· Public charity
Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc
To collect, hold and invest funds and provide financial support and assistance to camphill village usa, inc.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMPHILL VILLAGE USA INC | $2,490,609 |
| CAMPHILL GHENT INC | $534,600 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CVCAMPHILL VILLAGE USA INC9× · 2017–2026 · $15M · revenue +0%
- CGCAMPHILL GHENT INC9× · 2017–2026 · $6.9M · revenue +27% · 32% of their budget
- RARaphael Academy2× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue -77%
Funded once
- RCRiverflow Community Incone grant, 2025 · $20k
- LOLOKELANI OHANAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +71%
- CCCHRISTIAN CUMMUNITY MOVEMENT FOR RELIGIOUS RENEWAL IN THE TACONIC-one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support people with disabilities in becoming fully engaged in life through education, vocational training, supportedemployment and residential community living.
To establish and maintain a community in which individuals live and work together so that disabled people may reach their fullest human potential. the purpose shall include: providing life and vocational training and education of…
Providing affordable and supportive housing for individuals with disabilities.
Our mission is to build community with people of all abilities through living, learning, working and creating with people of all ages, races, abilities, and creeds.
To create and sustain a community where people with and without disabilities live, work, and care for each other to foster social, cultural, and agricultural renewal.
Creating housing for adults on the autism spectrum
Provide respite care and meaningful day services for adults with developmental disabilities by focusing on experiences that nurture connections with nature through therapeutic farm animals gardening recreation and interest-based activities
To provide the opportunity for adults with developmental disabilities to achieve emotional, social, and spritiual growth in a safe secure home-like atmosphere.
To provide employment opportunities and suitable housing for adults with developmental disabilities.
Continuing life community will provide support services for adults with developmental disabilities. this population has aged out of the various programs and entitlements readily available. this situation comes at the very time when parents…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Riverflow Community Inc: 43% of income from government
- Heartbeet Lifesharing Corporation: 13% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Camphill Village Copake’s filings →