· Public charity
Capitol Hill Village
CAPITOL HILL VILLAGE has a vision of elder adults thriving in vibrant, inclusive, age-friendly communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $35,086 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $51,052 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,966 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KINGDOM CARE SENIOR VILLAGE INC | $16,500 |
| GREATER BROOKLAND INTERGENERATIONAL VILLAGE | $12,586 |
| WATERFRONT VILLAGE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GBGreater Brookland Intergenerational Village2× · 2023–2024 · $33k · revenue +11%
- NNNORTHWEST NEIGHBORS VILLAGE3× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +66%
- WVWATERFRONT VILLAGE INC4× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- FBFoggy Bottom West End Village Incone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -7%
- EREAST ROCK CREEK VILLAGE INCone grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -3%
- PVPalisades Villagegraduatedone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San Francisco Village is an innovative membership organization that enables residents to age in their own homes. The Village is dedicated to building community connections for San Francisco residents aged 60 and older, assisted by a robust…
The Washington Area Villages Exchange (WAVE) brings together nonprofit villages in the wider Washington DC region to learn and grow by sharing experiences and ideas.
To enable older adults to continue living safely, independently, and with an enhanced quality of life in their own homes and communities as they age by providing access to support services and social programs.
The primary exempt purpose of Glover Park Village, Inc.(GPV): To provide services to our constituents that will engender vibrant aging in the community. GPV provides services, information, opportunities and social services that mitigate…
Build community for seniors to age in place; support nationwide village movement.
To sustain a robust neighbors-helping-neighbors network that supports older adults who wish to live as independently as possible and be fully engaged in their community as they age.
We enable seniors to live in their own homes independently, connect with their community, and age with dignity and grace.
This corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for charitable purposes. The specific purpose of this…
WCSC connects and empowers older adults to live happy, healthy, and engaged lives.
We are a volunteer and membership organization dedicated to enabling older adults located within our northern atlanta service area to continue living in their own homes safely and comfortably. Our members have access to volunteer support…
Promote and support independent living for mature adults through volunteer opportunities, transportation assistance, support services, lifelong learning and cultural enrichment opportunities.
To provide a "village" of caring friends, neighbors and volunteers helping seniors age in their homes and communities. Mount Vernon at Home links residents to social and cultural activities while providing access to health and home…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greater Brookland Intergenerational Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Greater Brookland Intergenerational Village ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST NEIGHBORS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Kingdom Care Senior Village ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND PARK VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds DUPONT CIRCLE VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Foggy Bottom West End Village Inc ↗
- Who funds EAST ROCK CREEK VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Palisades Village ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foggy Bottom West End Village Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Capitol Hill Village funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.