Skip to content

· Private foundation

Canton Community Health Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$78kFood & Nutrition$63kEducation$60kCommunity Improvement$35kHealth$33kRecreation & Sports$27kHuman Services$24kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,550
Median grant
1
States reached
$891k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANTON SENIOR & SOCIAL SERVICES$6,000
CANTON FOOD BANK$6,000
CANTON EMERGENCY FUEL BANK$6,000
HEALING MEALS COMMUNITY PROJECT$6,000
CANTON FIRE AND EMS$5,616
SPIRIT HORSE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CTR$5,200
CANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
SUMMIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS$3,550
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ROARING BROOK NATURE CENTER$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 20 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
31

Total granted

$307k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+369%

Still filing today

25%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CANTON FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $48k
  • CE
    CANTON EMERGENCY FUEL BANK
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k
  • FO
    FOCUS ON CANTON INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $35k

Funded once

  • CP
    CANTON PARKS AND RECREATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CE
    CANTON EMERGENCY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • CA
    Canton Athletic Booster Club
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANTON FOOD BANK INC: $48,000 · OtherCANTON FOOD BANK INCCANTON EMERGENCY FUEL BANK: $40,000 · OtherCANTON EMERGENCY FUEL BANKFOCUS ON CANTON INC: $35,000 · OtherFOCUS ON CANTON INCCANTON FIRE AND EMS: $21,616 · OtherCANTON FIRE AND EMSIndividual grant recipient: $18,370 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANTON SENIOR & SOCIAL SERVICES: $18,000 · OtherCANTON SENIOR & SOCIAL SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherCANTON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $14,000 · Other+44 more: $103,042 · Other+44 moreSPIRIT HORSE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $32,615 · Human ServicesSPIRIT HORSE T…SUMMIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $9,550 · Human ServicesSUMMIT ADAPTIV…GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesGIFTS OF LOVE …+1 more: $450 · Human ServicesHEALING MEALS FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $9,500 · Food & NutritionCanton Athletic Booster Club: $5,000 · Education
Other$314,528Human Services$47,615Food & Nutrition$9,500Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPIRIT HORSE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $32,615 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetSUMMIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $9,550 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHEALING MEALS FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $9,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGIFTS OF LOVE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPIRIT HORSE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING MEALS FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GIFTS OF LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Canton Athletic Booster Club ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS CONNECTICUT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Community Bank Foundation IncCT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Community Bank Foundation Inc · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Canton Community Health Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Canton Community Health Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 42%
  • Special Olympics Connecticut Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Healing Meals Foundation Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Canton Community Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph