Skip to content
Capital Impact Partners at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Capital Impact Partners

Through capital and commitment, CAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS helps build (please go to schedule o) inclusive and equitable communities by providing people access to the capital and opportunities they deserve.

$7.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$773k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$33MHousing & Shelter$12MFood & Nutrition$1.4MHealth$264kHuman Services$221kArts & Culture$163kEmployment$104kEducation$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $269k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+10 grants · $4.5M
$100,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$851M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA MONTANITA FOOD COOPERATIVE$773,410
MT VERNON MANOR INC$750,000
CDC SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORP$603,000
IBF DEVELOPMENT LLC$505,900
YOKE MANAGEMENT LLC$334,325
BIG OAKLAND LLC$330,000
FLGREENE ASSOCIATE LLC$300,000
CAPITAL REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC$300,000
JESSICA WASHINGTON DBA PRETTY GIRLS LOVE REAL ESTATE LLC$300,000
PARAGON REO 1 LLC$300,000
1232 SHIFT CUBED PARTNERS$223,000
PARTNERS FOR EQUITABLE COMMUNITY GROWTH$211,439
VANTAGE REALTY CAPITAL LLC$188,070
DREAMING OUT LOUD INC$176,708
BETHUNE DEVELOPMENT$155,176
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERVE THE PEOPLE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $35k → 10%NORTHERN GREAT LAKES INITIATIVES: $75k → 11%COGIC COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 15%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION: $40k → 16%ALLEN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $40k → 16%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION: $40k → 16%QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $278k → 13%QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $139k → 13%QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $139k → 13%CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC: $724k → 14%EMBOLDEN REAL ESTATE LLC: $334k → 14%CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC: $234k → 14%CENTRONIA: $80k → 14%CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC: $64k → 14%CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC: $55k → 14%CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC: $36k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER INC: $27k → 14%MEDICI ROAD INC: $343k → 14%MEDICI ROAD INC: $158k → 14%MEDICI ROAD INC: $131k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$43M · 68 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
157

Total granted

$43M
$8.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+26%

Still filing today

37%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CDC SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +31%
  • THE REINVESTMENT FUND INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4.2M · revenue +4%
  • LI
    LOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUND
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4.2M · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • E1
    EUCLID 1722 LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $600k
  • 1K
    1825 KENDALL STREET
    one grant, 2024 · $500k
  • AL
    A-PEACE LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $450k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Non-Profit Community Developmen Corporation of Dc

Npcdc's mission is to initate, sponsor and operate housing and economic development projects that create economic stability and upward mobility for low-income families in metropolitan washington, dc.

Housing & Shelter
2
Community Development Network of Maryland Inc

To promote, strengthen, and advocate for the community development sector throughout Marylands urban, suburban, and rural communities.

Community Improvement
3
Dc Community Development Consortium Institute
Community Improvement
4
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
5
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Virginia Community Development Corp

VCDC delivers vital financial resources and support while collaborating with local organizations dedicated to social impact, ensuring the creation of affordable homes in vibrant neighborhoods where everyone can thrive.

Housing & Shelter
7
Housing Development Center

Centering those who have been historically oppressed, housing development center, inc. collaborates with its partners to envision, develop, and sustain affordable homes and community places.

Housing & Shelter
8
Westside Neighborhood Developm

Community development via home ownership and home repair programs. financial literacy education

Community Improvement
9
Center for Public Enterprise Inc

Improving public sector capacity to reduce the burdens of government.

Public Benefit
10
Central Area Collaborative

To ensure the commercial vitality of the Central District

Community Improvement
11
Collaborative Development Corporation

CDC focuses on stabilization, housing and job readiness in order to strengthen both the family and the clients we support. CDC provides housing support, fiscal literacy and job readiness help focusing on credit repair, stabilization and…

