Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Camphill Foundation

CAMPHILL FOUNDATION (the "foundation") was formed to grow, strengthen, and safeguard the camphill movement in north america through strategic grants and programmatic initiatives that ensure long-term sustainability and flourishing of camphill communities.

$405k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.2MHealth$530kCivil Rights$400kHousing & Shelter$305kHuman Services$295kCommunity Improvement$74kFood & Nutrition$64kEnvironment$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $206,692 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $405,027 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $198,335 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMPHILL ACADEMY$85,000
HEARTBEET LIFESHARING$23,173
CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA$20,000
CAMPHILL GHENT$20,000
RAPHAEL VILLAGE$15,000
OTTO SPECHT SCHOOL$12,000
CAMPHILL HUDSON$12,000
CAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS$11,120
CAMPHILL SOLTANE$8,399
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $515k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STANTON HOME BERKSHIRE VILLAGE: $3k → 12%CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA: $24k → 11%HEARTBEET LIFESHARING: $200k → 12%RAPHAEL VILLAGE: $50k → 23%CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA: $20k → 11%HEARTBEET: $28k → 12%RAPHAEL VILLAGE: $44k → 23%CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA: $15k → 11%HEARTBEET LIFESHARING: $23k → 12%RAPHAEL VILLAGE: $40k → 23%CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA: $13k → 11%RAPHAEL VILLAGE: $17k → 23%CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA: $8k → 11%HEARTBEET LIFESHARING: $8k → 12%RAPHAEL VILLAGE: $15k → 23%RAPHAEL VILLAGE: $8k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MN
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
LA

Grants abroad, by region — $186k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$66k · 36% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT, CAPITAL PROJECTS · CAPITAL, UPGRADES TO COMMUNITY CENTRE · GENERAL SUPPORT

South Asia$50k · 27% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: NEW LIFESHARING COMMUNITY

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$33k · 18% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: CAPITAL PROJECTS

South America$19k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$18k · 10% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 16 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$2.8M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+52%

Still filing today

88%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CAMPHILL ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $608k · revenue +46% · 36% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $551k · revenue +74%
  • CA
    CAMPHILL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERI CA
    6× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +21% · 45% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $28k
  • H
    HEARTBEET
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • S
    SOLTANE
    one grant, 2017 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cape Cod Village Inc

Creating housing for adults on the autism spectrum

Housing & Shelter
2
Community Homestead Inc

To establish and maintain a community in which individuals live and work together so that disabled people may reach their fullest human potential. the purpose shall include: providing life and vocational training and education of…

Human Services
3
Cumberland Residential and Employment Services & Training Inc

Provide long-term residential services to persons having medically diagnosed disabilities attributable to mental retardation, cerebral palsy, autism, or epilepsy.

Health
4
Camphill Village Copake Foundation Inc

To collect, hold and invest funds and provide financial support and assistance to camphill village usa, inc. and other organizatons related to the camphill movement.

Human Services
5
The Village Community

To provide a place where people with intellectual disabilities are nurtured and valued, a place where they will be engaged in all aspects of their lives, learning and working alongside lifelong friends, family and members of the community.

Housing & Shelter
6
Carobell Inc

Carobell, inc. is dedicated to empowering individuals to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services
7
Hilltop Ranch

Hilltop Ranch's mission is to create and operate a sustainable residential community for adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD) that expresses the love of Jesus Christ.

Human Services
8
Calmra Inc

To improve the lives of persons with developmental disabilities by providing the highest quality residential and other support services in an ethical and loving environment.

Human Services
9
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
10
Camphill Soltane Foundation

To advance the mission, purpose, and the activities of camphill soltane by providing funding through mission aligned investing capital.

Philanthropy
11
Caldwell Opportunities

To promote employment and independence of persons with disabilities through customer, business, community partnerships and leadership.

Human Services
12
Caramore Community

To empower adults living with severe and persistent mental illness in north carolina with the tools to lead meaningful and independent lives.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camphill Village Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Raphael Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMPHILL ACADEMY — $608,000 · EducationCAMPHILL ACADEMYTHE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC — $550,808 · EducationTHE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INCCAMPHILL SOLTANE — $48,899 · Education+1 more — $34,000 · EducationCAMPHILL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERI CA — $400,000 · OtherCAMPHILL ASSOCIATION OF …CAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON — $115,630 · OtherCAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERT…Individual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Individual grant recipient — $27,500 · OtherPLOWSHARE FARM INC — $25,000 · OtherHEARTBEET — $22,400 · Other+2 more — $14,720 · OtherHEARTBEET LIFESHARING CORPORATION — $259,173 · Human ServicesHEARTBEET LIFESHARI…Raphael Village — $174,190 · Human ServicesRaphael VillageCAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA INC — $79,500 · Human ServicesCAMPHILL VILLAGE MI…+1 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesCAMPHILL VILLAGE USA INC — $136,752 · HealthCamphill Communities California — $90,500 · HealthCAMPHILL HUDSON INC — $107,500 · Housing & ShelterCAMPHILL GHENT INC — $82,000 · Housing & ShelterCAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC — $65,120 · Food & NutritionTRIFORM CAMPHILL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $57,000 · Community Improvement
Education$1,241,707Other$645,250Human Services$515,363Health$227,252Housing & Shelter$189,500Food & Nutrition$65,120Community Improvement$57,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMPHILL ACADEMY — $608,000 over 9y, 36% of budgetTHE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC — $550,808 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetCAMPHILL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERI CA — $400,000 over 6y, 45% of budgetHEARTBEET LIFESHARING CORPORATION — $259,173 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetRaphael Village — $174,190 over 6y, 18% of budgetCAMPHILL VILLAGE USA INC — $136,752 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCAMPHILL HUDSON INC — $107,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetCamphill Communities California — $90,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCAMPHILL GHENT INC — $82,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA INC — $79,500 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC — $65,120 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTRIFORM CAMPHILL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $57,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetCAMPHILL SOLTANE — $48,899 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHREEFOLD EDUCATION FOUNDATION AND SCHOOL — $34,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLOWSHARE FARM INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLife Needs Coop Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMPHILL ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE CAMPHILL SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CAMPHILL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERI CA
  • Who funds HEARTBEET LIFESHARING CORPORATION
  • Who funds Raphael Village
  • Who funds CAMPHILL VILLAGE USA INC
  • Who funds CAMPHILL HUDSON INC
  • Who funds Camphill Communities California
  • Who funds CAMPHILL GHENT INC
  • Who funds CAMPHILL VILLAGE MINNESOTA INC
  • Who funds CAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC
  • Who funds TRIFORM CAMPHILL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CAMPHILL SOLTANE
  • Who funds THREEFOLD EDUCATION FOUNDATION AND SCHOOL
  • Who funds PLOWSHARE FARM INC
  • Who funds Life Needs Coop Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Camphill Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 36%
  • Life Needs Coop Inc36% of income from government
  • Heartbeet Lifesharing Corporation17% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph