Skip to content

· Public charity

Capitalize Albany Corporation

The mission of CAPITALIZE ALBANY CORPORATION is to facilitate strategic economic development and stimulate transformative investment throughout the city of albany, making new york's capital a vibrant place to thrive.

$352k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$337kArts & Culture$269kFood & Nutrition$173kHousing & Shelter$156kHealth$55kEnvironment$27kScience & Tech$25kHuman Services$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $308,768, the rows itemized in this filing. The $351,712 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,944 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $290k
$22,719
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRYS-STYLE BEAUTY LLC DBA STUDIO23$31,030
VIVA EMPANADAS$28,000
HALO WHOLESALE FOOD COMPANY LLC$25,000
RECTOR PLACE PARTNERS INC$25,000
FOODSCRAPS 360 LLC$25,000
HOT CRISPY OIL LLC$25,000
RECONSTRUCTION HOME VENTURES LLC$25,000
HIVE OF HOPE INC$23,128
LATIN AMERICAN HOSPITALITY$22,719
BOMBSHELL MIDTOWN$17,110
HIIT IT WITH BRITT LLC$12,585
VIETQUEUE INC$10,145
RJS RE HOLDINGS LLC$10,000
ENVISION ARCHITECTS$10,000
THE SKINNY PANCAKE INC$7,045
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%16 SHERIDAN AVENUE LLC: $21k → 12%MEATBALL MARTINI MADISON LLC: $25k → 14%420 BROADWAY ALBANY LLC: $13k → 12%HILL STREET CAFE: $10k → 14%LARK HALL PRODUCTIONS: $25k → 14%KURD LLC: $10k → 14%FOODSCRAPS 360 LLC: $25k → 14%HIVE OF HOPE INC: $23k → 14%LATIN AMERICAN HOSPITALITY: $23k → 14%PRINZO'S BAKERY: $13k → 14%LOCH & QUAY LLC: $66k → 14%BULL MARKETS HOLDING COMPANY LLC: $32k → 14%CRYS-STYLE BEAUTY LLC DBA STUDIO23: $31k → 14%THE ALBANY DISTILLING COMPANY INC: $30k → 14%VIVA EMPANADAS: $28k → 14%RDS TRIO INC: $25k → 14%RECTOR PLACE PARTNERS INC: $25k → 14%FIDENS BREWING COMPANY LLC: $25k → 14%HOT CRISPY OIL LLC: $25k → 14%THE GREEK HOUSE OF ALBANY LLC: $24k → 14%SEMBLANCE MEDSPA LLC: $24k → 14%VANDEHEYDEN HALL: $16k → 14%DON'S MOVING & STORAGE INC: $14k → 14%WGM74 LLC: $11k → 14%VIETQUEUE INC: $10k → 14%ENVISION ARCHITECTS: $10k → 14%HALO WHOLESALE FOOD COMPANY LLC: $25k → 14%RECONSTRUCTION HOME VENTURES LLC: $25k → 14%NEW SCOTCH LLC DBA NEW SCOTLAND SPIRITS: $25k → 14%WINE AND DINE GROUP LLC: $12k → 14%DINO'S PIZZA: $10k → 14%PRECISE FISCAL IS LLC: $10k → 14%351 HUDSON AVENUE LLC: $10k → 14%BOMBSHELL MIDTOWN: $17k → 14%MICHAEL LIPNICK DMD & VINCENT GIGLIO DDS: $15k → 14%RJS RE HOLDINGS LLC: $10k → 14%MAC EQUIPMENT: $25k → 14%SHOPJOY LLC: $24k → 14%FAITH CREATIVE NAMES: $22k → 14%NOR JEWELERS LLC: $22k → 14%CENTRAL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOC INC: $10k → 14%JOHN MANCINI: $10k → 14%NORTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLIND AT ALBANY INC: $10k → 14%EDEN'S ROSE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ARE EVENTS PRODUCTIONS: $25k → 14%THE OLDE ENGLISH PUB & PANTRY: $15k → 14%THE YARD: $17k → 14%HIIT IT WITH BRITT LLC: $13k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 6 repeat orgs$927k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
46

Total granted

$193k
$629k

Still filing today

0%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $299k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LQ
    LOCH & QUAY LLC
    2× · 2018–2024 · $72k
  • BM
    BULL MARKETS HOLDING COMPANY LLC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $39k
  • TY
    THE YARD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ALBANY DISTILLING COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • RT
    RDS TRIO INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • ME
    MAC EQUIPMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Aid Assn of Amsterdam Ny
—
2
New York Armenian Home Inc
Human Services
3
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
4
German-American School Association

German-American School has been teaching German to children since l892. In the late l9th century the schools students came from German immigrant community and the schools purpose was to teach German literature, history, and culture (in…

—
5
Sara Curry Day School

Sara curry day school provides primary school (grades kindergarten through grade 5) in the community

—
6
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
7
Hudson Community Living Company
Housing & Shelter
8
The Habib Levy Cultural & Educational Foundation
Arts & Culture
9
New York Albany Tamil Sangam
Arts & Culture
10
Manhattan Eye & Ear Ophthalmology Alumni Foundation Inc
Health
11
New York Congregational Community Services
Health
12
International Academy of New York

To operate a bilingual school for children, a preschool for children 3 years of age through grade eight. the values and principles and practices of the school will reflect those of a diverse and multi-cultural school community of cultural…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vanderheyden Hall Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gulsum and Gulser Kurd Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOCH & QUAY LLC: $72,261 · OtherLOCH & QUAY LLCBULL MARKETS HOLDING COMPANY LLC: $39,032 · Other+60 more: $943,794 · Other+60 moreHIVE OF HOPE INC: $23,128 · HealthCENTRAL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementEDENS ROSE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · InternationalGulsum and Gulser Kurd Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCASTLE ISLAND BILINGUAL MONTESSORI: $6,800 · EducationALBANY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,055,087Health$23,128Community Improvement$10,000International$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Education$6,800Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIVE OF HOPE INC: $23,128 over 1y, 12% of budgetVANDERHEYDEN HALL INC: $15,558 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL DISTRICT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF THE BLIND AT ALBANY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDENS ROSE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCASTLE ISLAND BILINGUAL MONTESSORI: $6,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetALBANY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIVE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds VANDERHEYDEN HALL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Central District Management Association · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Capitalize Albany Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Capitalize Albany Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Capitalize Albany’s filings →

    More from the funding graph