Housing & Shelter
12
Detroit Future City

Detroit Future City (DFC) was founded in 2015 to catalyze implementation of the Detroit Strategic Framework, a 50-year vision for the City of Detroit developed with input from over 100,000 Detroiters. See Schedule O.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beloved Community Incubator Inc; the most unlike its peers is Louisiana Perinatal Justice Allianc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 247 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
76/79
Grantees still filing
50/79
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON AREA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND INC: $2,227,918 · OtherWASHINGTON AREA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND INCIBF DEVELOPMENT LLC: $1,061,456 · Other+151 more: $24,651,105 · Other+151 moreCDC SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION: $4,936,197 · Community ImprovementCDC SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CO…THE REINVESTMENT FUND INC: $4,218,333 · Community ImprovementTHE REINVESTMENT FUND INCLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,196,112 · Community ImprovementLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C…COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC: $555,556 · Community ImprovementFIFTH WARD COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $555,556 · Community ImprovementBuilders of Hope CDC: $555,556 · Community Improvement+10 more: $1,013,293 · Community Improvement+10 moreLOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUND: $4,218,333 · Housing & ShelterLOW INCOME INV…MT VERNON MANOR INC: $1,305,556 · Housing & ShelterMT VERNON MANO…DALLAS CITY HOMES INC: $555,556 · Housing & ShelterDALLAS CITY HO…NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN: $555,556 · Housing & ShelterNEW ECONOMICS …Coalition for Nonprofit Housing and: $250,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more: $252,000 · Housing & ShelterCITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC: $1,111,369 · Human ServicesMEDICI ROAD: $966,589 · Human ServicesQUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $555,556 · Human Services+6 more: $337,348 · Human ServicesHOLOS INC: $555,556 · EducationNORTH AMERICAN STUDENTS OF COOPERATION: $65,000 · EducationRED EMMAS EDUCATION FUND: $50,000 · EducationENGAGED COMMUNITY OFFSHOOTS: $30,000 · EducationCOLLECTIVE REMAKE ART BUSINESS EDUCATION JOBS NEWS PEOPLE AND REC: $25,000 · EducationFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC: $340,568 · Food & NutritionDetroit Black Community Food Sovereignty Network: $115,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FARMSHARE: $50,000 · Food & NutritionSPROUT URBAN FARMS INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionCommon Good City Farm: $42,847 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $546,711 · Youth Development
Other$27,940,479Community Improvement$14,030,603Housing & Shelter$7,137,001Human Services$2,970,862Education$725,556Food & Nutrition$628,415Youth Development$546,711

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCDC SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION: $4,936,197 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetTHE REINVESTMENT FUND INC: $4,218,333 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetLOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUND: $4,218,333 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND INC: $2,227,918 over 7y, 26% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,196,112 over 7y, 17% of budgetMT VERNON MANOR INC: $1,305,556 over 4y, 18% of budgetCITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC: $1,111,369 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMEDICI ROAD: $966,589 over 3y, 87% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP OF NORTH RICHMOND: $555,556 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC: $555,556 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetDALLAS CITY HOMES INC: $555,556 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetFIFTH WARD COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $555,556 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetQUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $555,556 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetHOLOS INC: $555,556 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBuilders of Hope CDC: $555,556 over 3y, 13% of budgetNEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN: $555,556 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $546,711 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetMIDTOWN DETROIT INC: $343,424 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetFAIR FOOD NETWORK INC: $340,568 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCoalition for Nonprofit Housing and: $250,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY CULTURAL CENTER ASSOCIATION: $232,018 over 2y, 77% of budgetDetroit Development Fund: $200,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $137,535 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDetroit Black Community Food Sovereignty Network: $115,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetTHE MICHIGAN WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGRANDMONT ROSEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORP: $85,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRONIA: $80,348 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRESH START CDC INC: $80,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetNORTHERN GREAT LAKES INITIATIVES: $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN STUDENTS OF COOPERATION: $65,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetNorthend Christian Community Development Corporation: $54,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetRED EMMAS EDUCATION FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetCOMMUNITY FARMSHARE: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetGENESIS HARBOR OF OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTING EXCELLENCE: $50,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSPROUT URBAN FARMS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetNORTHWEST COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $45,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetThe Shepherds Table Inc: $43,975 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHOPE FOUNDATION REENTRY NETWORK INC: $43,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCommon Good City Farm: $42,847 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetProspera Community Development: $40,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAllen Neighborhood Center: $40,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetAFRITHRIVE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCINCINNATI UNION COOPERATIVE INITIATIVE: $35,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSERVE THE PEOPLE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARIN CITY HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDUSTRIAL COMMONS: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CDC SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE REINVESTMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LOW INCOME INVESTMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON AREA COMMUNITY INVESTMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MT VERNON MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY FIRST ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICI ROAD ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP OF NORTH RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CITY HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds FIFTH WARD COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Builders of Hope CDC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds DREAMING OUT LOUD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community …Citi FoundationThe Kresge FoundationThe Morris and Gwendo…Greater Washington Co…Eugene & Agnes E Meye…Enterprise Community …City First Enterprise…Washington Area Commu…Fair Food Network IncWells Fargo FoundationUnited Way for Southe…
Enterprise Community Partners IncMD30.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Citi Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Enterprise Community Loan Fund Inc · City First Enterprises Inc · Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc · Fair Food Network Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Capital Impact Partners funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Capital Impact Partners. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 41%
  • Afrithrive Inc: 41% of income from government
  • African American Alliance of Cdfi CEOs: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 247 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Capital Impact Partners’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home