Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Camiener Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$395kHealth$204kRecreation & Sports$155kEducation$110kHousing & Shelter$90kYouth Development$37k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $115k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS$25,000
INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION$25,000
HIRAM HOUSE$20,000
BASCOM PALMER EYE INSTITUTE$20,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$15,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$10,000
FRIENDS OF IDF$9,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$952k · 10 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$952k
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+164%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HIRAM HOUSE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +21%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    4× · 2020–2023 · $110k · revenue +66%
  • THE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $90k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CF
    Camp for All Kidsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +164%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
2
Greater Miami Hillel Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

3
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
6
Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities

The auschwitz institute for the prevention of genocide and mass atrocities is dedicated to building a world that prevents genocide. we aim to see every state effectively integrate within government the domestically developed function of…

International
7
Ek Kadam Aur

Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.

International
8
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
9
The Israel Forever Foundation
Arts & Culture
10
New York Institute for Special Education

The mission of the new york institute for special education is to provide quality educational programs and support to students and families in a safe caring environment to awaken and inspire student curiosity, lifelong learning and…

Education
11
Marcus Jewish Community Center of Atlanta Inc

To foster and ensure a vibrant greater Atlanta Jewish community by providing programs and services of distinction that attract, involve, and inspire meaningful connections and promote Jewish values.

Human Services
12
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guide Dog Foundation for the Blind Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp for All Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION — $360,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSIONTHE HIRAM HOUSE — $140,000 · OtherTHE HIRAM HOUSEUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS — $121,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS+3 more — $47,000 · Other+3 moreTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE INTERACTIVE …GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $51,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR…University of Miami — $110,000 · EducationUniversity o…OPEN DOORS INC — $36,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $500 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $17,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $17,000 · International
Other$668,000Human Services$141,000Education$110,000Youth Development$36,500International$34,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION — $360,000 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetTHE HIRAM HOUSE — $140,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC — $90,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC — $51,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOORS INC — $36,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCamp for All Kids — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS IN MISSION
  • Who funds THE HIRAM HOUSE
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds THE INTERACTIVE RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds OPEN DOORS INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds Camp for All Kids

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Camiener Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph