· Public charity
Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc
To collect, hold and invest funds and provide financial support and assistance to camphill village usa, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
- $250k+2 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMPHILL VILLAGE USA INC | $2,339,833 |
| CAMPHILL GHENT INC | $654,472 |
| RAPHAEL ACADEMY | $20,000 |
| RIVERFLOW COMMUNITY INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCAMPHILL VILLAGE USA INC8× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +19%
- CGCAMPHILL GHENT INC8× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +63% · 32% of their budget
- RARaphael Academy2× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue -77%
Funded once
- LOLOKELANI OHANAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +71%
- CCCHRISTIAN CUMMUNITY MOVEMENT FOR RELIGIOUS RENEWAL IN THE TACONIC-one grant, 2024 · $20k
- PFPLOWSHARE FARM INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +93%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support people with disabilities in becoming fully engaged in life through education, vocational training, supportedemployment and residential community living.
Providing affordable and supportive housing for individuals with disabilities.
Creating housing for adults on the autism spectrum
To establish and maintain a community in which individuals live and work together so that disabled people may reach their fullest human potential. the purpose shall include: providing life and vocational training and education of…
Our mission is to build community with people of all abilities through living, learning, working and creating with people of all ages, races, abilities, and creeds.
To create and sustain a community where people with and without disabilities live, work, and care for each other to foster social, cultural, and agricultural renewal.
Continuing life community will provide support services for adults with developmental disabilities. this population has aged out of the various programs and entitlements readily available. this situation comes at the very time when parents…
To provide the opportunity for adults with developmental disabilities to achieve emotional, social, and spritiual growth in a safe secure home-like atmosphere.
To provide a place where people with intellectual disabilities are nurtured and valued, a place where they will be engaged in all aspects of their lives, learning and working alongside lifelong friends, family and members of the community.
Provide respite care and meaningful day services for adults with developmental disabilities by focusing on experiences that nurture connections with nature through therapeutic farm animals gardening recreation and interest-based activities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camphill Ghent Inc and the most unlike its peers is Raphael Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Riverflow Community Inc — 43% of income from government
- Heartbeet Lifesharing Corporation — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.