Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Capitol Hill Village

CAPITOL HILL VILLAGE has a vision of elder adults thriving in vibrant, inclusive, age-friendly communities. To achieve this vision, CAPITOL HILL VILLAGE helps older adults navigate and embrace the opportunities of aging. Through the efforts of volunteers, members, partners, and staff we provide a wide-range of services and programs that…

$51k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
8
Organizations funded FY2023
38%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$35k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$12,586
Largest grant, FY2024
$16,500
Organizations funded a year
2 to 8
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$1.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 38% of the organizations Capitol Hill Village funded were first-time grantees, receiving 45% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$35k0%
FY20238$92k38%
FY20214$30k50%
FY20192$11k50%
FY20185$36kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$181kReligion$17kFood & Nutrition$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Greater Brookland Intergenerational Village$32,969215%
Northwest Neighbors Village$30,00035%
Waterfront Village Inc$27,92844%
Kingdom Care Senior Village$24,87526%
Greater Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church$17,1002n/a
Cleveland Park Village Inc$15,67523%
Dupont Circle Village$15,00323%
Georgetown Village Inc$13,60023%
Foggy Bottom West End Village Inc$12,37411%
East Rock Creek Village Inc$7,2521n/a
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Capitol Hill Village by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Greater Brookland Intergenerational Village$32,969215%
Northwest Neighbors Village$30,00035%
Waterfront Village Inc$27,92844%
Kingdom Care Senior Village$24,87526%
Greater Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church$17,1002n/a
Cleveland Park Village Inc$15,67523%
Dupont Circle Village$15,00323%
Georgetown Village Inc$13,60023%
Foggy Bottom West End Village Inc$12,37411%
East Rock Creek Village Inc$7,2521n/a
Palisades Village$7,12813%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Capitol Hill Village supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGreater Brookland Intergenerational Village: $32,969 over 2y, 15% of budgetNorthwest Neighbors Village: $30,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetWaterfront Village Inc: $27,928 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetKingdom Care Senior Village: $24,875 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetCleveland Park Village Inc: $15,675 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetDupont Circle Village: $15,003 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetGeorgetown Village Inc: $13,600 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFoggy Bottom West End Village Inc: $12,374 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPalisades Village: $7,128 over 1y, 2.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foggy Bottom West End Village IncDC24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foggy Bottom West End Village Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Capitol Hill Village with peer funders

About Capitol Hill Village

How much does Capitol Hill Village give?
Capitol Hill Village reported 3 itemized grants totaling $35,086, out of $51,052 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 8 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Capitol Hill Village fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (89%), Religion (8%), Food & Nutrition (3%).
Who are Capitol Hill Village's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Greater Brookland Intergenerational Village ($33k), Northwest Neighbors Village ($30k), Waterfront Village Inc ($28k).
Does Capitol Hill Village fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Capitol Hill Village?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Foggy Bottom West End Village Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Capitol Hill Village based?
Capitol Hill Village is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Capitol Hill Village’s filings →

More from the funding graph