities, develop occupational skills and navigate the continuum of care for their individualized needs.

Employment
9
Kansas City Autism Training Center Inc

The kansas city autism training center is committed to helping people on the autism spectrum fulfill their potential through ethical, evidence-based treatment, education, and training.

Education
10
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
11
Kidsmart Inc

Kidsmart empowers kids in need to succeed in school by providing free essential tools for learning.

Education
12
Stone Belt Arc Inc

Stone belt believes in the uniqueness, worth, and right to self-determination of every individual. therefore, it is its mission, in partnership with the community to prepare, empower and support persons with disabilities and their families…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ksds Assistance Dogs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Star Legacy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $299,588 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCCAPPER FOUNDATION: $12,000 · OtherCAPPER FOUNDA…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NE KANSAS: $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONA…SENT TOPEKA INC: $8,000 · OtherSENT TOPEKA I…SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE SOCIETY: $8,000 · OtherSECOND CHANCE…KSDS ASSISTANCE INC: $4,000 · OtherKSDS ASSISTAN…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MID AMER: $2,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $2,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY IN SCHOOLS: $2,000 · Other+2 more: $1,000 · OtherCASA OF SHAWNEE COUNTY INC: $22,000 · Civil RightsHORIZON ACADEMY: $14,000 · EducationYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $2,000 · EducationKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesTOPEKA RESCUE MISSION INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterSTAR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthEVEL KNIEVEL MUSEUM INC: $750 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$299,588Other$49,000Civil Rights$22,000Education$16,000Human Services$8,000Housing & Shelter$7,000Health$1,000Arts & Culture$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $299,588 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF SHAWNEE COUNTY INC: $22,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetHORIZON ACADEMY: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCAPPER FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTOPEKA RESCUE MISSION INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVEL KNIEVEL MUSEUM INC: $750 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF SHAWNEE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HORIZON ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CAPPER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KSDS ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOPEKA RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Entrepreneurs Inc ↗
  • Who funds STAR LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVEL KNIEVEL MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Greater Horizons · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Caplinger Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Caplinger Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Caplinger Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Caplinger Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Caplinger Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph